Search Results: if men had to be pregnant

I'm 37, childless but I've been speaking to a companion for a long while now. We've already spent quality time (no sex yet) and are thinking of settling down soon. I always thought getting pregnant by a boyfriend that later on cheats or never commits is worse. If I can have kids in the right manner so beat it. I'm unwilling to bring an innocent child misery.

In the end, out of the two less favorable positions for a woman would my position (older and childless) be better than be younger and already with 2-3 kids of different men?

Obviously both genders have their own different challenges. What might be an advantage to one gender isn't to the other. But honestly what do you it's worse?

- A man (ages 25+) never getting a girlfriend and remains dateless; a virgin. Maybe he might have wanted a family but he's not having any luck at all. Yet, he won't pay for sex.

- A woman that can't get a keeper on time (she had a couple bfs but neither of them ever propose, all of them are just into shacking up, the romance and sex but not commitment) and either her fertile years are drained if she remains childless or she ends up pregnant with a boyfriend and at a higher risk of being a single mother. Then having a child with a man that wouldn't commit reduces her dating pool of suitable keepers even more.