We have free speech in this country even racist can say as much racist things as they want it is protected by the first amendment. Racism is ugly and stupid and makes no sense (unless you’re an atheist in which case it makes perfect sense because if you’re an atheist what’s the point of treating everyone the same?) however in the United States you still have the right to be a racist piece of shit and not get punished for it as far as government coming after you type deal you might get punched but that’s a different story
you have a right to shout fire in a crowd threat yes, (by the way it’s not illegal to shout fire in a crowded theater) if free speech truly exist there shouldn’t be limits on it. Beyond the active all to violence. Like is sally told Tom to kill bill that would obviously be an active all time violence.
This is why say if some one kills someone because of what a political or public figure says we gotta fight like hell isn’t an active call to violence, otherwise we would have to pretty much lock up all politicians and public figures because that common policies speech. This would include everyone form Bernie sanders to Trump on both sides of the political field
What’s funny about the replacement theory is the democrats main stream media was pushing that for years. This difference between the Asswipe who shot up buffalo thought it was a bad thing and the mainstream media thought it was a good thing (of course unless the immigrants are coming from Cuba in which case democrats want to keep Cubans out of the United States because Cubans tend to vote republicans like Ted Cruz and Ron DeSantis.) unfortunately YouTube took the montage video of democrats for a decade now pushing replacement theory. Taking about how the United States is getting less white, They say it’s a good thing the reason why they say it’s a good thing (again unless the immigration is coming from Cuba). Is because they tend to vote more democratic which is now backfiring on them because a lot of Latinos and blacks are for the progressive Marxist push the democrats party has fully embraced at this point.
Of course the reality is it’s a neutral thing who cares of more people of any race comes to the United States it’s not a big deal The only people who thinks it’s a big deal or actual racists
Funny how you didn't call for this after the attack in Waukesha. But if you want to go after "politcians who advertise racism", you're going to decimate the ranks of many racist and race-baiting Democratic politicians.
No I’ve said that numerous times. Black community has double the % of crime than their pop %.
But that’s not the same as taking word for word propaganda from a politician or news show. We had linked it to a Dem candidate (like Stafinek above) your side would go apeshit.
But like the Communists the Democrats are today, their always trying to purge any political dissent, hence the targeting of anyone they don’t like under the guise of going after speech.
And I’m sure you aren’t interested in tracing who radicalized the Waukesha shooter, but I’m sure he waa receptive to some leftists’ standard incitement against whites:
"Should politicians who advertise racism be held accountable after the NY shooting?" No, a shooting shouldn't mean we only now hold them accountable. A racist should've never been a politician in the first place, and a shooting doesn't have to take place for them to be held accountable. Anyone who would harm somebody because of race, gender or age should never be in office.
They are responsible the question is to what extent. If I ran a hate campaign against you personally and people attacked you, then you'd want me held responsible, this is no different and I shouldn't be allowed to hide behind the tired free speech excuse.
You don't think Republicans are intimidating legitimate authorities? Legitimate authorities decided the last election, and a ridiculous number of Republicans don't accept it and are threatening those legitimate authorities.
There were a lot of voting irregularities, there really should be a bipartisan committee review and FBI investigation just to put the issue to rest
Voting by mail causes some issues. The UPS is in a state of major deterioration and can't be relied upon for something so important.
It would probably be better to come up with a secure online voting system that requires an ID and voter registration card or bank sign in partner for added security.
I don't care who wins, but having people doubt the legitimacy of the system is a prelude to civil strife.
You act as if there haven't been multiple investigations into any slightly credible suggestions of voting irregularities, and many that were never really credible. The USPS is being destroyed by Republicans, it needs support, not to be sidelined.
An online voting system (apart from disenfranchising poor people, as usual) would be a terrible idea. Would you really trust the results of an election that is run by computer and that, by definition, wouldn't be anonymous? There are very good reasons for having a paper trail in elections and for having a cut-off point to ensure no ballot is attributable to the voter who cast it.
"... having people doubt the legitimacy of the system is a prelude to civil strife. " Tell that to the Republicans who have been lying about the 2020 election for the last 18 months.
It's pretty stupid to argue that people can't afford ID, or a bank card. Both of which you need to have in order to get welfare.
Online is a better option than paper by mail yes, and it's perfectly possible to design such a system to authenticate a person as a voter, provide a ballot, and submit it without attributing who was voted for to the specific user.
Your fear of computers just shows you don't understand how software works.
The system would be as reliable as whoever makes it. At which point I should point out those sketchy as fuck windows xp based voting terminals who anyone with a thumb drive and a screwdriver can hack.
As for the paper trail, that's why confirming voter registration and ID are sensible steps.
You don't even seem to be capable of argument without contradicting yourself, and you just spout off left wing taking points like a doll with a pull string.
I never said "people can't afford ID, or a bank card". Is there any point in a discussion with someone who would suggest that I had?
I've been writing software for 40 years.
You know the old thing about it doesn't matter who does the voting, it matters who counts the votes? With an online system, you can forget recounts, checking ballots for signs of tampering and various other safeguards. And have you forgotten what the Republicans have been saying about Dominion and Smartmatic? And even the fact that they weren't used in many of the places they're complaining about didn't stop them.
Well, it's quite obvious for the US, specially for the inner cities.
All those poor black americans are quite visibly being replaced.
Of course, you guys pretend you are trying to replace the white majority, but results speak louder than words.
Except with planned parenthood, you actually believed you were genociding black people and that rampart abortion would curb population growth. Imagine being this retarded?
Most Helpful Opinions