Polls: Relationships

suppose those sex robots will grow in demand (there are hundreds of interested customers already, most of which are men) will that make women a bit more competitive towards those machines?
for example what can the women do, that the sex robots can't, that makes them the better romantic and sexual companion? I know this question can be easily answered but the philosophy behind it is, that in some ways the sex robot can be the better choice depending on the woman (for instance a sex robot doesn't want our money, gifts, doesn't nag, doesn't get angry over stupid things, apologizes when it realized it was wrong, doesn't have anger issues and so on). And now I'm asking: could sex robots encourage women to compete with it and be making our women better? Or are women trembled by the rise of the ("SUPERIOR") sex robots so much?

keep in mind, that the more sex robots are sold, the lesser men are going to be available for women for dating. And women need men, right? Because we need women too but when we can't get what we need, we'll find other ways to deal with it, thus the sex robots. Some may keep the sex robot and still go on dating (in which case the sex robot serves as a therapy kind of thing).

Loyalty and friendship are concepts no woman can ever fully understand. It’s not deliberate, it’s in their nature—it’s evolution. A woman will unconditionally love her offspring only—if she is a good mother. Aside from this, women love conditionally and opportunistically. You can’t change that. But once you know it, you can act accordingly.

Consider the stone age; Men hunting during the dawn of humanity needed other men of the tribe to watch their backs during the hunt. That’s why men are naturally inclined to build strong friendships where loyalty is a real value. One weakness that stems from it is that men take things at face value. Especially with women. Only through their own experiences (both successes and failures) men learn to take what women say and do with a pinch of salt.I am convinced this is why female reasoning is based on emotions. By employing a flatulent burst of emotions, a woman most likely gets what she wants. This obvious manipulation is not necessarily a conscious decision, more likely it’s embedded in her nature. It follows that women are incapable of loyalty and friendship towards men, just as men are incapable of giving birth.

The reason people accept the existence of unconditional love script is childhood. Your parents loved you with all their hearts But your woman is not your mom. She is a fickle-minded person who’s most likely looking out for a prettier branch to grab right now.

When she’s madly in love with you because you are the man who rocks her world.

Keep being that man if she makes your life better, or discard her if she doesn’t. So, she loves you because you’re the best high-quality man she can get, but this sooner or later be subject to change. If at some point she feels she can get a man perceived as higher quality than you, her love for you will decrease exponentially. This is what we call conditional love—a woman’s love.
Ps -Feminists and manginas, its not to offend women. I'm discussing evolutionary point of view.

Don't get me wrong, you still love them and all but sometimes they could be so much better than they choose to be. Maybe you could be better too, but you just see how great they could be. If only they tried a little harder and understood what you were trying to convey to them before they put their foot in their mouth. Or they didn't follow through on something that would've made them happier in their life. But they're still human, you know this, which is why you kinda understand what people meant when they say "I love Him/Her, Flaws and All." But you still have hope in them and for them. Are you expecting too much and not loving as much?

(I don't even know if I'm making sense right now)

My girlfriend is bigger than me and most of my friends have dater bigger girls at least once. My girlfriend is always on top in bed and once she even broke the bed while fucking me because of the impact.




Are women physically stronger than men nowadays? My girlfriend makes me feel so haha

So is it an outdated social convention. Or is it still the best part of romance, and a way to show permanent Undying love to the world.

Personally I believe in Undying love and I think that marriage is the ultimate way of showing that to the world. The only thing I consider few more permanent than marriage is a tattoo. Haha. But somehow I believe that I am strangely Outnumbered these days.

Many people these days view marriage has more of a sort of 10 maybe 15 year arrangement. And the question there is why enter into a permanent Bond with an exit strategy. Others are choosing to skip the convention all together seeing it is only an unnecessary legal tax break and a way to appease one's family and simplify the answer to questions about your love life.

A lot of my friends are getting married and it seems like every wedding there will be guys sitting at the bar betting on how long this one will last. It's said jokingly but it seems that people don't see marriage as a permanent thing anymore. Therefore if it's not permanent then what is it?

Note. If you reply with a textbook or dictionary response/ definition to the word marriage. Then you're a bloody moron! I am asking about the convention of marriage and it's role within Society within Society. Everybody knows what marriage is!!!

Cause they are so comfy?