
Does multiculturalism in a nation cause more harm than good?


I doubt there is significant support for the idea that multiculturalism on the aggregate level causes more harm than good. For example, crime rates among immigrants (and their descendants) here tend to be significantly higher. However, for the most part, 95-98% of them are not suspect of a crime, and crime tends to be overall rather minor.
I find it pretty damn hard to argue that 95-98% not being suspect of a crime and just participating in society does not outweigh the overrepresentation of those groups in the crime statistics anyway.
But even then, we are making the erroneous assumption that ethnicity and crime are inherently related, which is simply not the case. It'd be much more reasonable to take this in account given the socio-economic situation, considering that is a pretty solid predictor of crime statistics. In other words, as wealth among immigrants (and descendants) increases, it is highly likely that the crime rates will decrease. And we have seen a decrease in crime statistics over the year over the board.
Poverty rates are certainly higher among immigrants (and their descendants), but again, that is generally decreasing. And then the other argument is relevant; I'd argue that 95% of people living their life normally outweights a few percentage. Especially considering there is an inherent need for immigration in the country, since it does bring in greater labour force to sustain social security payments and alike over a timespan of the next century.
But perhaps problems ensue in the sphere of politics? Nope. Here in the Netherlands we have seen one party of exactly 3% of parliament more focused on immigrants. However, by far most of the non-western immigrants vote on the traditionally dominant labour parties here. Clearly, not a major shift in politics here nor infusion of radical ideas on a large scale. Perhaps language? This is literally just a matter of proper education.
The point is, yes, there are downsides to bringing in immigrants, even if they commit crime at a higher rate (though that is a simplistic conclusion). However, there are inherent benefits to bringing in more, such as economic value, increased competitiveness of a country, sourcing important jobs from abroad, increasing the workforce to sustain the social security system and alike. Hence, I doubt it is remotely reasonable to argue that multiculturalism on the aggregate level causes more harm than good. Unless someone is inherently against any mixing, but that's stupid
Yes… if the mix is right. (It's like cooking and/or baking. You need he right ingredients & proportions. Otherwise, ruin is inevitable… unless you're able to somehow identifying the destructive ingredients and neutralize them… or re-purpose them to work-out right.)
Back in the Philippines, we've had the Chinese trading and moving-in with us since the Ming dynasty onward, and they never gave us any serious problems. (The Chinese Communist Party 'dynasty' in the mainland, though…Yes, they've been problematic as of late, but I consider that small oligarchy separate from the masses Chinese people and this dynasty's problems are small compared to the centuries of benefit provided earlier. And the Chinese in Taiwan beyond the party's hold are again not a problem to us.) They gave us great food, useful vocabulary, practical ideas, etc.
The waves of well-monied Korean & American retirees (plus Korean students moving-in for a few years to learn English) are only benefiting us as far as I see. They spend in the country. And if they start businesses, they introduce goods & services we would never have enjoyed otherwise.
The Spaniards (who invaded us and ruled us for 300years) both created what we are now and also massively destroyed what we already had. But then again, we didn't really have control of that, likewise with invasions & administration of U. S. & Japanese forces. Just how much did the benefit/harm us? That is up to debate today.
As for Muslims… that becomes difficult. They also contribute to the nation… but make parallel societies that either try to impose on the rest of us or start wars to begin a new nation altogether separate from everyone else. Their culture is way too different, it seems, to be compatible.
No, it doesn't cause a problem if you're mature enough to accept and maybe even embrace your differences.
This is coming from someone who has grown up in a multicultural society and have lived among and become friends with people of different races, religions/non-religions, beliefs, sexualities, etc.
In fact, it makes me a less ignorant person because I'm not only aware of people like me, but I'm aware of different people too.
I'm a Muslim brown British Pakistani meat-eater.
Whereas my best friend who's like a sister to me, is an Atheist white British Hungarian vegan. Our differences didn't do us any harm.
And actually before she moved to this city, she lived in a place which wasn't multicultural at all and that's where she grew up. She moved to our city, a multicultural place and personally to her, she prefers it here with all different kinds of people than in her old town with mainly one kind of person.
If people fight about their differences, and then blame multiculturalism then they're immature in my eyes. The problem isn't the multiculturalism. The problem is the people not being able to accept someone different to them.
Most of us are NOT mature enough and some cultures are just way too different. Look how Europe was run over my refugees and the crimes/assaults that followed. Have to look at the reality.
@Marilynjuana Of course. Blame refugees for crime when in reality, it was only a small amount of refugees who committed crime compared to the large amounts who came.
Honestly, you do know that not all immigrants are refugees right? Refugees are only one part of the puzzle. You've also got your economic migrants who come here, work and contribute to economy.
The way you make it sound, Europe was a peaceful place before, and then these refugees came and started causing violence and crime.
Are we really going to pretend that crimes/assaults didn't exist in Europe before refugees came?
And why is you're only looking at the crimes/assaults committed by refugees? Why not look at all the good things many have done for Europe? Why don't you show me a credible source showing the impact of refugees on Europe so we can see the bad and good refugees have done for the European countries?
The problem is people with *your* mentality. You've probably seen a few headlines online, heard something from god knows who, and now your mind is made up about refugees and immigration. And you're most likely so ignorant, that you think refugees = all immigrants.
And there is so much more to multiculturalism than refugees.
Because I knew some refugee kids at my school, and they didn't cause crime or assault they just wanted to come to school and learn have fun, make friends like any other kid would.
I'm not saying all refugees are perfect and don't commit crime they do, but you are looking at it from a one-sided angle. When, you have to look at the reality.
Most of us ARE mature enough, and we can get along. It's ignorant people like you, preventing that.
I stopped reading at the first sentence. You are completely clueless so don’t talk about topics you have no idea of. Take a look into what really happened in Germany, England for example, Einstein. Jesus..
Life isn't a happy fairytale. Cultures are different, religions are different, social development is different. Take a look at the facts, actual incidents, and take your head out from the sand. Or simply keep quiet and don't talk about things you have no knowledge of. Let the people more mature make the decisions.
@Marilynjuana
Lmfao so you start of by creating an argument merely based on salient events with nothing proven on the aggregate level (which is just nonsensical and ridiculous) and then blame others for being clueless.
Here are some papers:
1. Lack of statistically significant connection between asylum seekers and local crime rate in the USA
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Bansak, C., & Pozo, S. (2018). Refugee Admissions and Public Safety: Are Refugee Settlement Areas More Prone to Crime? International Migration Review, 0197918320920192.
2. Asylum seekers have had a slightly statistically significant effect on crime that predominantly affects only other asylum seekers. They also have a statistically significant effect on local crime, but not in a way where it apparently causes a disturbance to local population
Gehrsitz, M., & Ungerer, M. (2017). Jobs, crime, and votes: A short-run evaluation of the refugee crisis in Germany.
And most common crime of asylum seekers in Germany, not paying on public transport. (https://m. dw. com/en/report-refugees-have-not-increased-crime-rate-in-germany/a-18848890)
And in the Netherlands? Asylum seekers were apparently less criminal than non-asylum seekers with the same socio-economic class, age and gender
Achbari, W., Leerkes, A. S., 2017, Van perceptie naar feit — Asielzoekers en buurtcriminaliteit WODC, Cahiers 2017-16
@tartaarsaus same answers to you. Toodles!
@Marilynjuana
Okay, so you make claims based on salient events and are completely resistant to facts.
Interesting.
I’d suggest you let more mature people make decisions while you keep quiet as you are clearly even unwilling to look beyond salient events and look at empirical analysis, which is stupid
@tartaarsaus I disagree and won’t bother spending my time on this. I have my views for a reason, you also could be mature and respect it.
PS! The events I talked about - be so kind and look more into it. I take you’re from the states and don’t quite know how taking in refugees goes for normal civilians. Toodles.
@Marilynjuana
So you want respect for your views while simultaneously do not respect other’s views? Interesting.
And, sure you have a reason, they are likely just not factual, given the evidence that suggest asylum seekers have no or small aggregate effect on e. g. crime.
But then again, you can indeed have fact-free opinions
Eh, how asylum seekers affect normal civilians is reflected in crime statistics.
If the crime statistics say they have no statistically significant effect while civilians believe it has, that’s merely a heuristic on the part of civilians and not an actual factual observation of them.
Interesting interesting, be the bigger person then. Here in Estonia there have been countless rapes, assaults and robberies which the country was literally chocked by. My good friend got her bra ripped and multiple hands into her pants at the gang rape at NYE celebration in Germany. Sorry to be blunt, but I won’t enable anything like that to happen again. And I don’t have much respect for opinions that speak of the matter while thinking the world only stop with the US. I don’t care if you respect mine, my point was, if it bothers you, don’t be a hypocrite. Interesting, interesting..🤪
Shocked*
Well I’m not even American lmao. And if you read, I did include papers that stated asylum seekers haven’t had a statistically significant effect in Europe except when it has effect on other asylum seekers or in ways where it does not affect the local populace in Europe.
Oh, and I’m not a hypocrite. The difference is that I care about actual statistics whereas you merely use salient events, which is not evidence.
We actually live that life here. That’s what I’m using. Leave it, mate, I truly don’t care. I am sure you know the answers to these matters in this world.
Yeah no, personal experience does not in any shape or form weigh up against empirical evidence
Of course, Einstein.
🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
So far I been living in a multicultural country, there's no such thing, maybe it work best with small population. But I noticed that political figures are more into divide and rule and does't want communities to stay together.
Opinion
18Opinion
100% it causes more harm. You can't bring in a different culture with different languages, God, customs and historic baggage and not expect division, not if you're being realistic and not ideological.
Then you have those who are clearly minorities but yet attack the majority as racist and hateful for simply having homelands of their own where they have built up prosperity for their people, even that has become a problem to those imported into the nation.
What have we gained exactly If you're not from the indigenous group you don't really have an opinion on this. Or it is irrelevant. Multiculturalism has failed horrible, we hold on to pathetic enrichment like we can buy curries now or something (like we couldn't before multiculturalism) it only works if you ignore the number of terrorist attacks, it works if you ignore the mass racist rape of white children numbered 20,000 per year (girls) at the hands of Pakistani grooming gangs. Now with the BLM hate mongers have really shown this will never be home to some, they will ignore the progress to reunite the hatred of the past. Multiculturalism has never worked, every nation standing together was built on different ideals than diversity being our strength lol
I dont object to multiculturalism. It can be a source of strength. But multiculturalism shouldn't be celebrated at the expense of assimilation. We all come from different places and from different cultures that have different customs. That is part of what makes America strong. We can be proud of these differences and celebrate them but not to a degree where people don't learn to speak English. English should be mandatory simply to tie us all together. If you want to speak another language that is fine but allowing communities to exist without making an attempt to fit in with the existing language and culture is a recipe for disaster.
There is no common sense anymore. Schools, teachers, politicians... They're acting like idiots
Giving politicians like Omar and AOC a huge platform all in the name of political correctness is also foolishness. The media becomes even more biased by giving these outliers a much bigger voice, all at the expense of every other American of every race and religion.
No. Multiculturalism is by it's nature only a transitory state between two dominant cultural states. Either the additional culture (s) gets assimilated and a new dominant culture forms, or the additional culture (s) are purged or form insular groups (e. g Chinatown) which may or may not alter the dominant culture. The only semblance of "multiculturalism" that is truly sustainable is small but consistent immigration -- varying proportionally to the likeness of the new culture to the dominant culture. Bringing Canadians into the US? No big deal, they're quite similar so you could let in quite a few before it made a splash. There's a lot of talk about Hong Kong right now, I think they share a lot of liberal values and would fit right into the liberty mindset of the US. But something like Saudi Arabia I think wouldn't have immigrants that would assimilate so easily so they should be much fewer than others more similar in culture to the US.
So basically multiculturalism is nonsense it just doesn't exist on a large scale, and to the extent that you see insular communities in the US which give it that multicultural appearance, they've been there a while and are essentially united under the idea of being American. New cultures coming would need to be ready to be American first.
There is a common saying these days "diversity is our strength". Many proponents of multiculturalism will tell you this. While there is merit to this argument, they are usually unaware that unity must come first in order for diversity to lead to strength. Diversity is a strength only after unity has been established.
Multiculturalism can be quite powerful if all of the cultures involved agree on the same basic values and goals as a society. Otherwise, yes, it's a recipe for disaster.
Absolutely 1000% correct. That’s why the US needs to ban muslims from entering. They don’t share our values. They believe in a false God. I’ve got no issues with Hispanic people tho cuz they tend to value the same things I do.
Ban the bad Muslims.
I know, but banning all of them seems a bit too harsh.
How can you say multiculturalism is bad but then also say banning all Muslims is too harsh? Just exactly what are you trying to advocate for then anyway ha ha @Hispanic-Cool-Guy
@jack9949 Couldn't you say the same thing about Christians though?
Some cultures are fundamentally incompatible with each other and mixing them together is just asking for trouble.
If you move to a country you should integrate with their culture. Can't expect everyone to accomodate cultural behaviours that are not acceptable just for fear of appearing racist. (Though to be fair if you're in the UK it seems you absolutely can...)
I mean, the issue for me isn’t so much the multiculturalism as much as it is that people can’t seem to stand people acting any differently than them, which I don’t get, because to me, Rule #1 of life is mind your own business. I just don’t understand why we all live in such fear and distrust and disdain of/for one another. It’s just sad.
When you Mia difference there’s gonna be more problems... don’t mean we can’t, shouldn’t, or won’t try though... this division of racism isn’t as prominent as the media would like you to believe.
It exists to be sure but everyone isn’t racist. This is people storing the pot and their the real problem. Not the difference in culture and racism.
If left alone racism will naturally die out but every time it’s close people bring it back up.
If there isn't some commonality of goal around which to assimilate, then you won't have an organized nation for long. You'll just have warring tribes, destroying everything. Happens to every continent on Earth that refuses to learn this lesson.
It is a challenge - but a very positive one.
Surely, there will be frictions here or there; but the benefits clearly outweigh those.
Trouble being, that the very simple people usually can't cope with the intellectual/mental challenge that comes with it.
Agreed. The best way to predict future behaviour is to take a look at the past. Guess what, shit like this never worked.
You mean the Roman Empire? That fell about by internal corruption or something.
First incident that came into my mind was Europe with refugees coming in.
Yes, it's been tried before, many times in history, and it's always failed.
It never worked. It brought soon or later only problems.
Cultures should be separated so they can develop better. Mixing deletes the other cultures or makes one that is weird
I think fighting multiculturalism causes more problems than multiculturalism itself. Look at China, who is hard at work repressing multiple cultures as we speak, and is thus all the more unstable because of it. Meanwhile in Canada, for instance, their embrace of multiple cultures has made them a viable destination for immigrants and thus economic growth
From my experience, unfortunately yes. But it'd be a lot better if people could learn to keep their shit to themselves and not brush off their own things on others.
Not a disaster. Imagine what American food would be without immigrants.. I think it’s only bad when one or more of them become a ruling class. In other words class system is what ruins a country.
America has a lot of racial problems and tensions right now. Haven't you noticed? Besides, America is the exception to the rule too.
Go jam one 10 million Sudan Africans, 10 million Arabs, all into Japan rightt now and see what happens?
It doesn’t just stop with ‘Murica either. A good friend of mine was sexually assaulted 2015-16 NYE in Germany when refugees ganged up on helpless women and abused them. Europe was completely run over by them because they simply don’t fit here but to them, Europe is the way to bloody paradise.
Racial problems in America are kind of dramatized I think. It’s only a minority of people making a mess and being on the news. The rest of the country is business as normal. of course if you “jam” 10 million of anyone anywhere it will be chaotic. That’s not a realistic depiction of immigration...
People have mixed and contacted with each other throughout human history. I mean I think it’s a pretty normal thing. Countries are ruined by class or party struggles not necessarily different cultures... maybe a different culture can cause ethnic tensions but that’s not enough to “ruin” a country. Because ruining a country requires more power politics than just ethnic tensions...
@Marilynjuana I think there’s a difference between multiculturalism and just letting crime happen...
Crime happened due to multiculturalism. No one “let it happen”. No one asked them to abuse our women and men. They don’t fit in. They’re too different. In their world it is okay to do that, not in first world countries.
@Marilynjuana ok well maybe those particular people are a problem but I think in general it’s ok. Like would you stop Polish people from moving to France just because they’re from a different culture? Like maybe there are some bad immigrants but I can’t imagine just cutting off every other possible culture...
@Marilynjuana I mean I see what you mean but I think there just needs to be a more stringent process so that immigrants naturalize instead of doing whatever they’re used to... I don’t know.
Based on what I know and what I have seen, I believe it is risky no matter what. Finnish people hate us, Estonians, who go to Finland to find better work. Us, Estonians, hate Russians who move to us and expect Estonia to be their new Russia. Racism itself is a big issue here too, due to the ancient mindsets of the older generations. I can’t talk about America because I’m not too involved with the issues there, but personally I don’t support mixing up people, cultures etc etc. Not to bash your opinion, I’m glad you have more hope than I do hahah.
Let's look at the increasingly small number of countries that don't have multiculturalism, so for example Japan. They have cultural and economic stagnation, ageing population and a falling birthrate. Suddenly multiculturalism doesn't look so bad.
Yeah and even a country like Japan IS multicultural but people seem to ignore that. For example there are even differences of culture between cities and stuff...
@joseluisgonalez: Your logic makes no sense. The Japanese should just have sex and reproduce. Its not rocket science..
Try telling that to the otaku.
I don't think so except when everyone learns one race used to kind of control another. Then everyone turns against that one race.
Hmm I don't know; this is a very interesting perspective. Why do you think it would cause problems?
I mentioned it above. Once you start to have a society where many people come from different religious backgrounds, social mannerism, languages, culture and an established political identity as its in their native land, then there's going to be a clash which can trigger suspicions, fear and distrust among the population.
Its inherit human nature to feel and want to be around people that look like you, share the same culture, language, religious beliefs and political beliefs as you or close to it. Total polor opposites in such cases brings about civil unrest in due time.
I disagree look at NYC there is not social unrest between all those cultures. That is silly thought.
Yes there is not many benefist i think it was done on purpose. Where many different cultures there will always be dissagrementa
You can also add your opinion below!