We all know that the word "nazi" is just a label that Liberal extremists put on everyone who disagrees with their ideas, it hasn't any other mean nowadays. So... Should we Conservatives group Liberals and put labels on all of them?
Even better: is it OK to punch Liberal extremists who write the most hateful and disrespectful things about White people and preaches violence against us? If they push anti-White narratives? If they disrespect people's faith? If they insult White people on the streets?
Many Liberal groups are doing all of that without being called out: Antifas, BLM, EFF in South Africa, Black Hebrew Israelites, Red Brigades and so. This is scarcely talked about.
What do you think about it? #IsPoliticalViolenceOK #LiberalDoubleStandards Examples of Lib sponsored hatred:
Updates
+1 y
This is a honest question in response to this video:
It's not ok to punch anyone in the face for voicing different views then yourself, does not matter what political ideology you belong to.
If someone however tries to hurt/kill you, then you go ahead and try to hurt/kill them right back. Self defense is fine, but going out of your way to attack others for voicing different opinions is not ok at all. That's assault and suppression of free speech.
“The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans who are conservative. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems’ "The white conservatives aren't friends of the Negro either, but they at least don't try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox. One is the wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you.” - Malcom X
When you decide that it's okay to punch one group, it's not long until it's okay to punch other groups. We shouldn't be taking the advice of Antifa; remember that the first Antifa were in Germany, were a paramilitary wing of the German Communist Party, and drove the liberals of Germany in to the arms of the real Nazi's.
Punching actual Nazi's? That's what jury nullification is for; we'd applaud an actual Nazi getting his ass kicked. The problem is that, once you say it's okay, opponents will label anyone they want to punch a Nazi.
Look at the UK. Brexit makes them racist; because they don't want privileged immigration from a predominantly white EU. It's racist to treat white Europeans like brown Indians, and require that the whites prove they are beneficial to the country, just as Asians or Africans or South Americans must... What? Equality is racist!
I've said this before, and I'll say it again: White men should be judged by the content of their character, and not the color if their skin, just like everybody else.
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
I see that video is still up I figured it would have been banned for hate speech. You know because of all the Right leaning channels that have been deleted for hate speech for saying and doing far less.
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(25-29)
+1 y
Ever notice how about half of these "Kill All White Men" social media posts are ironically from leftist White Women themselves?
even so my friend, even so is what you meant to say.
This shit is fucked, I knew this agenda was being carried out, but I have been apart from social media for years and was not aware the extent to which it had progressed. This is so fucking overt!
No. Nazi is a label put on people who are racist white supremacists. They even carry Nazi symbols and chant Nazi slogans! So what is so inaccurate about calling them Nazis?
@TheSpartan : Then tell you what? That I studied a lot of history in college, and studied even more outside of college? That I speak German, which helps me understand European history more? You original question was do I know what a Nazi is. I certainly do understand what a Nazi is, and because I have studied them extensively, I recognize Nazi like behavior sooner than do most other people. Not because I'm so great, just that I've studied it so much.
@TheSpartan : You seem to miss the point, that saying someone is a Nazi can mean they profess many of the characteristics of Nazis, but aren't actually Nazis. However, designating them as Nazis, is a very accurate description of their philosophy and behavior. I only brought up the degree of my history studies, because you started your post saying 'Nazi is just a label liberal extremists put on people they disagree with...' That's plain garbage talk. I talk with many people who disagree with me, but I only refer to them an Nazis when they exhibit Nazi like sentiments or Nazi like actions. If the shoe fits, I call it by it's rightful name. Nazi. But I don't use that term loosely.
@TheSpartan : Are you serious? Here on posts? That Nationalsozialist Deutsche Arbeiterpartei philosophy could fill volumes of books. Everywhere from religion to Grossdeutschland, to Lebensraum, die Judenfrage, Slawen, and on and on.
@TheSpartan : There is not extensive review necessary, in most cases. If it looks like a duck, talks like a duck, sound like a duck, it most likely is a duck. And it's easy to tell a Nazi like person, if they are marching down the street, chanting the Nazi slogan "Blood and soil", and chanting "Jews will not replace us", as they did in Charlottesville.
To blame subsequent generations for past actions is akin to the following being accepted. You must agree that children of parents committing any crime requiring debt paid to the victims offspring.
The time of hardship for past black generations is over. They no longer have to work for free and have all the same legal rights. If anything, they have a few extra rights than the average citizen in certain places like university. Now they get to enjoy living in a place of prosperity.
But you sound like a social justice warrior without a brain capable of unbiased thought so think whatever you want.
Complain about the devil white people that created most of the world you see in front of you right now. Complain about them so much that you go live in the forest and play with your rocks and sticks because you're so much better than them.
Most Helpful Opinions