Know the difference!
Asking for money before and after sex is gold digging. Sometimes even without sex.
But traditional women were gold diggers too. They didn't earn no money and used to live off of their husbands income. So if a mans job was to provide women's job was to sit around and dig gold
In modern day though if you have a big dick she may pay you instead.
Modern day is sad. Women aren't always looking for money though. She might take money from her rich partner and still prostate before the big D.
So are you getting your money's worth?
Most Helpful Opinions
Yeah but guys go with beauty and that will never change. Money is a tool and is exchangeable for young girl and great sex. Old guys are especially that way as they have seen more of the cold hard world. They appreciate beauty and seeming innocence. That's why older guys are easy targets for money chasers that are hot !!
Yes, and it is their fault to approach women who are beyond what they can afford. It is not that we call them to date us. They are obviously attracted to a high maintenance woman because of their look yet blame her for shovelling them.
I just believe one can buy cute things at a lower price as well. Designer clothes, accessories etc. are good if you can afford them yourself but not if you expect someone else to pay for you.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
14Opinion
No. There are no differences. Men need to stop enabling women treating men as ATM.
There is only one reason why women look at men's finance : they expect to benefit from his money. So they are gold diggers. Those women, including you, know perfectly they are gold diggers. If not you would tell the men you date : "one of the reason I date you is because you make a lot of money"
If my girlfriend wants something she should pay it herself. If she want to live with me, she should pay half of all bills. If she wants to buy a house with me, she should pay half of the price.
Everyone's tastes are beyond their budget. In that we would all love things we cannot afford. Responsible people simply adjust their tastes to be within their budget.
As such the only difference between a gold digger and a woman who refuses to adjust their taste within her means is the gold digger is more responsible and thus also desirable.yes. that is perfectly fair and as well, respectful of the woman to know her boundaries. It's a little bit assumptive because it's based on his current state and not future potential. But I tend to think women look at "drive" passion and take that into account at least some of the time.
Some guys will be ok with that, and others will make accusations because it's an easy justification for their rejection to blame her for her standards.
Um no. That's basically the same thing. There is a difference between a gold digger and a traditional SAH woman. But tastes beyond my budget? Sounds like tastes beyond your budget. This is 2023, men don't have to buy women shit since they have their own jobs.
The line between gold digger and high maintenance is very thin.
yes, there is some truth to this.
When you see a 20 something with a rich 80 year old you know it isn't because of his looks.If she got expensive tastes then she can buy it herself, if she’s so independent.
Trying to put a fancy spin on Gold Digger doesn't change the fact that she's a Gold Digger. Only difference between them is one doesn't like being called a Gold Digger but knows she is one.
Then maybe she should provide those things herself.
Can she afford the tastes herself? If not it sounds like a difference without a distinction.
If her tastes are beyond his budget then she should fund her own endeavors, if she truly loves him she wouldn't expect her to spend lavishly on her beyond his earnings.
So long she doesn't use him so much for money.
Of course. Know the difference for sure.
I'll bet you reek of cat urine.
I agree
Nope, lol.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!