At first blush, I thought you were just a sexist moron which you are but you unintentionally asked a more important question; would the world be a better place without men? Yes. Would the world be a better place without women? Yes. When humans stop reproducing the world becomes a better place. The problem with the way you asked this question and the way people answered is; you people speak as though "the world" is society its not. We weren't even the first animals to inherit this planet, yet we act all high and mighty thinking anything that benefits society somehow benefits the planet, when we have never done anything in the best interest of the world/planetever. If earth was truly ours to own... We would've been here from the beginning we weren't. You could argue feminism and gay marriage benefit society but it doesn't contribute to the world in the slightest we are still selfish creatures, we will still always do whats in the best interest of society and not the planet/world. We still all own homes were animals use to live we still slaughter the weaker species we still remain to be the most vile of all creations. Instead of fixing the problems in society we are trying to colonize mars because the earth is a sinking ship and thats how entitled humans are. We should worship the world, the planet but... instead we worship Our self and others ignoring the fact that earth is the reason we are here. The reason we can enjoy the things we do yet we treat it like our waste land we think our existence is more important than earths that any problem in society is some how a problem with "the world" and not people. WE ARE THE PROBLEM. the world is a beautiful place we are whats ugly we plagued the world and will eventually lead to its demise so yes, the world would be a much better place without men, without women. However human society would not. Human society depends on both male and female to coincide and co-exist. Please stop being so deluded in your thinking there is nothing wrong with the world, there is only something wrong with how we treat the world.
No having no mean in the world would not make the world better.
The evil that men have done would be replaced by women. During slavery white women still beat their slaves and mistreated them. In women prisons women rape inmates. Have you not heard of historical queens that has done things like send armies to kill children, innocent. Isabella of Castile ordered the conversion or exile of their Muslim and Jewish. Elizabeth Báthory a serial killer has killed anywhere from 80- 600 people. Beverley Gail Allitt is an English serial killer one of the 10 most evil women. She was convicted of murdering four children and causing harm to another 6 kids. Queen Mary I of England and how she commanded soldiers to kill protestants which sent 800 Protestant to flea fearing her.
WARNING GRAPHIC VIDEOS AHEAD
I can't post links so just google the title of each thing I post and click first link on best gore website. Search on google with the word best gore.
here's a video of a woman stabbing a man and gutting him and laughing. .
-- Best Gore Man Tortured and Gutted by Woman Who Laughs and Mocks Him During Killing
here's a video of a mom chocking her son
- BestGore Mother Kidnaps Son and Chokes Him on Camera to Torture Her Ex
here's a video of female bullies torturing and gagging a girl till she throws up
-- Bestgore Teenage Girl Bullied and Tortured by Peers in Goias, Brazil
here's a women who beheads a coworkers baby twins
-- Bestgore Woman Beheads Co-Wifeโs Twins in Nigeria
This woman suffocated her own child with pillow
-- Best gore Indonesian Woman Films Herself Suffocating Own Child to Taunt Husband
This question, and namely the pictures given as examples, are misleading. It's almost suggesting that all men are like the ones pictured and therefore that is a reason to rid the world of all of them.
My father is not a Hitler type. He's just a normal guy who loves his family and does everything he can for them. My brother, the same. To say I'd want a world without men, is to say I don't want my father or my brother and in future, my nephew as he grows, in my life, and I'd never say that.
No.
The world would be better without BAD men and BAD women...
There would probably be less wars and crime. Some drawbacks would include:
The need for hard physical labor. There are some women who are cut out for it, but the vast majority do not excel in the more physical trades. I know when my mom went through menopause, she had that AC running in November. She never could tolerate heat, and in my experience women have a greater need for A/C and comfort.
As far as nations are run, I also think the average woman would have a harder time making tough decisions. When it comes to compromise and council, I think they would do well. However, if an absolute decision has to be made in which one group would be happy, and one group would be angry, I'm not sure most could make that decision and become vilified by the loosing side. The absolute decisions if you will, where not everyone will win are better decided by men who have less empathy and more cold hard logic. Again, this isn't scientific, just thoughts on the common behavior men and women tend to exhibit and how it would largely affect society. You always get that one person who is going to list 3 examples, and can't focus on the majority.
You want men gone ok, then say goodbye to most advances in science, medicine, art, music, architecture, religion, society, goverment, exploration, creation of nations and say goodbye to most if not all of the technology you use, because without us none of that would have been invented and say goodbye to yourself because without a man you would cease to exist.
I despise people like you, it's like those idiotic communists that go around cities and towns saying how much they despise capitalism and wishing it was gone meanwhile using all the items made by capitalism. All the while remaining ignorant to the fact that without capitalism everything they have would be gone.
People like you and feminism are much the same as them.
And before you go and blame us for everything get off your damn high horse.
He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.โ
Hopefully your smart enough to understand the meaning.
Opinion
38Opinion
www.thefamouspeople.com/.../leonhard-euler-2.jpg
upload.wikimedia.org/.../...amanujan_-_OPC_-_1.jpg
www.b92.net/.../...534a90ba1e511978239735_orig.jpg
a4.files.biography.com/.../...MzE2MjgwNDg5NDgz.jpg
www-tc.pbs.org/.../einstein-big-idea-merl.jpg
No not neccesarily. Let's just keep in mind some of the great drivers in advancement and betterment of the world also happens to be men also, such as the people upthere above. Stop with this controlled cherry picking tactic of only showing the crude evil men and group us all in it together. Judge people by their content and not by their sex.
In strict speaking, if it's absolutely for the sake of the planet. Yeah the world and nature would be better off without our odd one out species of humans.
img.ifcdn.com/.../...59a6113763748fa8150639d_1.jpg
Yes, because women are always the victims, without men they'd be privileged.
pics.onsizzle.com/...tims-of-war-women-2632515.png
Griselda Blanco - The Black Widow
Elizabeth Báthory โ The Blood Countess
Ranavalona I โ The Mad Monarch of Madagascar
Irma Grese โ The Hyena of Auschwitz
Isabella I of Castile โ The Wicked Queen Of Spain
Wu Zetian โ The Villainous Empress Of China
Valeria Messalina โ The Roman Lolita
Agrippina The Younger โ The Empress of Poison
Queen Mary I of England โ Bloody Mary
I don't know. Would it be?
It's really easy to rely on someone then condemn them for doing a bad job, while you have 0 responsibilities and 0 obligations and only have to sit back and judge everything as beneath your angelic grace.
Men have performed the leader job the most throughout history. So, most of the evil rulers have been men. Derp. But let us not pretend as if women are saints in contrast. Had they the same degree of responsibilities, they would share an equal number of atrocities.
I got bad news for you. You're also human.
The reality of #killallmen is that men are risk takers, they are natural doers, and have a tendency to act when faced with emotional distress.
Now look at the surviver show where they separated men and women into two different camps, the men had shelters food supply and had set up a decent situation. The women on the other hand didn't even have a food supply set up, was stuck in fighting and backstabbing.
Now of course this is a microcosm, but it illustrates the problem. Would you be willing to do the dangerous, or filthy jobs? What about your female friends? Could you put away your emotional response to be able to put yourself in harms way? You see we already have roughly half of the population that is wired to do that. Who are wired to take risks, and are biologically expendable.
Yes men have done some horrible things, they have also done some great stuff...
Nope, the world would be sad. No technology, no classical music, no stylish clothing etc. Without one gender humans would die off. Misandrists definitely wish men wouf not exist. That's their biggest wish, who knows what else is in their twisted minds.
You use photos of men who were evil as if they define men.
Have you forgotten the numerous men who've invented revolutionary things, built wonders from the ground up, discovered big things, sacrificed their lives for bigger causes?
Men need women as much as women need men. Without either, our world would be much much worse (beside the obvious fact that we would go extinct). There must be a plus and negative; two opposites. It brings balance.
NO! In fact we need more good men in order to fight off all the bad men who threaten us. It's always been that way throughout history. Unfortunately, the feminists and the abortion queens have made the good man a dying breed. Enter the Islamofasist hoards with their 4.5 birth rates. That's when these strong liberated feminists will be begging their Islamofasist conquers, "Of course you can rape me but please don't chop my head off. Praise Alla!". Good time ahead. I'm sure...
I'm going to go put on a limb here and say uh nooooo duh.
Most men are amazing humans and needed and good. And I'd lose my friggin mind if I only had to be around women my entire life.
I think the world would be better off without humans in general. But let's not target one sex; we all leave a negative footprint one way or another. Besides, without men, how would we reproduce? We'd die out for sure.
Fuck no. Those men pictured yes they did gruly deadly things but you have to admire their skillset. yes it was not used for good but for evil. Imagine Hitler putting his charisma and leadership, the reason so many people followed him, to good use instead of what he did. The world would probably be in a better place.
The world wouldn't be better without both men and women. That's obvious, it's against nature, and anything which is against nature will extinct. There are both evil men and women, however I believe that Hitler was not evil!
Probably be the same. Women are humans too and as soon as men are out of the picture and not suppressing women anymore y'all will be free to do just as evil things as any men have done. That's because we are all human and we are just evil.
Only psychopaths , like the ones in the pics, but not males in general
This is a stupid question, without men we'd all die out.
The world would be better without shitty people. I personally love men and think the world would be utterly boring without them.
Realistically, women would be permanently stuck in stone age then.
so you hoose stalin and hittler? and not Socrates, Plato, Davinci, Tesla, Fleming, Faraday, Papanicolaou and millions of others that gave you the comforts, science, healthcare and technology you got today?
Why is this even a question? We need men to reproduce. Our entire population would die out.
So ALL women are perfect angels & ALL men are evil , sex crazed , mass murdering rapist bastards by virtue of their ( un chosen ) gender? Please take the GaG stand & present your admissible evidence...
Most Helpful Opinions