Why do Christians argue that some things are immoral when the Bible doesn't condemn them?

[Anonymous]

Isn't the Bible where Christians get their morality? So how can they argue race mixing for example is wrong?

[strateguy632]

because morality is not only from bible it is from application of bible ideas and things similar to sins are also bad.
just because you catch me stealing, does not mean i was wrong to say you should not steal, in fact i was still right to say the truth.

also some stuff is included in the bible because of the idea, even if people invented different words to pretend the actions are different. "i was only tasting not stealing" as some say in food shops. where does bible say you can't taste? but it is included. do not kill who said a fetuss is not included?

[Asker]

That just sounds like manipulation to fit your wants and needs, moral relativism

[jshm2]

You're confused.

There are two main branches of Christianity, the Protestants and the Catholics.

The Catholics get their direction and morality from the Pope and church. The Protestants get their morality from their pastors and the Reformation in the 16th century.

Both are not interchangeable and both only take "guidance" from the bible. Church Canon supersedes Biblical law (which is mostly Jewish Halakha reinterpreted) anyway

[LadyKitty]

a lot of Christians follow the bible but they don't practice what they preach and a lot of them cherry pick and add different things in.

[Anonymous]

hasn't the bible been rewritten by man countless times? probably has some play on the inconsistencies people so often question

[strateguy632]

nah we have ancient documents

[Opinion Owner]

which were written by man. no?

[Agape93]

Most Christians have never fully ready the Bible.

[handsomelad70]

Because many are judgmental busy bodies.

[jahaims]

It's all imaginary so it is open to interpretation