Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Probably not, but it's also common practice for various cultures and peoples to depict Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary as one of their own.
There are at least two images in this link that date back to at least the early 20th Century. The last image, Our Lady of Guadalupe, dates back to 1531.
While I can't stand Spike Lee, I always liked this scene from Malcolm X.
Opinion
5Opinion
You realize Rome controlled the Middle East in the time of Jesus right? Rome as in White people from Europe... Judea was a Roman province. Israel was not a big fan of being ruled by Rome at the time, but it was a fact of life. Many Israelites from Judea lived and worked throughout the Roman empire (Europe) and spoke Koine Greek at the time in addition to Hebrew. Koine Greek was the common tongue of the time in the Middle East, the aristocracy of the region spoke Latin. It wouldn't be until 600 years later when Muslims would rape and pillage their way through the Middle East, Africa, and parts of southern Europe that the Middle East woulds get it's current look and feel. It use to be run by the White man, but you win some and you lose some and people colonize your land when you get pushed out.
You asking if Jesus looked like the popularized European White Jesus and trying to suggest otherwise, would be like people questioning if Sitting Bull really looked the way he did, and then suggesting that he looked more like an Englishman given he was from the United States of America which was a set of English colonies. It's comical.
Or it would be like trying to discredit the image of Shaka kaSenzangakhona (Shaka Zulu) and say he wasn't really Black, he must of been a White Englishman since they colonized South Africa. Clearly they Blacks just want to modify the image of Shaka Zulu in their likeness to relate to him more. You anti-Christ faggots need to get a new hobby.
He was a Jew of Israel, and would've most likely had olive skin, brown hair and green or brown eyes. Neither pale white nor ebony black.
What ethnicity He has is not what is important. He is popularly depicted as white because it is of simple familiarity to the ethnicity which has championed and defended Christianity for a thousand years, the people of Europe.
LOL, Jesus changes image depending on if the Christian is Black, Jewish, White or Hispanic!
No one knows how he looks like?
They only made pics with imagination
Why not? Plenty of jews are white.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions