What do you think the difference is?

[Anonymous]

I have never heard one person in my life say dinosaurs never existed but I have heard more than one person in my life say God never existed

[strateguy632]

Just kuz you didn't hear yet is no proof. I personally know 3! Who deny dinosaurs!

They never saw a whole dinosaur, only seeing is believing. Not blind faith in any book.

Those who say "God never existed" are just gaslighting people, To trigger people (which liberals usualy forbid called trolling.)

Anyway, That caused many people to say that.

[Orion84]

The difference is proof.

We can verify that dinosaurs exist, we can see the evidence, and make scientific analyses of their remains.

God, by definition, is a matter of faith, rather than empirical proof. Many people don't accept things on faith.

[juliaanita]

That kind of makes sense, doesn't? Skeletons of dinosaurs exist. Im still waiting for a skeleton of god

[jshm2]

You need to clean your ears, then.

Plenty of Christians and Jews assert dinosaurs didn't exist, and God does.

[slatyb]

We know dinosaurs existed. We have thousands of fossils of dinosaur bones and many complete skeletons. God is just a character in a fairy tale.

[Ironic_Method]

Because there's verifiable evidence that dinosaurs existed, there is none for God.

[Wise4myage]

That's very true.