Search Results: he likes me intelligence

Please keep in mind that in the US, domestic terrorism involves ideologically driven crimes intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy, primarily within the US, and is not a specific federal offense, but rather prosecuted under existing laws.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Definition:

The FBI and DHS, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, have developed standard definitions of terminology related to domestic terrorism and uniform methodologies for tracking domestic terrorism incidents.

Not a Specific Federal Offense:

While the federal government defines domestic terrorism, it's not a standalone crime that can be charged. Instead, domestic terrorism cases are prosecuted under existing laws, such as those related to violence, threats, or destruction of property.

Focus on Ideology:

Domestic terrorism is characterized by acts driven by a domestic ideological goal, such as political, religious, social, racial, or environmental motivations.

Intent to Intimidate or Coerce:

The key element is the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy or conduct.

Examples:

This could include acts of violence, threats, or destruction of property targeting government facilities, infrastructure, or civilians.

Federal Agencies Involved:

The FBI and DHS are the primary federal agencies responsible for COUNTERING NOT PROSECUTING domestic terrorism.

State-Level Laws:

Some states have their own domestic terrorism laws, which may define the offense and prescribe penalties.

HATE CRIMES:

Please also keep in mind that hate crimes per statute are against protected classes of people, not businesses.

I have a theory that very few white people across all history literally think black people attach the ape like comparison in simple ways that is assumed. it’s more an symbolic association with what white people think of their energy, things like the way they vibe and their intelligence, but not that they are ape like in that way. When it happens it’s more like they can see certain facial features that remind them of it
(When certain skull features are present, not just skin color or hair) but since they look too human (upright, human amount of body hair) the brain shifts it’s perspective of them being ape like to humans, and they attach things like being hypersexual, not as intelligently inclined in certain areas, and an assumption that they are or may be aggressive in situations. But thinking they are ape like simply from looks alone is not such a simple one to one connection. It’s more their perceived energy from what I just described.

I believe black people actually are more likely to think this of themselves and they project it onto white people, both today and their perception of the past, when in reality the animalistic association was about black peoples perceived energy and connection to nature which they thought was different, looks may have played a major role but not not in such a simple ape like connection, they saw them as human but with different energy based on looks, not that they were more ape like because of their looks in such a way that is assumed.

And some white people may imagine other white people think this since they can conjure up that thought in their head but they don’t actually think that when seeing black people, their thought process is what I described.


*disclaimer, this isn’t meant to put black people down, I am describing real dynamics that are helpful to address both for the black community to understand these dynamics so they know how they are seen by white people and society as well.

They would be popular for the duration of life, like even after high school and such.