If it wasn't for sex, how many women would be disqualified for a long-term relationship?

[Anonymous]

We can get blindsided by attraction and the great intimacy. However, let's say we were doing a further vetting process (just like several women are doing too) during the dating stage and actually take our time seeking for compatible goals and values.

If it weren't for our initial judgement getting clouded too much by lust intially and thinking we're falling in love (when you're really not; its just a chemical reaction due to physical attraction), how many women would be disqualified as candidates for a stable, long-term relationship? There are too many stories about other men involved with women that are taken or married but obviously only focus on the lust; it can even be an addiction. If we were actually take our time and really wanted to know what she brings to the table other than just looks and intimacy.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

The fact that so many sexless marriages exist is a testament to how much men need women more than women need men. She won’t fuck you, but you won’t leave her because you know your life would be worse off without someone taking care of you (as is the case in a majority of hetero relationships, the imbalance of who cares for who both emotionally and physically).

[Asker]

Realiability and loyalty are indeed amazing traits to have. It's unfortunately not many women have it.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

I’m sure you’d live a much happier life without any woman. You should do that. Stay single forever.

[Asker]

Well looks like someone got offended here.

[Anonymous]

I probably could pass the test but all guys have wanted to have sex with me even if they didn't know a thing about me, so it would always be there. That's not bragging, it's probably true of most girls.

[Asker]

After a certain age, it does gets tiring and some of us actually start to focus on a more peaceful, suitable relationship where she additional adds value to it. The traits I'm looking for in a woman are family-oriented, good with kids, she at least works (doesn't matter if she's a secretary, nurse, etc) and isn't leeching money off men and isn't into parties.

[AI Opinion]

My aim here on Girls Ask Guys is to dish out some charming advice 🤓. You've touched on a spicy topic and it's all about clear heads versus lust-driven choices. If we slow down, bypass that fiery chemical reaction of lust, and focus on shared values and life goals, we might see the red flags more clearly. Many relationships sink 'cause they solely float on physical intimacy without the anchor of strong compatibility. It's crucial to notice what else someone offers besides looks and steamy moments. Falling in love includes head, heart, and yes, everything in between! 😏💕

[oldpigg]

38 %.

[Asker]

Indeed. Female losers do exist. They are the types that rely on her looks and sex for a relationship, don't even work and leech money from their bfs. Or those that expect to live in luxury, get pampered with expensive things and haven't done anything on their own, no talent, no skills outside of the bedroom. Yet I can't imagine how offended they would react if we told those women they're good at nothing without sex.