Search Results: no sexual activity

Hi everyone, I'm new here, but I need some advice. I'd really appreciate advice from fellow Christians on this. As well, as non-Christians, too. Please be respectful to my faith, is all I ask.
I'm a 35 year old Christian male, I met this woman (31) through a Christian app called Upward, which is a very nice Christian app. We instantly hit it off, and went to snapchat, talked/video chatted every morning and night for around 4-6 hours or more for about four months straight. She was staying with her sister in TN. She's originally from Florida. I live in KY. Fast-forward to June, she left to go see her other sister, and then back down to Florida to empty storage units she had. I don't feel she has ever been a super loving, sweet woman, but when she got back to Florida her personality went from a 6-7 on harsh, to what I feel is like a 8 or 9. As June progressed, I started becoming very stressed about her. My bloodpressure started having bad spikes. She would say she's crying, and having bad dreams about her ex. When she was in TN, she'd always ask me to not leave, and leave the webcam on while she slept. I obliged, and done this A LOT, would just pray or read the Bible for an hour until I was sure she was sound asleep.(Just to be clear, we did no sexual activity together. I'm a virgin, and staying that way until marriage.) Everything I basically said to her as she's in Florida started to be wrong, not right, and this is the conversation, which was the last straw. I could no longer take it, and that night I blocked her, except from my phone. She wasn't able to sleep early morning of this day, and I was working out. I stopped my workout, and helped her talk about her ex for around an hour or two, for she could fall back to sleep. This was that afternoon, when I was exhausted, and wanted to take my shower and then sleep. This is just one conversation. This is the first woman I've ever dated. Is this normal?

Part 1

Under such concept, all violent sexual activities, such as rape and molestation and sexual harassment, would vanish from existance.
As a tax, all peaceful, consensual sexual activities would disappear as well.
Children could still be made by an alternative method, by the means artificial construction, and there would be no genetical disadvantages attached to it.

Would you take such deal, or reject it?

In George Orwell's novel 1984, the Oceanian social relationships are divided in three classes:
- The Inner Party, which makes 2% of the population and holds all the power, but its members are liable to be overthrown and replaced by Outer Party members if they aren't loyal enough. Inner Party members are entitled to tidy living quarters, luxuries and can marry and have children almost freely, but their children aren't automatically allowed in the Inner Party.
- The Outer Party, the middle class, which enforces and control the policy decided by the Inner Party. Despite being the middle class, the members of the Outer Party are seen as the worst off of the three classes. They lack the Proles' relative personal freedom and simple pleasures, and also lack the Inner Party members' luxurious lifestyle and privileges in the form of food, sweets, servants, or even motor vehicles. They can't choose who to marry and any kind of romantic and sexual activity must be authorized beforehand.
- The Proles, which make the 85% of the population, they are menial workers and live in poverty, holding no political power. They are considered to the extent of animals and due to this are rarely under surveillance, they have personal and sexual freedom and aren't required to wearing an uniform. The downside of their condition are the hours of menial and backbreaking work and the possibility of being sent in war to die.

So, who do you choose?