People (well, men, women are always gonna come out with this kind of bullshit) who don't think that it's their own responsibility to defend themselves are cowards.
haha. @goaded there were plenty, but these girls didn't have any. If have gun, shoot one in the head before the other 60 shoot you. As the movie "Planet of the Apes" said so well... "guns are power".
Americans suffer from an entitlement problem. Because Americans are raised with the idea that they should have the freedom to do anything, they have no concept of personal responsibility. They have the mindset "I have the right to be an irresponsible asshole because of freedom".
Only people who are ignorant of history would think that. The past has shown that when tyrannical governments or leaders have disarmed everyone they tend to commit genocide. The 2nd Ammendment was written just for that. We have tyrannical individuals in the senate and congress now that want to outlaw everything. Gun registration only leads to confiscation and genocide. The 2nd Ammendment also keeps other countries from invading.
No as a black man I can’t go anywhere without getting profiled and getting a bunch of false police reports by white people. I feel threatened, I carry guns because this is the life of a black man. They can kill you and get away with it. Black people 4 staying strapped
No not necessarily being honest owning anything to cause harm is for your protection. Fact is not everyone is built to cause harm to another but just because some people are they prey on the weak. So why not give them a way to protect themselves.
there's nothing wrong with being aware and being ready for anything life will throw at you, life isn't fair, there's people out there that would kill for a sandwich
No, and its a good decision, whether its for sport, hunting, home defense, or if you want to join a militia, not sure what the laws are like in SA but Id look into it
Have you ever actually fired a gun? It takes quite a bit of getting over fear to do so. Many of the people who say those with guns are cowards seem to start shaking in fear if they hear one fired or have to fire one themselves.
@KrakenAttackin all my friends do it to... and if they get their friends to do it we can really make a difference. At least locally. Apart from those two exceptions, guys who like guns have low confidence/need to compensate for something lol
@Alexandrubaschet08 Don't be such a white knight, Cuck. Why don't you just offer to bring her take out food why she fucks a guy wearing a MAGA hat. There is no honor on being an orbiting beta.
@Alexandrubaschet08 they’re idiots. Ignore them. As for dislikes. Trumpers are making fake accounts. If you look at likes under or Trump opinions, they often have xper lvl 1 accounts liking them that are often banned a couple days later.
Police would no longer be charged with murder and attempted murder. In the situation where you are a girl you are more careful. Be careful where you go, be careful what kind of people you interact with, be careful what time you go out. Even with a gun at hand as a girl, the psychopathic criminal shot you first without warning. If weapons were banned, such crazy criminals would be reduced.
Why would you even point those examples out if you don't even care about considering what they mean? It's not like disarming citizens is inherently totalitarist. Which is exactly why Germany didn't change much about that even after and so many countries adopted a similar approach to gun control. Japan can be a good example of that, even from before the WW
Disarming citizens is inherently... a totalitarist move... there's no argument about that, what's libertarian about the government coming into your home and taking weapons you want to defend yourself with?
The people must be armed so when government tyranny comes, people can rise up instead of accepting it lay down.
Actually, the Nazis laxed gun control laws that were present in Weimar Republic and people could own guns with a permit in the USSR. And the claim that being anti gun means you're pro tyranny argument leaves out a critical fact: lose gun control laws allows authoritarian factions to organize paramilitary units set on depriving others of freedom by locally or nationally forcing out the legal protections of the democratic government. Rebelling against the federal government doesn't necessarily mean that you're pro freedom and this is a fact that Americans should know all too well:
@Ad_Quid_Orator "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." - Karl Marx
The State is not your friend, people should have the right to arms.
Then it's easier for a rogue faction to take power in the first place and then you have private tyranny (even worse than state tyranny). This is also part of why proprietarianism (incorrectly referred to as "libertarianism" in the US) is actually a totalitarian ideology down to its' core. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgOa9UkCN-w&t=131s
A rogue faction would need significant support to overthrow the state, if the state is overthrown by such a party, then they must have pissed off a lot of people for it to come to that.
How is your case even a point for taking people's right to armament? It sounds like a statist's talking point to scaremonger the average person into giving up the way they can defend themselves against YOU.
"Significant" doesn't mean the majority (the Nazis were never elected into power and the Germans having greater access to firearms didn't stop them). And you're totalitarian ass is just looking for excuses to give private unaccountable organizations the means to obtain power and enforce over the rest of us.
Erm... Hitler won the majority of seats in the reichstag in the election just before the enabling act was put in by the reichstag. Nazi Germany is also a complicated issue. The choice was the KPD or the NSDAP and the people of Germany decided to choose the NSDAP. The reason for this extremism is a combination of the bitterness from losing WW1, Versailles and the Great Depression (funny, when people are out of work & homeless they'll listen to extremism)
You need to revaluate your point, I don't know at all why you support disarmament of the populace (your fears of some militia rising up and taking over the country are pretty strange, in the whole existence of the US no one has ever done it.) it seems you want disarmament just to further your own hidden agenda and use the State as your way of enforcing it. That's fucked up, man.
They won the plurality of the seats in the Reichstag, not the majority and Hitler was appointed to an executive position by Paul Von Hindenburg and after he died, Hitler obtained absolute power. But we aren't just talking about the US here.
@007kingifrit I believe @Ad_Quid_Oretor already made a splendid point of why that isn't the case (to which, I agree). I don't think having a loose gun control gives the populace the kind of "power" you seem to seek (the one to be able to literally fight off an unjust government). The historical events cited up to now can be a good example. I think the Italian fascism could be included as an example too
Just saying something is the way you say it is doesn't make it so. Could you try argumenting that? As said, I think history shows the opposite quite clearly, much like the state of current democracies do
@Vencam the greatest mistake of any generation is to think the current trend of things will always be the trend of things. the age of peace is almost over. the future belongs to the armed. bretton woods will fall in 10 years
and we seem to have hit a wall. you are just responding "Nuh uH" to my thesis
No, in fact I'd say the opposite, especially those people use it in defense of themselves, their family or their property. Something that can grant someone a lot of destructive potential can easily corrupt them if they aren't ready to receive it.
2
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
no the opposite. As an American man I will take responsibility to protect my family, friends, neighbors and business with a firearm. People who oppose guns are cowards who think that the police will save them so they dont have to fight.
Nope, why wouldn't you want a gun, most gun are just for fun and sport, so why not have a shotgun that you hang over your door, its fun, it really isn't for protection, that's just a plus.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
124Opinion
People (well, men, women are always gonna come out with this kind of bullshit) who don't think that it's their own responsibility to defend themselves are cowards.
no, history is filled with scenarios where if you don't have one, then you get butchered. might get butchered anyway, but at least can fight back.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/5Ywe5pFT928You're suggesting there weren't guns in Germany in 1945?
haha. @goaded there were plenty, but these girls didn't have any. If have gun, shoot one in the head before the other 60 shoot you.
As the movie "Planet of the Apes" said so well... "guns are power".
You think that "these girls" would have been effective against seasoned soldiers?
@goaded no.. still going to die. die fast without being gang raped and shoot leader maybe.
Americans suffer from an entitlement problem. Because Americans are raised with the idea that they should have the freedom to do anything, they have no concept of personal responsibility. They have the mindset "I have the right to be an irresponsible asshole because of freedom".
Only people who are ignorant of history would think that. The past has shown that when tyrannical governments or leaders have disarmed everyone they tend to commit genocide. The 2nd Ammendment was written just for that. We have tyrannical individuals in the senate and congress now that want to outlaw everything. Gun registration only leads to confiscation and genocide. The 2nd Ammendment also keeps other countries from invading.
No as a black man I can’t go anywhere without getting profiled and getting a bunch of false police reports by white people. I feel threatened, I carry guns because this is the life of a black man. They can kill you and get away with it. Black people 4 staying strapped
No not necessarily being honest owning anything to cause harm is for your protection. Fact is not everyone is built to cause harm to another but just because some people are they prey on the weak. So why not give them a way to protect themselves.
No man. If everyone else has a gun you ain't gonna bring your fists to a gun fight.
there's nothing wrong with being aware and being ready for anything life will throw at you, life isn't fair, there's people out there that would kill for a sandwich
No they are smart and wise everyone think just because Joe is in office everything is good we are still being led down the rabbit hole we will see so
I'm British and I live in South Africa. Am I a coward for wanting a gun?
It's not wanting a gun that makes someone a coward. It's being afraid all the time.
No, and its a good decision, whether its for sport, hunting, home defense, or if you want to join a militia, not sure what the laws are like in SA but Id look into it
It's not easy these days. Especially for an immigrant.
Are you an immigrant to South Africa? Do you have dual citizenship?
@DJB72 or rather do you still hold citizenship of your original country?
I'm English, 100%. Still a UK citizen but have resident status in SA
To them, they hide behind the 2nd Amendment. Right to bare arms. Okay fine, but those who have the "arms" think they are a "well regulated militia"
This isn't well regulated. They look like someone out of the Rock Auto Commercial
Have you ever actually fired a gun? It takes quite a bit of getting over fear to do so. Many of the people who say those with guns are cowards seem to start shaking in fear if they hear one fired or have to fire one themselves.
No. I live in a rural area and many people substitute their groceries for what they hunt and catch.
Yes. Guns are for losers who need a confidence boost.
Two exceptions:
1. Hunters with bolt action/shotguns. Those are legit.
2. Sport shooters who leave their guns at the range.
Anyone else is just a loser. I wouldn't date them.
Anon... OMG... you would withhold your magical pussy from gun owners! How will we all survive!! ,😂😂😂😂🖕🖕🖕🖕
@KrakenAttackin all my friends do it to... and if they get their friends to do it we can really make a difference. At least locally. Apart from those two exceptions, guys who like guns have low confidence/need to compensate for something lol
That’s alright... women who enjoy firearms will keep them company. 🙈🤪
@blmoore6108289942 you’re not a woman.
OP... Oh NO... so all of your bitchy feminist friends will also withhold their magical pussies? Will the human race survive?
Take your bad attitude, chronic resting bitch face, Alpha female pettiness. And go fuck some Soy Boy.
@KrakenAttackin lol
Damn cracked don’t even take her on a date first just eviscerate her on the spot.
I'm sorry for the large number of dislikes you have. It is very clear that your answer shows us how stupid Americans are.
Come say that to my face and we can see who’s stupid.
@VanillaSalt Yeah... that's how I roll.
@VanillaSalt get me a visa :)
@Alexandrubaschet08 Don't be such a white knight, Cuck. Why don't you just offer to bring her take out food why she fucks a guy wearing a MAGA hat. There is no honor on being an orbiting beta.
@KrakenAttackin what are you talking about?
@Alexandrubaschet08 they’re idiots. Ignore them. As for dislikes. Trumpers are making fake accounts. If you look at likes under or Trump opinions, they often have xper lvl 1 accounts liking them that are often banned a couple days later.
@blmoore6108289942 Happy to have you on board! I love seeing young women who open carry.
@ChefPapiChulo thanks dud. I apreciate your help.
@Alexandrubaschet08 Perhaps the two of you should go around collecting guns.
Anon... just another cunt who uses sex as a weapon.
@KrakenAttackin bro stfu
@KrakenAttackin you’re fucking annoying
@ChefPapiChulo You find me annoying? GOOD. You and your kind are the enemies of everything that built this country.
@KrakenAttackin get a life
MORE LIKE SMART. FOR THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING. A COP won't BE THERE IN SECONDS OF NEED. SPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A GIRL
Police would no longer be charged with murder and attempted murder. In the situation where you are a girl you are more careful. Be careful where you go, be careful what kind of people you interact with, be careful what time you go out. Even with a gun at hand as a girl, the psychopathic criminal shot you first without warning. If weapons were banned, such crazy criminals would be reduced.
@Alexandrubaschet08 If guns were made illegal, criminals wouldn't have guns because they would obey the law. Hahahahahahahahaha!
@Alexandrubaschet08 But criminals already don't follow laws. What makes you think they would follow gun laws?
No. Anyhow, owning a gun doesn't make a person brave OR cowardly. What they do with it and why determines that.
No, they're smart.
Nazi Germany disarmed their citizens.
USSR disarmed their citizens.
The people must be armed and ready to crush government tyranny, or in this day and age, tyranny from transnational corporate interests.
Why would you even point those examples out if you don't even care about considering what they mean?
It's not like disarming citizens is inherently totalitarist. Which is exactly why Germany didn't change much about that even after and so many countries adopted a similar approach to gun control.
Japan can be a good example of that, even from before the WW
Disarming citizens is inherently... a totalitarist move... there's no argument about that, what's libertarian about the government coming into your home and taking weapons you want to defend yourself with?
The people must be armed so when government tyranny comes, people can rise up instead of accepting it lay down.
Actually, the Nazis laxed gun control laws that were present in Weimar Republic and people could own guns with a permit in the USSR. And the claim that being anti gun means you're pro tyranny argument leaves out a critical fact: lose gun control laws allows authoritarian factions to organize paramilitary units set on depriving others of freedom by locally or nationally forcing out the legal protections of the democratic government. Rebelling against the federal government doesn't necessarily mean that you're pro freedom and this is a fact that Americans should know all too well:
@Ad_Quid_Orator "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." - Karl Marx
The State is not your friend, people should have the right to arms.
Then it's easier for a rogue faction to take power in the first place and then you have private tyranny (even worse than state tyranny). This is also part of why proprietarianism (incorrectly referred to as "libertarianism" in the US) is actually a totalitarian ideology down to its' core.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgOa9UkCN-w&t=131s
A rogue faction would need significant support to overthrow the state, if the state is overthrown by such a party, then they must have pissed off a lot of people for it to come to that.
How is your case even a point for taking people's right to armament? It sounds like a statist's talking point to scaremonger the average person into giving up the way they can defend themselves against YOU.
"Significant" doesn't mean the majority (the Nazis were never elected into power and the Germans having greater access to firearms didn't stop them). And you're totalitarian ass is just looking for excuses to give private unaccountable organizations the means to obtain power and enforce over the rest of us.
Erm... Hitler won the majority of seats in the reichstag in the election just before the enabling act was put in by the reichstag. Nazi Germany is also a complicated issue. The choice was the KPD or the NSDAP and the people of Germany decided to choose the NSDAP. The reason for this extremism is a combination of the bitterness from losing WW1, Versailles and the Great Depression (funny, when people are out of work & homeless they'll listen to extremism)
You need to revaluate your point, I don't know at all why you support disarmament of the populace (your fears of some militia rising up and taking over the country are pretty strange, in the whole existence of the US no one has ever done it.) it seems you want disarmament just to further your own hidden agenda and use the State as your way of enforcing it. That's fucked up, man.
Armed rogue factions have a better track record of depriving freedom than an armed population has of restoring it.
They won the plurality of the seats in the Reichstag, not the majority and Hitler was appointed to an executive position by Paul Von Hindenburg and after he died, Hitler obtained absolute power. But we aren't just talking about the US here.
@Vencam yes diarming citizens is inherently totalitarian. it will result in dictatorship everywhere
its only a matter of time
@007kingifrit I believe @Ad_Quid_Oretor already made a splendid point of why that isn't the case (to which, I agree).
I don't think having a loose gun control gives the populace the kind of "power" you seem to seek (the one to be able to literally fight off an unjust government). The historical events cited up to now can be a good example. I think the Italian fascism could be included as an example too
@Vencam its not a point he countered and it cannot be countered. an unarmed public will end up under a tyrannical government, every time
Just saying something is the way you say it is doesn't make it so. Could you try argumenting that?
As said, I think history shows the opposite quite clearly, much like the state of current democracies do
@007kingifrit
@Vencam the greatest mistake of any generation is to think the current trend of things will always be the trend of things. the age of peace is almost over. the future belongs to the armed. bretton woods will fall in 10 years
and we seem to have hit a wall. you are just responding "Nuh uH" to my thesis
No, in fact I'd say the opposite, especially those people use it in defense of themselves, their family or their property. Something that can grant someone a lot of destructive potential can easily corrupt them if they aren't ready to receive it.
no the opposite. As an American man I will take responsibility to protect my family, friends, neighbors and business with a firearm. People who oppose guns are cowards who think that the police will save them so they dont have to fight.
Nope, why wouldn't you want a gun, most gun are just for fun and sport, so why not have a shotgun that you hang over your door, its fun, it really isn't for protection, that's just a plus.