Well yeah. Men would almost be completely useless and women will just be men but with vaginas. It's not like men are celebrated for being men who have a dick to impregnate and given rights like women have because they have pussy and the power to give birth which is indeed really valuable. If it also means safeguarding men and letting women do all the hard work dying and being disposed, you cannot expect the world to pre-populate as fast if the ratio is more men than women.
Things would be far more violent and inhumane if women were more in charge. You could argue that the influence of women is largely to blame for this war. Just because more men are in power, a good number of these men are pussywhipped cuck men not fit to lead.
I don't know I think it would take a pretty special woman. Whenever women get power in almost any sense of the word, they seem to feel the need to show that they have equal or greater capacity for brutality than men.
I tend to think more logical then emotional but a lot of other women would think more emotionally. So no i dint think it would help much bt a fair number of men and women working together seems fine
1
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
I don't think gender matters. Each individual being in charge would be different anyways. A conflict between 2 countries is a lot more complicated then just blaming it on men being violent. Also speaking of that, you realize how many men die for their countries in war protecting their country full of women, kids, etc?
I’m sure it would be different since it would be a different person but I do know some pretty evil women out there as well. I read somewhere a while ago about Kim Jung Un sister being more ruthless than he is.
Nobody knows the true answer to that I avoid said in order to understand something you need to experience it you can't just read about it you can't put people against people you have to experience it
There's no evidence to support that. Studies that have analyzed female leaders throughout time have concluded that female ruler's reigns were more brutal and resulted in more death and subjugation than the their male counterparts. For example, two queens of England, Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth, took more territory and conquered and subjugated more people than all the kings of England combined.
Why are these women making it a gender thing? Some bimbo calls herself his mother and someone makes it a gender war You think women politicians get into power cause they want to save lives and stuff? Smh
3
8 Reply
Asker
+1 y
you can be a politician & still have common good values. &also you know the main differences between women & men so you know why
You think Putin is doing this cause he's a man or cause some women rejected him or cause he got mommy issues? He is like a dictator. This is what he does. I am not defending him. But stop associating his psychopathic tendencies with his gender. Also have you never heard of Kim Yo Jung? You think if she ruled N Korea, she's gonna get on her knees and suck some US dicks and then bring peace and glory to N Korea?
It's kinda disappointing people think that women are not strong or capable enough for war
never said that just saying as a leader most caring women would put innocent lives in risk. stop trying to be like one of the guys you’re trying very hard with your lady like words lol
I am stating my opinion. No one gender is better than the other. Both you and that woman in the pic need to research more about why Putin is waging war instead of blaming his testosterone But feel free to delete my "one of the guys" opinion
@Hangry06 The fact that the Asker and that woman in the pic thinks you can just "talk things out" with bad people is so naïve and stupid, it hurts. It's so stupid, it literally hurts their own argument and makes women look like worse leaders by example. It's like the idiots who thought you could defend the police and just use sweet words to rid society of criminals. There's so many failures of academics here, from psychology, to sociology, to history, to political science, to gender-based science, I don't even know where to begin.
Best thing I can say about it is, these women supporting these arguments aren't even capable of enough to care of a houseplant, let alone a nation. While leadership doesn't necessarily have to be better with one gender or another, MOST of the time, men are forced to step up and be leaders, while women can sit back and relax, because society doesn't put as much pressure on women for things like this THIS is why men tend to make better leaders. If society didn't coddle and baby women as much as they do, the strong and capable women could probably step up and rise to the challenge as well. But society worships women and treats men as workhorses at best, and disposable at worse, which usually breeds strength because of it.
I think she’s insinuating that we need more female leaders and that if two morally good women were both leaders they would be able to at least work it out or have war but not in a way that includes hurting innocent lives silly.
When the same thing happens for the Middle East, why aren't people so sensitive? Russia, america and Turkey are bombing the middle east. really you are hypocrites
Its the gas reserves and nato deterrance. Not excusing russias actions one bit. But thats their goal. loot ukraines natural reserves and keeping nato at bay.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
91Opinion
History has already shown that women leaders tend to be even worse.
Women are really bad at controlling their emotions, can't handle being said no to and tend to have overinflated egos.
Best would be to have the leaders and bast leaders in 10 years span be the ones going to the front lines, with regular soldiers when the war starts.
Well yeah. Men would almost be completely useless and women will just be men but with vaginas. It's not like men are celebrated for being men who have a dick to impregnate and given rights like women have because they have pussy and the power to give birth which is indeed really valuable. If it also means safeguarding men and letting women do all the hard work dying and being disposed, you cannot expect the world to pre-populate as fast if the ratio is more men than women.
Things would be far more violent and inhumane if women were more in charge. You could argue that the influence of women is largely to blame for this war. Just because more men are in power, a good number of these men are pussywhipped cuck men not fit to lead.
Unfortunately women can be just as cruel and ruthless as men so no it probably wouldn't be handled differently.
The problem is that its humans ruling the planet. We aren't a very nice species. Kill for sport, covert what others have.
Yeah, I mean for example look at Bloody Mary, queen Elizabeth.
she’s catholic but doesn’t live up to what she does. we need good morally leaders
I don't know I think it would take a pretty special woman. Whenever women get power in almost any sense of the word, they seem to feel the need to show that they have equal or greater capacity for brutality than men.
I tend to think more logical then emotional but a lot of other women would think more emotionally. So no i dint think it would help much bt a fair number of men and women working together seems fine
I don't think gender matters. Each individual being in charge would be different anyways. A conflict between 2 countries is a lot more complicated then just blaming it on men being violent. Also speaking of that, you realize how many men die for their countries in war protecting their country full of women, kids, etc?
I’m sure it would be different since it would be a different person but I do know some pretty evil women out there as well. I read somewhere a while ago about Kim Jung Un sister being more ruthless than he is.
Nobody knows the true answer to that I avoid said in order to understand something you need to experience it you can't just read about it you can't put people against people you have to experience it
There's no evidence to support that. Studies that have analyzed female leaders throughout time have concluded that female ruler's reigns were more brutal and resulted in more death and subjugation than the their male counterparts. For example, two queens of England, Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth, took more territory and conquered and subjugated more people than all the kings of England combined.
Why are these women making it a gender thing? Some bimbo calls herself his mother and someone makes it a gender war
You think women politicians get into power cause they want to save lives and stuff? Smh
you can be a politician & still have common good values. &also you know the main differences between women & men so you know why
You think Putin is doing this cause he's a man or cause some women rejected him or cause he got mommy issues? He is like a dictator. This is what he does. I am not defending him. But stop associating his psychopathic tendencies with his gender.
Also have you never heard of Kim Yo Jung? You think if she ruled N Korea, she's gonna get on her knees and suck some US dicks and then bring peace and glory to N Korea?
It's kinda disappointing people think that women are not strong or capable enough for war
never said that just saying as a leader most caring women would put innocent lives in risk. stop trying to be like one of the guys you’re trying very hard with your lady like words lol
I am stating my opinion. No one gender is better than the other. Both you and that woman in the pic need to research more about why Putin is waging war instead of blaming his testosterone
But feel free to delete my "one of the guys" opinion
Now that i analyse the pic, she really should learn to google and educate herself instead of posting tiktoks acting confused
@Hangry06
The fact that the Asker and that woman in the pic thinks you can just "talk things out" with bad people is so naïve and stupid, it hurts. It's so stupid, it literally hurts their own argument and makes women look like worse leaders by example. It's like the idiots who thought you could defend the police and just use sweet words to rid society of criminals. There's so many failures of academics here, from psychology, to sociology, to history, to political science, to gender-based science, I don't even know where to begin.
Best thing I can say about it is, these women supporting these arguments aren't even capable of enough to care of a houseplant, let alone a nation. While leadership doesn't necessarily have to be better with one gender or another, MOST of the time, men are forced to step up and be leaders, while women can sit back and relax, because society doesn't put as much pressure on women for things like this THIS is why men tend to make better leaders. If society didn't coddle and baby women as much as they do, the strong and capable women could probably step up and rise to the challenge as well. But society worships women and treats men as workhorses at best, and disposable at worse, which usually breeds strength because of it.
*defund the police
I think she’s insinuating that we need more female leaders and that if two morally good women were both leaders they would be able to at least work it out or have war but not in a way that includes hurting innocent lives silly.
Because bloody Mary wasn’t a thing right? Your so damn ignorant I can’t even correct all your points I don’t have the time.
different yes, better who knows.
it's human emotions at play and we all have them. fear, insecurities.
When the same thing happens for the Middle East, why aren't people so sensitive? Russia, america and Turkey are bombing the middle east. really you are hypocrites
Some of the most brutal dictators and monarchs in history have been women.
There have been Countesses who bathed in the blood of 600 virgins (The Diablo 2 villain is based on a real world human woman).
There have been Roman Emperors and Greek Caesars who were ruled by their own mothers, and some of them were about as evil as any man imaginable.
Both men and women can be evil and easily corrupted by money and power *cough Hillary cough*.
I wish people post questions like this when the US invades countries and kills innocent people too
i agree.. it’s wrong anywhere it happens buddy.
Depends on the woman. She can be great or she can fuck shit up as much as a man can.
Its the gas reserves and nato deterrance. Not excusing russias actions one bit. But thats their goal. loot ukraines natural reserves and keeping nato at bay.