Search Results: i respect you

I have read that many people who have not shown sufficient respect for the memory of Charlie Kirk have been fired from their jobs at the urging of right-wing operatives. Will this trend extend to those who criticize the current Republican administration? If so, would that be reasonable or legal?

It seems that we might be finally losing our rights to free speech. Do you agree, or do you think this is an overreaction?

This is a question i never thought i would have to ask.. But in recent the trump team has assigned the removal of slavery history specifically the bad sides of it from national parks and museums.

www.washingtonpost.com/.../

While the depictions and evidence of the literal scars of slavery are being removed from museums and national public spaces. Trump's team supports renaming forts back to the people who were on the side of the confederacy... let me make this absolutely clear. The confederacy wanted to keep slavery legal. To support confederate members and its confederate flag, is a support for slavery. Yes I get that some people claim the confederate flag is a symbol for southern pride.. but be real, its for the support of slavery.

Reinstating confederate names to Places like
Fort Barfoot
instead of honoring a medal of honor recipient that has no ties to the confederacy they chose to name it after a confederate army general George Edward Pickett

Fort Eisenhower
being changed to Fort Gordon, instead of honoring Dwight D. Eisenhower a former president who didn't support slavery, they instead chose someone that supported the confederacy. However with respect to Gordon's accomplishments in the war. Still Gordon was on the side that supported slavery.

Fort Gregg Adams
The current trump team wants to rename it back to Fort Robert E Lee, a confederate general. It was named Fort Gregg Adams, for Lt. Gen Arthur Gregg and Lt. Col. Charity Adams accomplishments in the military and they didn't have ties to the confederacy.

But I think you get the point.
Why allow so much confederacy praising in an america that doesn't want slavery?

I'm just curious. The fictional Vicar of Dibley, a fictional clergy person, was always of warm good cheer and humble humility and good humour - and aware of secular sensibilities and making life fun. And modern. While still holding the values of traditional attire, respect. The basics, duh, still. 📺 👀 Praise the good lordy lord, who surely does provide. Shrug, I guess we'll find out in coming months - who's the next Archbishop of Canterbury not to be mistaken for Cadbury chocolate 🍫 👀

Obviously, Supreme Court justices are experts when it comes to interpreting the Constitution. They have undergone extensive legal training. But it seems that lots of people only selectively respect their decisions. I feel like lots of non-experts believe Supreme Court decisions should only be respected when they conform to ideological biases. For example, conservative Republicans slam the Supreme Court when they rule against Trump, but seem to love the Supreme Court when the justices side with him. Liberal Democrats of course do the opposite. What do you think?