Do you think it's worse to prioritize wealth in a partner or good looks in a partner? Is it even bad? Why or why not?

[Jammaa]

[molonski2]

Wealth is extremely important , like it or not , particularly if you reside in the USA so there is nothing wrong with giving wealth priority , it makes great sense.

If I were going over again , wealth , stability , employment , family , would be what I focus on , or I simply would not marry and have children if I didn't have these boxes ticked , you simply can never marry down in economic status , that's a mistake.

[Juxtapose]

As long as they can pay their half of the rent you shouldn't be worried about their finances unless you're looking towards having kids.

Sexuality is what separates friendship from romance. So yeah, looks too matter but if you lean on it too much then your relationships are going to be superficial and end as soon as somebody ends up in a horrific accident that scars them.

[madewithingredients]

"Sexuality is what separates friendship from romance" the last time I said that to a woman it did not go well lol.

[Juxtapose]

@madewithingredients I tell that to my female friends and a lot of them agree.

You should find women who are more intellectual and can detach from their emotions.

[Juxtapose]

But then again they are few and far between, hard to date as well because they are independent.

[Nikki1989]

Both are bad and largely self-defeating.

[AI Opinion]

Well, darling, diving right into the juiciest of discussions! Choosing between wealth and good looks in a partner is like deciding between chocolate and vanilla – it's all about your taste, but either way, it's going to be sweet if you do it right. Here's the scoop: neither is inherently bad; it's the intention and balance that spice things up or cause a disaster.

If you're solely prioritizing wealth, you might find yourself rich in materials but poor in connection. Money can't snuggle you at night or understand your deepest fears. On the flip side, banking everything on good looks is like a candle burning at both ends – fiery and bright but not lasting forever.

The main dish? A relationship should be a balanced meal, not just eye candy or a fat wallet. Seek someone whose values align with yours, who makes your heart race for the right reasons, and perhaps can also be your adventure partner both in the jungle and in the urban maze. The secret ingredient? Love, respect, and genuine connection. Now, that's a recipe for success! 😉

[Likes2drive]

If you prioritize wealth then you probably won’t be compatible with each other unless you find someone you actually like for them and at least with looks you’ll be attracted to them but just like looks, if they lose their money are you going to leave them since you didn’t go for personality?

[LiamJHayden]

People can prioritize whatever they want. I prioritize loyalty and common interests.

[Jammaa]

So just to clarify, do you think there's nothing wrong about either?

[NYlatefun]

Wealth? Sounds like gold digging.
I get that women may want a partner with financial security or if they’re too young with financial potencial. But wealth means a certain amount that’s way beyond the norm.

[TheSpaceGnome]

Prioritizing wealth is bad and should not be done, but prioritizing both looks and mental compatability is required.

[Billlewis]

I don't think it's a bad thing at all, and I actually have a real weakness for women who are actively and openly seeking guys to spoil them, with no strings attached;)

[Billlewis]

I apologize for being so persistent, but I'd consider it a tremendous privilege to spoil you and your husband a little from t to time. Why? Because you so clearly deserve it and there is nothing that makes more sense than acknowledging your magnificent presence, in my humble, meaningless opinion. Thank you very much for your consideration, Goddess.

[Anonymous]

Neither one is bad. They are both just human nature, and totally normal. Both men and women have preferences and there's nothing wrong with that.

The problem is... men are honest about what's important to them, and women are NOT.

[bowenw]

Probably looks as they will eventually fade. I

[SotiCoto]

Prioritising wealth is playing into the hands of Capitalism... so it is far FAR worse.

[Anonymous]

No unless you wish to benefit from that wealth, I look to wealth as that means they are less problematic economically usually

[handsomelad70]

I'd prioritize good looks over wealth, though I can't see myself with a homeless or VERY poor broad. (For starters, you can't publicly club a homeless chick !!!)

[Anonymous]

It is bad but it's just the way things are, women prioritize wealth and men prioritize good lucks.

[DarkLegacy]

Both are terrible things for a woman to do

[DextroShade]

Looks, I don't give a damn about her money.

[OtterMan68]

equally bad

[Bluegreen3737]

Together