Search Results: believing what he says

LETS NOT HAVE A DISCUSSION OF HOW MANY GENDERS THERE ARE OR IF ITS FLUID!! Just chime in on the parties!

More than one-third (35%) of Americans say these parties are “unnecessary,” 30% say they’re “trendy,” 28% say they’re “silly,” and another 28% say they’re a “fad,” 27% say "self indulgent" and 25% say "fun" according to new data from YouGov Omnibus.

In USA America, generational attitudes toward gender reveal parties vary significantly:

Millennials: Millennials, who popularized gender reveal parties in the late 2000s, often view them as fun and celebratory events, fueled by social media trends. However, some millennials have grown critical of the concept for reinforcing gender stereotypes.

Gen X: Many Gen X individuals see gender reveal parties as unnecessary or overly elaborate, often blaming social media for their rise. Some perceive them as shallow or attention-seeking.

Baby Boomers: Boomers tend to be more skeptical or indifferent toward the trend. They are less likely to understand its appeal and may view it as a modern fad driven by younger generations.

Gen Z: With half of Gen Z believing gender is a spectrum, they are more likely to criticize gender reveal parties for enforcing binary concepts of gender. They may prefer celebrations that focus on broader aspects of parenthood rather than traditional gender norms.

I say refined because I asked a similar question before but this is refined.

I believe that all races are equal in intelligence, but I also believe that once someone of a race reaches pioneer level intelligence, the intelligence in expressed in different ways.

For example, I believe black people, when they reach a pioneer level of intelligence, tend to live a less materialistic life compared to other races. Think of the very smart tribe leaders in Africa who have knowledge of cells and science, but still choose to live that life.

I believe Asians (particularly from oriental regions) have a bit of a balance

And Europeans are most likely to use materialism like technology to satisfy their happiness, when they are that smart, (unlike other groups)

Just to be clear it isn’t that I don’t believe they are intelligent in those fields at that stage? But with Africans for example the information on how to make technologically mostly exists as knowing the concept, and maybe imagining the technology without actually coming down to needing to build it.

I also believe that the reason why European and Asians tend to be more technologically than blacks at pioneer level intelligence is because their native lands are colder. So they have materialism (like shelter, and material conveniences to compensate to survive.)

I also believe that’s why Europeans look the way that they do, it’s because they are expressing survival in a more primitive way, like more tangible to people, because of their colder land. And primitive survival ties to reproduction in the primitive part of the brain.
While blacks and Asians (and those in between the scale) tend to have a look that is more like they are holding ancient knowledge of the rhythms of the earth.

Also non white races do contribute to society even in their tribal states, it’s just that most people are blind to how to help’s because it taps into natural rhythms rippling through collective humanity.

The Vances oppose abortion for religious reasons, but tends not to mix that subject with the birthrate conversation except to say that with all the new restrictions on reproductive choice, it would make sense to do more for young mothers financially.

Rather than religious belief, Musks supporters are motivated by a fear that humanity will not replace itself. They dismiss immigration as a remedy, arguing that it can weaken the culture of the receiving country.

This Musk aligned group, which embraces assisted reproduction, is most visibly identified with Malcolm & Simone Collins, a media-friendly couple with 4 children born through IVF. They favor using genetic selection to pick embryos with desirable characteristics, an approach that Christian groups typically oppose. The Collinses said they recently composed a suite of suggested executive orders and sent them to allies in the White House. They include deregulating child care businesses to bring down the cost, and loosening car seat laws, which can now require buying larger vehicles to accommodate more than two children. Another would create an award for women who have six or more children, versions of which exist in a handful of countries, including France.

An agenda that prioritizes large families makes plenty of people queasy. Groups like Population Connection worry that the tactics required to raise birthrates can verge on authoritarianism, and believe that the consequences of population loss aren’t as catastrophic as pronatalists make them out to be. And increasing numbers of young people do not want to burden the planet by having children of their own.

Nevertheless, pro-natalists want the administration to establish a commission to elevate and study the subject, as well as to infuse their priorities across the federal government. The Biden administration screened many policies and grant applications for their impact on climate change and racial equity, they point out; the same could be done for procreation.