I read somewhere girls are better at not getting caught, so it's possible they cheat more. If we look at numbers though, men are higher according to statistics. That doesn't prove much though. Only thing we know for certain is both men and women cheat and its wrong.
Statistics don't prove anything, not necessarily. For example, if I take a sample size of 30 people and calculate the average annual income and came up with a high number, you would assume most of them make a lot in a year. Not necessarily true. All it would take is 1 or 2 that make outrageous amounts a year to shift that number, or 1 of them with no income.
I honestly don't know. But I had a female friend whose boyfriend cheated back in high school, so she cheated as a revenge. In hindsight, they were both people I shouldn't have frequented, lacking any respect and education.
@Aphrodite8789 Actually, I think his observation is correct-in high school (and even among traditional college students), it's basically the same "elite" guys being passed around the whole school/campus.
@EnglishArtsteacher according to peer reviewed studies by kinsey institute, and also observed in the vast majoirty of mammel spieces similar to humans, this is exactly what occurs. Most females all take turns trying to have sex with the same few dudes until they realize those same few dudes won't commit resources to most of the girls they are hooking up with, and then the remaining 90% of girls they are having sex with will try to find a male with lesser genes who is actually a much closer match to them genetically in terms of attractiveness than the hansom male is, and that is when they magically "realize they actually wanted a nice lesser male" all along.
This is how it is with most spieces of monkey and ape, and humans are extremely similar to that, just on a much larger global scale in terms of city or province.
Generally a females most optimal strategy for reproduction and continuation of offspring is to secure the top quality mate possible who also has tons of access to resources to ensure their offspring survives easier and stays healthier, while securing commitment ling term from the top quality male to provide protection to them while raising their offspring. But failing to do this to the fullest extent (as all but the highest quality females will in primate like spieces), the female primates best strategy is to get impregnated with the genetic material of the highest quality male's sperm to produce fit, hansom and intelligent offspring, while finding a lesser male (in term of genetic potential who's kids would be less likely to survive as easy) and have that lesser male contribute resources to them and protect them while raising the females offspring she had with the top quality male - meanwhile the lesser male will be unable to tell if the child is his or not, or settle and raise the top quality males offspring as long as he may also get an offspring of his own out of it with the female later on he would be unable to do so on his own otherwise.
The top quality males best strategy for reproduction of genes, is to reproduce with as many decent quality females as possible while having a fairly high assurance other lesser males will ultimately end of raising them, or gamble on the fact that even if several offspring die, most will not. So instead of commiting to one female partner and waiting 1-2 years for each child, the best strategy is to mate with as many females as possible as long as they are moderately to highly attractive in terms of what is coined "reproductive fitness" in the scientific community. Mathmatically this increases the male primates % of offspring that go on to reproduce compared to locking in with one partner.
It is worth noting that with vast enhancements of health care the ideal males strategy is becoming outdated overtime - even though males generally still instinctively crave it fiercly - allowing for the likelihood of needing to produce less offspring for more to reach reproductive age and assure gene continuation. This is the reason why as people become wealthier the number of kids produced generally decreases in richer socioeconomic famlies - more eggs can be in one basket still with low risk vecause access to halthcare and nutrition and safety are much higher. So better developed offspring may become the beet option compared to volume which cause more of the males resources to be split across multiple kids rather than all invested into one or two as the family unit gets wealthier in certain parts of the world.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions