SJW activism is merely the radical wing of Neoliberalism, and intended to
get average people (scared by the SJW extremism) to agree to a large request (made by Neoliberals) by having them agree to a modest request first. People may not agree with looting, but how many of them dare to resist against the dispossession (the real Neoliberals' goal) of the average, Middle Class White citizen in Western countries?
Make no mistake. This is a kind of war against average White people. And as the book "Art of War" teaches, "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Supreme excellence consists of breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting."
You will not have any will to fight for your interests if you convince yourself that you are a "toxic man," a "privileged White person," if you think everything you have in your life was "granted to you by a society built on systemic racism." If you feel guilty and worthless, you will surrender instead of fighting. So all that phenomena of demoralisation and dispossession against Whites have become "normalised" because it faces no opposition, and people start to fear even giving the impression that they don't support that SJW causes enough because, as I said, this is the new "normal."
As another user said here, "If you control the language you can control the debate and eventually others."
Most Helpful Opinions
I think some of the stuff is extra, for sure. People create buzzwords to gain attention for the cause or concept they’re trying to advance. But even though it’s extra, a lot of it is based at its root in simply asking people to stop being assholes to other people, and I don’t understand why so many are so defensive of their “right” to have piss-poor attitudes.
They are real, they are in the worlds cultural lexicon. You just don’t agree with it, and that’s fine. Whilst they are highly annoying, and sometimes stupid as hell like cultural appropriation, they’re still real and valid.
To validate what they say I guess. I'll try to give an example "Reason for wage gap =Toxic masculinity" I'm sure of what I've just said 😂
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
17Opinion
Erm.. Lets take toxic masculinity. It was created in the 1980's by mens rights movements and has a pretty specific and useful meaning that is not covered by any other word and as such is also used in academic circles. What about white privilege? 1929 by a historian. Concept was also used in 1824. Basically if anything you are showing your lack of education here in believing these things are either new or "made up".
I find these as silly as you do :)
Each 'generation' sees certain words as sort of trendy and -emm- modern.
Many people will use them to appear smart or informed; or they keep their mouth shut because they have no clue, but can't admit it.
The words come - and most of them will go again. They are similar to fashion: soon forgotten, and replaced by other -new- nonsense.It helps conservatives argue with the surface of things if they are not expected to understand anything about the meaning behind the words. This triggers them into showing up to the discussion, which they otherwise would not, and nothing woild change.
It's a sign that you're living in pretty good times when people have to make up stuff to be oppressed by.
It's also a sign of how stupid your population is when they actually believe it enough to attack each other or die for it.same reason the right come up with words like ''social justice warrior''
What makes them not real? That you don't personally experience or agree with it? All evidence would say they're real. It doesn't actually matter if you believe it or not. All that matters is that it's proven. And it has been, time and time again.
None of these words are new, they've been around in articles, literature, and the media for decades. But oh, speaking of nonsense word creations - "SJW" is actually a good example. Or "PC culture".
Those phrases have been around awhile. You’re only hearing about them now bc our president keeps uniting more of enemies.
they're just trying to keep the short attention span of liberals with the use of new buzz words, while they work to keep dividing the people for whatever their ultimate agenda is. I agree it's annoying.
If you control the language you can control the debate and eventually others.
An SJW?
A Sweet Jewish Woman?
A Segregated Jesus Worshipper?
A South Jersey Wombat?Because it’s about trying to create enemies to fight.
SAVE US GEN Z!!! SAVE US FROM THIS INSANITY!!!
It's called university profs by the wayThere just words used when people feel like there voice isn't being heard.
“Newspeak”
If you control language you control thought.Buzzwords are a marketing strategy
Indoctrination isn't more than selling an ideologySome people feed off of outrage, they need it
Some people are still stuck in 2016 -_-
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions