Search Results: race

1, note: just test scores here, but from me no judgement.
average iq of european race: clusters around 100. Germany 99 like denmark iq 99 in cluster. european-americans did better 103, but less than hundreds of Asian kids who scored 107 (109 and 105 averages). this separate cluster PROVED separate races.
not by far [within standard deviation of 15 and a difference of 4. just showed a separate race but not by far]. that means a bit more inteligent in "ability for reasoning" as above but not a lot smarter but noticeably smarter.
2, gap between japan kids 107 to korea kids 103+ 102 is cluster near 105. gap to Europe cluster germany 99. denmark 99 as above this PROVED separate races. separate clusters.
for example kenya 63 near sudan score 64, not verbal test, just visual and non-verbal reasoning ability. maybe generations of mal-nourishment caused this fact.
these cluster near 64 so proof not same race as the cluster of 99 in Europe. nor cluster of 104 Asians as above. Asian americans also distinct -keeping distinction: hundreds of kids 106 or 104 in cluster.
3,
the smarter Africans went to college but the split is true. in africa college: locals: 77 but europeans in africa were separate race 105 similar to japan.
African American were 85 and 86 in non verbal test, between African 77 to european-american 99 as above.
this is consistent with musical ability- noticing sound tones etc. African americans were less than europeans in musical tone sounds, except for keeping drum rythm. this can give new meaning to "jazz" -no offence just facts.
so when we observe empirical data that show separate races and some better at sports others better at reasoning, why do political correct "scientists" sacrifice integrity? poll?

4, Want more details?

Too few Americans know history and the number is declining with every generation. They don't know that the purpose of the US Constitution, the most copied constitution in the history of the human race, was not to tell US citizens what they can and cannot do but to tell the newly founded United States federal government what IT can and cannot do. The purpose of the document was to put strict LIMITS on the power of the federal government so that it could not tread on the rights of individual citizens to pursue their own lives in the way THEY desire not the way some government bureaucrat wants them to live.

The founders knew that there is no such thing as a big government that is also a benevolent government. They know that the bigger the government, the smaller the citizen and they tried to put as many safeguards in that document as possible to restrict the government from overstepping its bounds and involving itself in citizens' lives to a degree that exceeds the minimal necessary to maintain a civil society.

But over the years, the government has gone so far beyond the boundaries of the Constitution that those who created is would not even recognize the country today. Through influence by big government socialists and communists, who believe that government is the answer to all problems, it has taken on far more power over the people than that document ever granted them. It's hard to put the genie back in the bottle but at least this administration is trying to make the structural changes that are necessary to begin down that path. Since President Trump took office, government jobs have been cut and private sector jobs have reached the highest level in US history.

Is what the founders believed still true: that the bigger the government the smaller the citizen?