What's up with the democrats sending 75 lawyers to try and stop the Arizona audit, got something to hide?

[The_Sal]

is the election was clean af no feaud then yo u should be cheering this audit on to boast your victory right?

honestly I expect some people to be paid off like in 2020 Nov 3rd so we'll never know the truth 🤷‍♂️.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/democrats-sent-73-lawyers-az-know-breaking-president-trump-releases-statement-forensic-audit-maricopa-county-arizona/

[Goforit1010]

I heard they discovered a few hundred ballots had arrived BEFORE the postmark on the envelopes. If that's not fraud, I certainly don't know what is. The next thing... HOW do you trace that back to a perpetrator?

The same with dead people voting. How do you discover the idiots who did that? Or those who send in ballots with illegal addresses? Y'all want proof, there it is.

Ballots like those need to be automatically trashed without even looking at them. Yet all we hear from the left is, "Every ballot counts!" Well... no. Every ballot does NOT count.

All the types of fraud I listed, are exceptionally easily carried out via mail-in ballots - the exact method of voting the Democrats were screaming for all last year. It doesn't take any imagination to realize where it came from and that Biden was the benefactor of that fraud.

[The_Sal]

leftist don't care they want to win at al ll cost.

they're like kids smacking the controller out of your hand because you're winning.

[goaded]

"I heard they discovered a few hundred ballots had arrived BEFORE the postmark on the envelopes."
Who did you hear it from? Because they were probably lying. Or that dead people voted. And what the hell are "ballots with illegal addresses"?

All you've got is imagination.

[Goforit1010]

@goaded - A ballot with an illegal address is an address that doesn't exist. House numbers are not sequential (1, 2, 3, 4, etc...). There's usually several numbers in between. Pick a street and 2 consecutive addresses (for instance 641 and 653 are 2 houses next to each other on the same street). An illegal address, in my example, would be 647 as the house number on that same street. There's no house, no plot of land - that's an illegal address. The USPS has validated multiple cases of such fraud. Businesses are illegal addresses, unless that specific business is also has an actual residence too. Cemeteries, jails, empty lots are all illegal addresses.

As for dead people voting... sheesh. Doesn't take much of an internet search to discover that from the 2020 election. PA was especially horrible about that, having over 20,000 ballots from dead people who had been dead as far back as 20yrs AND a few hundred of them had voted in EVERY election since! Give ya 3 guesses which party's candidate ALWAYS benefits from dead voters. HINT: It starts with a D. You get dead voters because the voter rolls aren't cleaned up annually, like they're supposed to be. Vother roll cleansing is another point Democrats scream loudly against. Their argument is the usual - voter suppression and racism.

Ballots with the issues I pointed out need to be set aside and NEVER counted - EVER. This is what's known as "stuffing the ballot box".

Another guaranteed fraud is when you have more ballots than people listed on the registry OR more ballots than eligible voters in a precinct or county. AUTOMATICALLY, fraud IS happening, that should trigger an immediate recount and audit w/o question.

Voter-ID is one of the most secure ways to severely reduce voter fraud and maintain a valid election. Democrats are ALWAYS against ANY form of election integrity. They claim they want it, but any steps to maintain election integrity are fought tooth and nail to prevent those steps.

[goaded]

You'll have to find me a link for that first one, I can't find it quickly. I know Georgia purged hundreds of thousands of voters on the basis that they'd moved, despite the USPS database (and the people, themselves) saying they hadn't. That's the sort of reckless and undemocratic behaviour Democrats want to avoid.

Consider this. Is a state which is run by one party more likely to lie and say their party won the election, or lost it? Either party. (Not that it actually happens.) How do you explain the Republican-run states that Trump lost?

You should probably try a search engine that doesn't just return the kinds of sites you like. Try http://duckduckgo.com instead. In among sites like the washington times, pjmedia, gateway pundit, and the daily signal, you'll find things like this:

www.factcheck.org/.../
"A misleading claim that more than 21,000 registered voters in Pennsylvania are dead is circulating online. The figure comes from a conservative group that failed to convince a federal judge in October that its list was accurate."

In no way was there any suggestion that 20,000 dead people voted, just that their names hadn't been removed from the voter roll. There were three peole caught casting illegal ballots in PA. They all voted for Trump.

"Another guaranteed fraud is when you have more ballots than people listed on the registry OR more ballots than eligible voters in a precinct or county."
Yes, absolutely, but the places where that was claimed were using old counts, and the numbers had increased since then. Wisconsin, for example:
Claim: "Wisconsin counted 3,239,920 votes but only has 3,129,000 registered voters."
However: "According to the Wisconsin Election Commission, the “State of Wisconsin had 3,684,726 active registered voters on November 1, 2020.”"

I think you're in a bubble of people who want you to believe the election was stolen. Could you at least consider that you might be misinformed?

[goaded]

What was wrong with the first two, exactly? "Wrong" result?

[Soteris]

You mean the private audit by a company that has no prior experience and headed by a trump loyalist which would give them voter information on 7.5 million people? Yeah I dont trust this audit at all to safeguard private information or give an objective and unbiased result.

[The_Sal]

no prior experience?
do you even know what you're talking about or just talking nonsense like most leftist

[The_Sal]

so the audit is legit when democrats do it but when Republicans do it with forensics and sophisticated technologies now it's fake and an issue? lmao

there's a difference between finding discrepancies and just recounting the same fraudulent ballots.. there have already been thousands of ballots found through forensics that say ballots were printed on mass printers with the same machine based circle marking.

[The_Sal]

your party obviously has something to hide or else you wouldn't be sending 75 lawyers in jets to ariaona to try and shut this down lnao

[Soteris]

Yeah. Very legit when the GOP is blocking independent and Democratic election overseers from participating and only have known Trump sycophants be in charge of the audit; and again, the company in question has no prior experience auditing or investigating elections so why choose them aside from them simply being a political loyalist?