Why do “pro life” people care more about an unborn baby than a baby that’s already been born?

doopayo
For decades, the anti-choice movement has attempted to brand itself as “pro-life,” but it’s not hard to see through their bs. As “pro-life” Republicans remain focused on criminalizing abortion, it’s not lost on Americans that this is the exact same Republican party that is hellbent on harming women and families with their regressive policies.

It’s pretty hard to call yourself “pro-life” when you’re actively working to:

Imprison or execute women who access safe abortion care. Tear babies away from their parents and lock them in cages, with no plan to reunite them. Silence doctors and strip reproductive healthcare away from millions of low-income people. Stand by while the maternal mortality rates skyrocket and women—especially Black women—die in childbirth. Deny affordable healthcare coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. Cut programs that feed hungry kids. Block access to HIV testing and treatment across the globe. Incite far-right violence with lies about abortion.

A women’s physical and emotional lives are important — more important, than an unborn fetus.
Why do “pro life” people care more about an unborn baby than a baby that’s already been born?
Why do “pro life” people care more about an unborn baby than a baby that’s already been born?
Why do “pro life” people care more about an unborn baby than a baby that’s already been born?
Why do “pro life” people care more about an unborn baby than a baby that’s already been born?
43 Opinion