
Based on her very lenient sentences with sexual predators and sexual offenders of minors should Kentanji Brown Jackson be rejected as a new justice?


Someone would have to be clinically insane to honestly believe this mother of two young girls, this respected judge who has already been confirmed by this same Senate 3 previous times for lower level judgeships honestly has a soft spot in her heart for sexual predators and sexual abusers of minors.
But when you are Republican Senate scum and you are publicly playing to a base of low IQ idiots who would believe this and are too stupid to see through it, then this is the impression you try to create. Honestly, it's ridiculous and outrageous but given the stupid people those Senators are playing to, it's hardly a surprise.
3 freaking months sentence to a pervert in possession of child porn is long enough for you?
She in her other child porn cases or rape never gave the full length of the sentences under the law at her discretion.
She slways went lenient on these disgusting scumbags.
And her being a mother doesn't mean ish. Some mothers even let their kids be abused by boyfriends.
You didn't hear the case and review the evidence. You don't know the context and you didn't read the sentencing guidelines. All you're going by and taking as gospel is the sensationalized propaganda being put out by people who have a problem with a liberal black woman sitting on the court and that says a lot about you.
Her excuse for giving the 3 month sentence was that the pedophile was only 18... he was close to the age of the kids in the porn.
The pictures were of 8 year olds being raped!!!
What sane person gets off looking at that garbage?
What sane judge gives a light sentence to the sick fucker who does?
@BillyBalls: He desires to make it about politics when I never brought politics into the discussion.
Her record in dealing with pedophiles is very clear. This woman judgment and sense of justice is 💩
If she was a white hard conservative he will be spewing the opposite of what he saying.
All he cares about is making it about right vs left instead of looking at this woman record when dealing with perverts regarding children.
Pick another decent judge to the bench. There's hundreds to pick from.
Again, you only know what spin you've read about what she did by people who have an agenda and you appear to not be nearly bright enough to recognize it. You are reacting exactly the way they designed the spin to get you to react. So congratulations. Drink that Kool-Aid. Drink it up. Every drop.
Did she not give a 3 month sentence to an adult with child pornography possession, yes or no? Its public record of her? So shut the hell up.
Did you listen to the testimony? Examine the evidence? Read her opinion? Did you do any of those things before forming your knee jerk reaction? I'm guessing not. So until you do, I suggest you avoid continuing to make a fool of yourself.
Yes I did hear it actually. Quit defending her because I'm sure you wouldn't do it if she was a conservative nominee. Shows your judgment is bias and unfair.
You heard the case? How did you know to be in court that day? Did you have a crystal ball that told you years later she would be a Supreme Court nominee so you should make sure you hear this case personally cause that would be brought up by Senators questioning her years later? You're not a very convincing bullshit artist.
Tell me something. She's been confirmed by the Senate for her current judgeship and multiple other times for other positions? How come this never came up before? How come it's just being raised as an issue now? Are you trying to tell me everyone was cool with her having a soft spot for pedophiles last June when she was confirmed by the Senate to join the D. C. Circuit of the U. S. Court of Appeals but now all of a sudden, they have a problem with it? You're being manipulated and you're simply not bright enough to recognize it.
What a damn stupid argument you have. Who cares if she knew she was going to be nominated to the Supreme Court or not years later.
A pedophile and pedophilia is a serious crime on the innocent. As judge and all judges throughout the country should come down very hard on such 💩 bags.
3 months sentence shows the guilty he's crime isn't as serious and puts another child to being a victim in the future you dummy.
Just get the hell out of here already.
You're just simply not bright enough to even understand the point I'm making so I'll stop trying. You must be so easy to manipulate. I bet you believe all the conspiracy theory nonsense. Moon landing real or faked? 9/11 inside job or not?
No chance she will not be confirmed. But in the meantime, we get a good demonstration of why people out in the real world don't take pure affirmative action hires seriously...
I watched a little bit of the hearing. When she sat there and made excuses for those that possess child porn, I felt sick. She's garbage, but she will be confirmed.
Opinion
6Opinion
Yes, Jackson should be rejected as a new justices as he has shown a bias to give leniency towards Paedophiles who prey on the most vulnerable in society, she should not be let anywhere near SCOTUS as he is predisposed to changing the law to favour of Paedophiles. The sentences that she handed down to Paedophiles in her court are a matter of public record.
Do you know why QAnon hate her? She's the judge who sentenced the moron with a gun who shot up a pizza place on their say-so to 4 years.
Yeah. She should. She probably thinks it should be illegal for me to sell sex offender details and prison details to North Korea.
Simples...
It'll never happen. No one is willing to risk being a pariah for the rest of their lives for daring to question the authority of a black female judge.
She belongs in a wood chipper, not on the bench.
Yes.
The only opinion from girls was selected the Most Helpful Opinion, but you can still contribute by sharing an opinion!
You can also add your opinion below!