Everyday All American Heroes👌👌👌 (Page 2)

[Aiko_E_Lara]

"American heroes" i've seen all of those everywhere

[GreatnessBack]

So, why are you showing only blacks being arrested in the police photos?

[White-American89]

I dont see color.

[GreatnessBack]

You can see facial features, though?

[White-American89]

That's racist

[young_old_soul]

Great take. I agree with it completely, although you did forget a lot of blue collar professions.

[Anonymous]

I agree on all of those, please add doctors to the list.

[Kenwoodman]

The world would be a better place without American army that invades the other countries and as a result terrorism raises in them

[Pink2000]

You know you wrong for that...

[EMed0550]

Please enlighten us on how that is my little snowflake.

[EMed0550]

That's what I thought..

[Pink2000]

@EMed0550 I’m not gonna entertain you

[BrookieCookie0422]

I love all of this 👍❤️ God bless America 🇺🇸❤️

[Pink2000]

Ew gross.

[BrookieCookie0422]

@Pink2000 sorry you don’t like it

[Hans222]

Nice take. Respect to all of them :D

[CurvyPryde32]

O'll add one... cooks.. mama gotta eat 🤣

[patrickjvv]

"Fighting the enemies of freedom to providing humanitarian assistance."

Well that is a new way to say, "firing 30mm rounds from an attack helicopter into unsuspecting crowds of civilians."

[hellionthesagereborn]

Yeah that doensn't happen. What kind of fucked up world are you living in? Hell Obama was awful and a war monger but even he never allowed that to happen. You guys just do what ever you can to belittle and insult the US don't you? Are you seriously that jealous or what?

[patrickjvv]

en.m.wikipedia.org/.../July_12,_2007,_Baghdad_airstrike

Cool.

[White-American89]

The soldiers of Bravo Company, 2–16 Infantry had been under fire all morning from rocket-propelled grenades and small arms on the first day of Operation Ilaaj in Baghdad".

[patrickjvv]

Who would have known that an invading force sometimes faces combat.

[White-American89]

Exactly. Look at the civilian casualtie figures during the invasion of Normandy or Finnish invasion of Russia when Finland was part of the AXIS.

[patrickjvv]

Whataboutism. This was a debate tactic frequently used by the Soviet Union's diplomats. It's quite ironic if you think about it.

[White-American89]

Your first comment was whataboutism lol
You gotta own your Nazi past brah.

[patrickjvv]

It literally isn't. And who says I don't? I don't like civilian casualties or nazis. You on the other hand put together an obviously racist, ignorant mytake.

Must be fun living voluntarily in 1984. And I don't mean the year.

[White-American89]

Your grandfather exterminating Jews and slavs was pretty racist Holmes.

[patrickjvv]

He was 3 at the time but thanks for the amusement and for further reinforcing the idea that you're a loony.

[hellionthesagereborn]

So they where not shooting at unarmed civilians like you claimed but defending themselves? Got it. Now we can point to how casualities occur in war, which would be a waste of time because wars always have casualities, but claiming they fired on unarmed civilians is completely inaccurate. Hell you want to criticize the behavior of the few people in that one singular incident, go for it but again, that is completely unrelated to what was stated (and is also not wide spread in our military nor is it something that can be avoided (some people are assholes, this goes for all people (we where not in Iraq because we where invading, we did it because Saddahm, the guy who commited genocide against the Kurds if you recall, had violated multiple treaties and we suspected had nuclear and chemical weapons based upon his refusal to allow UN inspectors into the facilities despite the fact that this was one of the rules he was expected to follow (from when he commited genocide, he should have been tried and executed quite honestly)). So yeah, completely inaccurate.

[patrickjvv]

@hellionthesagereborn On the wikipedia page it literally says: "2 children wounded. 2 reporters dead." Do you not even bother to read things?

As for it being a singular incident. Well let's see.

en.m.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_attacks_on_civilians_attributed_to_United_States_government_forces

I counted about 800 deaths just attributed to these attacks.

It's cute you think the Iraq War was about the WMDs and human rights. I mean why bother findings things out when you can just repeat what you're told.

[White-American89]

It's called collateral casualties. When a bullet is fired from a gun it doesn't stop until it hits something.

[patrickjvv]

Oh yeah kinda like when you drop bombs on civilians, they explode. I get that.

[White-American89]

Exactly. That's what war looks like, to pretend otherwise is a lie.

[patrickjvv]

Yes of course. 9/11 was also ok. It was just islamist terrorists waging war against imperialist America. That's what war looks like, to pretend otherwise is a lie.

[White-American89]

9/11 was a big mistake on their part as it set the middle East on fire.
No 9/11, no war on terror.

[patrickjvv]

How was it a mistake? Osama Bin Laden wanted a war. That's literally why he did it. I don't know why I bother explaining things to rubes.

[White-American89]

Rubes is an offensive racist term. Osama got a war but it didn't turn out the way he thought. Al queda weren't victorious and all their leaders are dead, ISIS took them over and now ISIS are mostly gone. Osama wanted victory not defeat

[patrickjvv]

Yeah maybe read something once in a while. The goal of Al-Qaeda was to goad America to slaughter muslims and get the US government to spend enormous amounts of money on war to economically suffocate the government. Both goals pretty much achieved.

[White-American89]

Read a little further. The goal of Al-Qaeda was to get all infidel forces out of the middle East and all non-Muslim countries espicially American military bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait when we set up bases there during the gulf war and never left, which is why & when Al-Qaeda started attacking the US well before 9/11, after 9/11 They thought that if they killed enough us troops we'd leave like in Vietnam. Al-Qaeda failed and the end result was continued US presence in the middle East, an expansion of military bases and personel in Saudi Arabia & Kuwait, US Control of Afghanistan and us ownership of iraqi and finances as well as given the US government& military an excuse to update the US military equipment & tactics from cold war era to a more modern 21st century military.
So really al-qaeda failed in all its goals which is why it was the victim of a hostile takeover by ISIS.

[Jamie05rhs]

I agree with @White-American89.

[hellionthesagereborn]

I did read it, that's why I know that claiming they fired on a group of civilians is incorrect. Civilians died, in a warzone, that happens, you stated they actively shot into a crowed of unarmed civilians and that is factually incorrect. Did you read it?

[patrickjvv]

@White-American89 "us ownership of iraqi and finances" what does this even mean? ISIL came to power due to the power vacuum left in Iraq in the aftermath of the war and poor handling of the region by US officials.

Al-Qaeda and under control of al-Zawahiri. is still very much active in case you thought the "victim of a hostile takeover by ISIS" thing you invented was real. You can also read their strategy online so you don't have to make up stuff to fit your worldview.

[patrickjvv]

@hellionthesagereborn I guess I'll have to read it for you then.

"The Apache crew saw unarmed men exit the vehicle and move to Chmagh. The Apache crew requested permission to engage."

[hellionthesagereborn]

So you can't read either? Let me give you some of the quotes,"The video, which WikiLeaks titled Collateral Murder, showed that the crew encountered a FIREFIGHT. . ." then it goes on to point out, "In the first strike, the crews of two Apaches directed 30 mm cannon fire at a group of ten Iraqi men, including some ARMED men, standing where INSURGENTS earlier that day had SHOT at an American Humvee with SMALL ARMS FIRE." So as I said, their where civilian casualities, and clearly a huge screw up but they did not actively target known civilians, they did not target "unarmed men" but rather armed men and in a region that had already had insurgents firing on US forces in the region. So my statement not only still stands but is completely vindicated while your statement is, by your own article, proven completely wrong and inaccurate. This of course is before we get into the fact that your argument hinges on one singular event instead of real world DATA i. e. its not a good argument to begin with and the fact that your anecdote also proves you wrong makes it even worse.

[patrickjvv]

@hellionthesagereborn How does that refute anything I said? There were unarmed civilians there and the US Army opened fire on them. They did see the men carried no weapons and in fact had two children sitting in their van, a van which the Apache destroyed. You can watch the video instead of desperately seeking for justification.

It's also not an anecdote, I already provided a list of US military's attacks on civilians since the early 90's, but convincing someone is pretty useless when that someone wants to believe in propaganda.

www.google.com/.../amp

[hellionthesagereborn]

You said they shot into a crowd of unsuspecting civilians and suggested they where unarmed. That was not the case. You also as I pointed out before provided one incident (and you can do this for any army, accidents will happen that's inevitable) to make a blanket claim about American military. So yes its refuted, they where not unarmed, their was a reason for why they did what they did because they had been shot at prior by insurgents etc. All of which you attempted to ignore and claim it was just civilians and they where unarmed etc. So yeah, your using ancedotes, ignoring the prevalence of such occurences in military conflicts not involving the US etc. So I'm guessing your german (based upon what white American is saying), its either that or Scandinavian as those are the two groups who hate America the most, ironic, since they are also so dependent on us for everything (probably just bitter that we had to protect germany from the soviets after WWII (and after stopping germany from gaining its empire that they so desired (though they have done a fairly good job of acquiring one through Bureaucracy (even managed to help destroy several nations in the process with the forced immigration too))). Listen, I'm not interested in the make believe world of a person who hates a nation he doesn't interact with (except when they give large sums of money and protect your borders (because lets face it, you don't have a functional military, were forced to take care of you like your children (and just like teenagers you throw your tempertantrums and act like your superior to us (but I guarantee the second we walk out you'll beg us to come back because that's what children do))). You want to intentionally misrepresent the facts go for it, it won't change reality.

[eshedd]

What about us EMTs 🥺 we exist too

[Hurdleez-Swampede]

Many heroes but some abuse their power for evil.

[Jamie05rhs]

You forgot truck drivers.

[Anonymous]

A country that was founded under slavery and wars , yeah how great it is to have racist cops and evil military that fights other weak countries around the world , the day White House and Pentagon both get destroyed will be the day of happiness.

[White-American89]

You are thinking of dental and southern American countries 😊

[White-American89]

You are thinking of *central*and southern American countries

[name_is_eric]

You forgot the Grand Wizards.

[smileydrb]

A lot of misinformation, racially speaking.🙁

[pizzalovershouse]

not bad 😊

[worldscolide]

Damn right

[Iron_Man]

Nice thread brother

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I'm hardly a hero.