Why are we turning breast-feeding into chest feeding?

[Stoner710]

people wonder why I've been focusing on the trans issue this week its because of articles like this trying to turn the breast-feeding into chest feeding
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/breastfeeding-is-now-chestfeeding-brightons-trans-friendly-midwives-are-told-pwlvmcnc7

please read this this shit is insane why do you guys support this,

seriously if it was an issue of you just wanted to dress up as a women and go out in public fine and be called Stacy or something fine do that idc do what you want. but really does the trans movement have to go this far? this shit is stupid this is why people are against the trans movement

[psychoticanimaIIover]

How does this affect you in the slightest?

Follow up question - now that we’ve established that it DOES NOT affect you in the slightest, why the fuck are you trying to cause drama over it?

If you love the excitement, go on a roller coaster or something.

[Stoner710]

First off every thing is close there no roller coaster to go on.

2nd it affects me because I live in Washington state and if I don’t start using this stupid as language I get called racist homophobic trans phobic all the phobic. What doesn’t affect me is if they want to dress up as a women and be called Stacy what affects me is by change the very language we use, And it’s a rejection of reality, because you know and I know only women can breast feed

[normalice]

I don't think this is a thing in the U. S. but I also don't get why this upsets people so much. I bet if you just stopped thinking of it you would find the topic doesn't affect your life in any way at all. I guess some people have to obsess over fake outrage because they feel guilty about having no real problems of their own? I don't know what the deal is..

[Stoner710]

1 were in lock down still we dont have anything better to do
2 they are literally changing language to be something stupid in order to Appease a very small minority of people like less then.005% of the population and then say were bigots when we dont expert it.

[normalice]

Has your language actually changed? No? Then wtf are you talking about?

[Stoner710]

We’re talking about the logical consultation on what this article want to do they want to chance language it’s really that simple

[normalice]

You can simply refuse and "play" dumb if you hear someone else try to use it. I guarantee nothing will change.

[Stoner710]

Sure we can be Mick Romney and okay dumb and ignore it or we can be true conservatives and fight back against this crap I’d rather not be Mick Romney

[normalice]

You yourself admitted it's like.005% of the population. The odds of you being personally involved seem low. Unless you want a chick with a dick or something, I don't get why you're so obsessed with this issue.

[Stoner710]

It’s.005% of the population but 50% of the population mainly on your side of politics it wouldn’t matter if this was a fringe thing but it’s a mainstream issue unfortunately

[normalice]

You aren't making any sense. If its 0.005% of the population, the chances of it coming up in your real life are pretty small. Ergo, I don't see what the problem is. It doesn't matter what I think about it if the topic never comes up. And the only reason it keeps coming up is because you keep bringing it up. You are being paranoid obsessing about a thing you could live ten lifetimes and never see, letting it guide the rest of your political decisions away from sensible things like taxing the rich to pay for all the debt money that's been given to them.

[Stoner710]

Yea you don’t live near seattle man I see this crap all the time, So it has affected me I’ve never seen a tranny outside seattle and Portland, not even in L. A seattle you seem them every couple blocks. And if you call them by there real pronouns or don’t by into this kind of stuff they want to fight I’m sure if you don’t call breast feeding chest feeding in seattle now people are going to want to kill you, What state do you live in? Maybe it not as nuts as Washington and Oregon

[normalice]

How about you go ahead and let me know when you get death threats for calling it breast feeding.

[Stoner710]

Alright I’ll let you know probably going to happen in the next few days knowing this city

[normalice]

Cool.

I'd bet if you stopped listening to Shapiro you'd enjoy the city more, though. He's a worthless idiot but he has mastered the art of sounding like a seasoned intellectual. He needs your fake outrage or you might stop listening to him.

[Stoner710]

Actually a lot of people listening to the dailywire are disappointed with Ben right now because he wasn’t saying Trump won the election. Not enough to stop listening to him, Also given that I lived a little south of seattle and went up there every weekend growing up I’m pretty familiar with the city. It was beautiful but now we got Obamavills popping up everywhere needles on the grown and human poop it’s become a terrible city to live in, same with Portland

[normalice]

The dailywire is far right misinformation, so it's weird they would shun anyone who helps republicans win re-election. I guess it's cool to hear some sort of principle, even if it's an inverted one.

Also everyone I know that's been to Seattle recently seems to think the town is doing just fine. If you want to see a trash city visit a red state city, like St. Louis.

[Stoner710]

Actually dailywire is moderate (except for maybe Michael Knowles but he’s Catholic) same with Dave Rubin, Candice Owens Dennis Prager Steven crowder, Dave Rubin is actually a liberal and gay and voted for trump because Democrats have embraced socialism. This is why it pisses me off that people are saying if you voted for Trump you support the riots 2 things can be true at once you can disagree with what happened at the capital on Jan 6 and still have voted for trump, I don’t want to live under socialism no thank you, We live in a binary political system if the libertarian party had any chance of winning I would have voted for Jo Jorgensen but that it’s pretty much though isn’t away your vote or not voting at all.

If you want far right try Alex Jones or Nick Fuentes or Breitbart news after the death and Andrew Breitbart or the proud boys those guys are far right and there nuts Ben Shapiro is moderate like he support gays having the right to get married under the law and he would support legalization of marijuana he’s not going to actively campaign for it but he’s not against it.

[normalice]

No, its pretty much as far right as it gets. But then its hard to be right wing these days without being far right: it's the nature of scams that a "half scam" doesn't really make any sense. Not sure who the fake liberals you mentioned are, but they are obviously meant to be animated straw men so the far right people can defeat them easily in scripted arguments. Like the role Holmes used to have on Hannity, but a whole industry made out of it.

And the vote for (or against) trump was before the insurrection. It's more acknowledging that the insurrection was the worst possible thing to happen in this country and thus confirming it was a mistake to vote for trump - since you can say you didn't believe all the warnings you were given about trump had merit but now that you've seen they more accurately predict reality than the far right fake news that assured you there was nothing to worry about, you are parting ways with the far right fake news and loyalty to trump. If you don't do that then you are saying there are (likely fake) things you worry about more than an insurrection. That's what people will assume of you and if it pisses you off, I don't know what to tell you. Maybe stop being that way.

[Stoner710]

except im not going to support a party the believe in abortion up to 9 months (or any months to be honest) a party that believes men can be women a party who wants to tax the crap out of me, nor am i going to support a party that has embraced socialism. nor trying to quash free speech or think falsely there is systemic racism there are no laws on the books that discriminate against people by race. of you want to say history has consequences that yes i can agree with that but not the systemic racism like democrats claim.

if i could support the libertarian party i would but we dont live in a multi party system (3 or more) we are a binary system which means you have to be democrats or republicans. you either support socialism abortion up to 9 months and all the other stuff i mentioned or your not a democratic that was made clear when Pete Buttigieg Pete Buttigieg said there is no room for pro lifers in the democratic party.

we all really need to accept the fact that both side are completely different from the other side, this is why glenn beck said we're trending to succession, the left is the rights view is far left and the right in the left's view is far right. if that is the case what is the point of continuing as a nation?

whats your argument why shouldn't the United States break apart

[normalice]

And if I told you the democrats believe none of that - the far right fake news just told you they believe that - you'd still stick with the insurrectionist. So you are one of them.

As far as why the us shouldn't peacefully break apart the answer is simple: probably 60% of the population would need to be relocated in the process, but approximately 0% are at all interested in it being them. And as far as violently breaking apart, I'm saying that's what you're backing of an insurrection means, which I'm against.

[Stoner710]

if democrats dont believe and its the Fringes of your party fringes of your party then you need to get rid of them, reject bernie sanders and AOC robin d'Angelo Linda Sarsour and nicole hanna jones, thats what we see happening in your party.

also im more for the peaceful divorce where we just agree to go out separate ways of course people will have to move but fuck it thats a price im sure most america would be willing to make. then number isn't 0 its a good 10% and slowly gaining popularity because of joe biden executive orders you impeaching Trump for no reason and you kicking republicans off of senate committees, when republicans take back the house guess who on our chopping block

[normalice]

First of all, bernie isn't a democrat. He's an independent specifically because he doesn't agree with much of the democratic party. It just happens that democrats do occasionally practice accountability, unlike republicans, so he often runs with them and votes woth them.

Second, none of those are my representative so I have nothing like correspondence with them to explain their voting records (and neither, of course, do you - though for some obvious reason that only registers as important to one of us).

Third, I know you aren't going to consider the possibility that your far right fan fiction news lied about the motives and alignments of the people you listed, but it's certian that they did - they have no other way of hooking you in, after all, but to lie to you.

And you say trump was impeached for no reason yet claim to be against insurrection. I'm not even going to ask how you reconcile the two. You are for insurrection. You are for political revenge as a response to bringing up legitimate criticism. Your side is a bunch of insecure and derranged traitors and you wouldn't have it any other way. Also, "kicking republicans off Senate committees" is what happens when democrats took the majority. Bet your far right fantasy news didn't get you mad about it when republicans "kicked democrats of committees" when they took the senate in 2010. They probably didn't even bring it up, did they.

[Stoner710]

Ok so who is the mainstream of your party? The only one I know I could agree with is tulsi Gabbard, But everyone democrats seems to hate her,

Ok so these are the one the right thinks are radicals
Bernie Sanders if he’s not a democrats why was he running for the democrats party. If it because we have 2 parties and it’s either or? Prove my earlier point about either you vote for Biden or Trump
Ilhan Omar
Rashida Talib
Ayana Presley
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
Kristen Gillibrand
Ted Wheeler
Kshama Sawant (Leader of seattle city council she as openly admitted she a socialist)
Elizabeth Warren
Louis Farrakhan actual anti-Semite
Al Sharpton and other anti-Semite
Kamala Harris
Jay enslee (governor my state Washington )
Gavin Newsom

People we would actually consider moderate are people like
Tulsi Gabbard
my senators Patty Marie and Maria Cantwell (knowing my state they will be loosing there jobs to Kshama Sawant)
Joe mansion (he’s the dam right now holding back the leftist waters of Bernie Sanders.

by the way the news I listain to isn’t fake news, It is bias yes but it’s not fake.

[Stoner710]

Again I don't know what state your in but the democrats from the Midwest are way different than the coast, Think of a guy like John tester (Democrats from Montana). That guy is a true moderate he’s like tulsi Gabbard he his way different then the coastal democrats who are trying to fallow Bernie Sanders policies to a T and also try to Pursue Ibram X Kennedys anti-racist policies which are in fact racist or The idea of Robyn D’Angelo‘s white fragility, Again a racist book someone like tulsi Gabbard or John tester would disagree with these policies Washington Oregon California New York Illinois New Jersey’s Vermont they agree with Bernie. Maybe it’s just 5-7 states that push the racial policies of Bernie Sanders but there the states who have huge influence. But Washington New York and California are the loudest so they’ve been getting a lot of attention which is where people like me come in and try to make people understand why there policies are stupid. There no room for moderate in these states when it comes to government

[normalice]

That's the whole trick: there is no mainstream for democrats. We have AOC but we also have Tulsi Gabbard because we basically try to represent everyone the republicans leave out (which is everyone but the mega rich and conspiracy/political fantasy theorists). This is why Bernie runs as a democrat despite mostly loathing them.

Also, that you believe the caricatures of anyone you just mentioned are correct says that your news source is, absolutely fake and far right.

[Stoner710]

Ok so that would actually make it easier braking up the country give Illinois to Canada maybe a few of the New England states like New York Massachusetts New Hampshire Maine, As well as Washington Oregon and Florida, It these states that will cause a revolution and it these state that make your party look like communist, I know seattle city council has a bunch of communist on them like Kshama Sawant she the one who doxed Jenner Durken got Carmen best fired (first black women police chief) these states are cancer for your party and cancer for the nation the main issue state are the entire west coast, Illinois Massachusetts Vermont and New York Vermont is less of an issue because it’s so small. Also the only one who speak out in that state is Bernie Sanders.

Also if Bernie Sanders is not a real Democrat why even allow him to run in your party that makes no sense

[normalice]

Democrats have a big tent and try to represent everyone in it by ensuring a functional democracy. I suppose they figure as long as the people have equal power to participate in government, they are represented. Republicans don't want a representative government, as they prefer the mudsill theory. Obviously, the prior is more amenable to whatever Bernie stands for.

But anyway, sweeping declarations like "give Illinois to Canada" neglects to consider the ~2.3 million trump trash in the state. Are you going to pay for them to relocate? To where? You going to volunteer some of your space? No? Just going to let government solve the problem for you, eh?

[Stoner710]

Considering I would give my state to Canada I would have to move to, I’d probably go to Montana or Alaska, The 2-3 million republicans in Illinois would have to move like I would. (You forgot id give Washington state to Canada as well)

Also democrats would never except me in there party, especially since i plan to run for office, I’m pro life I’m for the death death penalty, I’m against the trans movement, Being pro life alone would disqualify me from being a Democrat

[normalice]

Thats odd of you to assume you speak for 2 million other people just because they are also far right conservatives. Isn't the whole thing among conservatives is they are mad about being pigeonholed as things just because other conservatives are those things? Like with racism?

Also, the thing democrats allow in their party is "not a republican." I know pleanty of pro life, pro death penalty, anti trans democrats. As long as you aren't strictly about tax cuts for the rich, appointing union busting judges, and restricting voter access to those who are more likely to vote for you, you qualify as a democrat.

[Stoner710]

Yea those aren’t the Democrats in my state, Washington state has become pretty much a Marxist state, we’re now going to be teaching transgender ideology to fourth graders. So the Democrats your talking about aren’t in Washington state, your either the AOC type Democrat or your republicans there really not much in between in this state,

Also remember Pete Buttigieg saying you can’t be pro life and be a democrat.

Also Union I have mixed feeling about private sector I understand, you have the right to strike and negotiate against your boss, Public sector unions I think we should get rid of like the teachers union the police union, there really isn’t a point in having them, There not legally allowed to strike, there not negotiating against your boss your negotiating against the American tax payers. If they want a raise or better buses or smaller classroom they should have to put it on the ballot, not go to the city of seattle and demand 100,000 dollar starting salary. (They did that in 2018 in seattle)

As far as voter access, I don’t think we should do mail in ballots universally I get it if you’re in a wheelchair or have some sort of physical issues that you need an absentee ballot but I think we should limit mail in balloting to those conditions of course if you’re overseas as well I voted for Obama in 2012 when I was in Japan., I think we should have voter I. D laws all you need is a state driver license or I. D and your good otherwise how are we going to know how if your legally allowed to vote you could be an illegal Russian immigrant and we would never know without voter ID law. Now I would support turning Election Day into a National Holliday so that everyone can go out and vote I’d be for it as a matter of fact make it a two day holiday make it Monday and Tuesday American shuts down and everyone goes and votes. Is that unreasonable?

[normalice]

Pete buttigeg couldn't even win Iowa.

And if you're trying to make it harder to vote instead of easier, regardless of the excuse, then I suppose you couldn't qualify as a democrat after all. The voter ID thing is nonsense, of course, as you can't register to vote if you are here illegally. And you don't get a ballot if you aren't registered. All it does is create an extra cost to those too poor to have an ID, which tend to be those who vote Democrat since republicans represent only the rich and those with enough money to be able to afford their naivete about who is to blame.

[Stoner710]

Illegal immigrants can actually vote on the West Coast, we know California will just vote blue anyway so they don’t really pay attention. Pete Buttigieg if he ran for governor in Washington he could probably win nobody likes Jay enslee. Also it’s a simple form f I. D you need a driver license or state ID just to walk down the street, it’s actually illegal not to have some form of I. D with you, I’m not saying you need a S. S card or birth certificate, just a simple driver’s license or state I. D will do. They check it just like they would check your hi Dee just like the one when you go and buy beer or cigarettes or weed. Quick glance, it’s as much as of a burden as it is getting your I. D for you to buy beer. Not 2 form of I. S just one.

What also funny is there more rich people in the Democrats party then republicans, Jeff Bezos Bill Gates Oprah about 90% of Hollywood is Democrat probably about 99% to be honest. We have a few rich people on our side. Now if I was in charge of tax law I would implement a flat tax or get rid of the income tax entirely and just have a sales tax but that actually benefits everyone instead of a group of people. This is in the republican party of the 1990s or the early 2000s ( which is why I think we need to get rid of people like Romney.). The tea party took over the republicans party.

[normalice]

No they can't. They can fill out a provisional ballot but it'll just get rejected.

It's not illegal not to have ID while walking around.

Bezos only pretends to be a democrat to throw everyone off. His business practices are anti union anti tax and very far right. Repiblicans definitely have all the rich people.

[Stoner710]

Actually it is illegal to walk around without ID that might be a state by state law. Homeless people have I. D it’s not hard to get. Other wise how are you going to make sure 17 year old or 16 year don’t vote or felons or illegal immigrants, California just check to see if your not caring a weapon beyond that you can go in a vote. But it’s California so no one pays attention. It votes blue Texas votes red so no one checks

[normalice]

It's not illegal in Iowa. And you can register with a social security number in some states. The simple fact is requiring ID without offering to pay for it is no different than a poll tax, which is unconstitutional.

[Stoner710]

Fine we’ll pay for it, we’ll even pay for your birth certificate and Social Security number to get to your house, that seems better than not having ID to vote because at least with that method we can check if you’re an American citizen or non-versus the way California is doing it where there just allowing everyone to vote, you don’t have to register you don’t have to show ID all you do is show up. California really is the biggest issue here,

of course I’d be all for just kicking California the union (99% joking). Just get rid of L. A (again joking) but still screw California. Try going to from Iowa to Washington state Oregon or California you’ll find the liberals way different. You’ll find the AOC‘s of the party here we mostly went for Bernie Sanders here Iowa Democrats are almost a different species of Democrat compared to the west coast

[normalice]

Excellent. Get your far right side to put some energy into paying for it First, and THEN you are fully justified in requiring ID. This nonsense of causing the problem while promising a solution you people have no intention of actually delivering on is like a "fool me once" thing, but where up to like a million.

Also that's not actually what is happening in California. By all means give it a shot if you think you can do it. Everyone who has tried because the far right fake news convinced them it was easy ended up serving 20 years. Do it. Then we can all talk about how we don't want to pay for your continued drain on our prison system and it would be cheaper to just kill you 😊

[Stoner710]

Ok the execution isn’t for people who committed voter fraud execution is meant for first-degree murder.

by the way they sent Ben Shapiro a ballot as he was moving to Florida (he sent it back saying his way moving and voted in Florida). Gina Carano in her interview with Ben Shapiro talked about her first time going to vote in advance of her that they weren’t even requiring ID. If they don’t require it for her who knows if an illegal immigrants voted when there not suppose to. Government probably shouldn’t be paying for your drivers license but they were just talking state ID fine go ahead and let government pay for that as long as we’re not having illegal immigrants vote and people who shouldn’t be voting vote like 16 year old (which there pushing for right now)

Can we at least agree that 16 year old shouldn’t vote, personally I think of you are not allowed to smoke or drink you shouldn’t be allowed to join the military or vote both of those decisions are more important then whether or not you’re going to have a beer or a cigarette. I’ve been an I have a cure for getting the drinking age and smoking age down to 18 but that’s hard to do because of the constitution and the 21st amendment.

[normalice]

Well, he says they sent him a ballot, but you can't have any qualms about lying to win a point if you're part of the far right fake news, as Shapiro is. And anyway, sending him a ballot isn't the same as collecting one from him.

Whether I agree that 16 year olds should vote isn't relevant, because they don't.

[Stoner710]

No but there pushing a bill right now basically Nationalizing (which I can guarantee you states like Texas and Florida are not going to go along with). But there trying to get 16 year old to vote,

So all news of fake news at this point, because you can’t trust CNN you can’t trust MSNBC you can’t trust fox according to you you can’t trust daily wire, hypo I can’t trust CBS you can’t trust the New York Times you cannot trust the Washington post in our trust in the LA Times she cannot trust the Seattle Times so what are we supposed to trust here when it comes to news? If all news both right and left is fake new then we’re really in trouble as a country

[normalice]

Who is "they?" Lowering the voting age to 16 is definitely not in H. R. 1

And you can sort of trust MSNBC and such. The whole reason the right created fake news is so they could create exactly the "both sides" question you are describing. Bit the fact is when the right is fake it is because they started with a narrative they wanted to push and then looked for facts that give the appearance of supporting it. When the left is fake it's because they have facts to present but they are boring and in order to compete with the entertainment value of the pure-fantasy right wing news they have to sensationalize. If you're comfortable with bland facts AP is the way to go.

[Stoner710]

Yea HR1 would pretty much allow 16 year olds to vote, it doesn’t mandate it but it provides incentives for people to cheat at elections.

MSNBC is bias to the left, but at least they admit it, I watch fox occasionally but 85% of my new comes from the dailywire or NPR. Philosophically Dennis Prager is pretty interesting. (I will see if I ever need a good pick up for the day I go over and watch Rachel Maddow‘s reaction to trump winning that was hilarious). If Democrats kicked the progressive out of there party I might be on board with some of there policies. Unfortunately it doesn’t seem like they’re ready to kick them out yet. Most liberals don’t like them anyway. I will say I do like 4 Democrats one isn’t in office right now Tulsi Gabbard. Right now the progressive in New York are saying if you vote for Andrew yang in New York your a racist because he did Ben Shapiro’s Sunday special. It’s really stupid

[normalice]

It wouldn't allow 16 year olds to vote. I have no idea what fantasy driver far rigt fake news source came up with that weird shit, but it's simply not rooted in reality.

MSNBC has a fact bias and tends to turn anyone who gets caught lying. It isn't their fault it's mostly republicans who get caught,

[Stoner710]

Really then why is joy Reid going on MSNBC and claiming that all white people are racist? Basically what you were saying is I should not trust any news source any research unless I do it myself.

[normalice]

Is Joy Reid a news anchor or just someone who went there to express their opinion? I don't actually know because I never heard of her, but I'm betting it was just an opinion. Opinions are not "news." And unlike the far right fake news, MSNBC sometimes goes out of its way to remind the audience of the fact that their opinions should not be taken as fact.

In any case, assuming that this Joy Reid person did express this opinion and it's not just more out of context nonsense b. s. from the far right fake news, the simple fact is the whole point of progressivism is to not have one person speaking for everyone. It is a collection of diverse opinions. That doesn't mean people can't just be informed how they are wrong and asked to move on, of course. But the idea of one person speaking for everyone is mudsill b. s. which is a far rigt thing.

[Stoner710]

Joy Reid basically does the same thing as don lemon or Chris Cuomo they all act like there are objective journalists but there really bias to the left. It would be like listening to Ben Shapiro thinking he’s not an option journalist. The difference is Ben admits he’s an option journalist, The reporters and MSNBC don’t. People like Rachel Maddow is essentially The Sean Hannity or Tucker Carlson is on the left.

[normalice]

Ah, you mean investigative journalist. That's someone who finds the facts and then comes up with the story they tell to explain them. Ben Shapiro, Sean Hannity, or Tucker Carlson come up with the story first and then find (or fabricate if needed) the facts to make it seem like non fiction.

It is a lot like the "cis woman" thing. I find the term slightly irritating because it suggests that normal women are the ones who need a qualifier. But the only reason that's the case is because all these fake women want a slice of a pie they don't really have any claim to. Reminder before you get too excited that this is only slightly irritating: it is up to actual women to decide whether or not tjey are irritatemd by it. But anyway, so too do we let the fantasy narrative journalists of the right get away with calling themselves "the right," instead of just scammers, thus necessitating that normal fact based journalists call themselves the left. For all the hypothetical oppression they get you mad about, I can assure you they don't go through any of it. But they do get gobs of money from the advertisers - and you are their purchase.

[Stoner710]

It’s not it’s not a scam it’s a different opinion Don lemon joy Reid and Chris Cuomo are not investigative journalist or opinion journalist there’s a difference. Same with Rachel Maddow. We don’t have true investigative journalist anymore like tell me why are they not asking Joe Biden any hard questions?

[normalice]

It's a scam because it is an opinion they definitely known is wrong but say it anyway because it is emotionally potent thus making it easier to exchange for money and power.

We're not asking Joe Biden hard questions because he isn't doing press conferences. We didn't elect him because he was a gifted orator. We nominated him as a compromise candidate because we didn't want you redcap mudsills to try to start a civil war if trump lost to someone like Bernie Sanders. Of course you did that anyway but who knows maybe the number of y'all that would have shown up if it was Bernie would have been enough to actually get the job done.

But also there aren't many hard questions to ask. The right's version of hard questions usually have a fictional premise, as does everything else on the right, but when we're going through like ten crises at once because the prior administration seemed to actively cause problems just to make his base laugh, there's not anything hard about "do you plan to fix it?" And anything that isn't that question is kind of silly to be asking.

[OddBeMe]

Well first off the Times could be overselling a story which it does often. But second, how many times a year do you say the word breastfeeding? Disregarding your porn searches...

[Stoner710]

Probably about 15 times a year

[OddBeMe]

So not a huge problem for you.

[Stoner710]

If we’re looking at day to day life no, if we’re looking at them trying to change definition and call people transphobic because we don’t want to use there definition then yes it is a problem, Go to seattle now and use the word breast feeding guarantee you will trigger somebody to get all up in your face and start calling you a racist sexist transphobic homophobe for using the word breast feeding and you’ll know what I’m talking about, I was in seattle visiting my nephew and great nephews (I’m adopted my nephew is more my age then siblings my sibling are old enough to be my mom and dad). Anyway his girl was breast feeding in the park and we got yelled at for being transphobic because trans women can’t breast feed and they called us sexist because my nephew wasn’t feeding the kid and then they called me racist for hanging out with my black nephews and his half korea half white girlfriend. This is the kinda of stuff I deal when I’m in seattle hence why I live on the eastern part of the state.

[joeldalton]

We aren’t. Twitter nonsense isn’t real life.

[Stoner710]

Unfortunately this isn’t Twitter this is a major publication in England

[Anonymous]

It's anti women. 😔