Search Results: guys who are overweight

Men: Would you rather be a 5'11"/180 cm, fit, athletic-bodied, all-natural 34DD white woman in her 20s who makes seven figures as a model or actress or other professional (including sex work)?

Or would you rather stay a man, but you're short (under six feet), overweight, very unhealthy, ugly, have a small penis, have some kind of non-debilitating medical condition (diabetes, low blood sugar, etc.), and can barely pay the bills every month or homeless, but you're still a man.

If a guy who was short, fat, and unattractive goes to the gym 3-5 days a week, absolutely despises going there, and never loses any weight, is it worth still doing it? Especially if the main goal of going is to have a more attractive body by losing weight? Especially if it won't help them grow any inches or make their face look any better?

Which would you rather be?

Option A: A guy who earns $200 an hour doing an easy job that you love, but is considered ugly, short (< 6'), overweight, has a small dick (6" or less), and will NEVER have a consensual sexual or partner your entire life.

Option B: A guy who earns about $10 an hour doing an annoying-but-manageable 9-to-5 job, but is considered extremely attractive, tall (6'2"+), naturally fit with little effort to maintain, has a big dick (8"), and can get almost anyone who's single and compatible with you based on your looks and charisma.

You cannot "upgrade" your situation into being better. What your scenario is, is pretty much, set in stone for at least a couple decades. Any whiny nitpicky BS in the comments is getting deleted.

WHICH ONE WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE AS YOUR SERIOUS, COMMITTED GIRLFRIEND?
The follow-up question to the one from two weeks ago. You get two women to choose from.

Option A is a girl you find out is named Alicia. She is flawlessly beautiful and has a nearly perfect body, like a fictional character rather than someone who's actually real. Easily can be considered a Nine, if not an outright Ten. She's 5'10"/178 cm, a college athlete, a "master at sex," and works hard to maintain her figure. However, she is very superficial and a perfectionist. She is very hard to please, conceited and only thinks of herself, and expects you to live up to her lofty, high standards at all times, or she will dump you and publicly embarrass you while doing it. Commit to her lifestyle, or you're gone.

Option B is a girl you find out is named Bodhika. She's not what you'd consider physically attractive, at all. Whatever your personal standards are, she's halfway towards the opposite of them. But she could maybe be "good enough" as far as looks go. She's 5'5"/165 cm, has small breasts, narrow hips, a small booty, and is slightly overweight. She is studying to be a doctor. She has noticed you around the neighborhood and really likes you. She's kind, sweet, affectionate, has a really good sense of humor, quite intelligent, nonjudgmental, and accepts you for all your flaws and quirks. You might even have some hobbies in common, as well. You'll likely just never find her to be physically attractive (unless she undergoes extensive cosmetic surgery, which she is unwilling to do).

Which girl do you pick? The 10/10 with high standards, or the 5/10 who accepts you as you are right now?

Inspired by @siseñor girl's question.