Yes
No
Other
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
The standard for both, ideally, is demonstration of an understanding of the pros and cons of every voting decision, and willingness to endure risk of personal loss if need be, to secure the outcome one believes in.
During the nation's founding, this was measured via land ownership. BlackRock and its subordinates have gone to some lengths to make that indirect measurement standard unreliable. The reason there was no automatic women's suffrage, is because traditional inheritance bylaws passed on from English tradition came at a time when only men inherited land. So female land ownership was almost entirely an alien concept. It was assumed women would vote between their legs, and vote for a shyster that would bone everyone over in the end. Rush Limbaugh infamously called it "the arousal gap.". And pointed to women who only voted for Bill Clinton because of his smile.
Men and women must understand the cost of vanity and voting before they vote. Soldiers died for our freedom, not so we could vote ourselves back into slavery to feudalism!
If it came to a vote. It'd likely be a male only vote. And I'd vote yes.
I dont think intelligence has anything to do with it.
I believe the majority of women will always vote with emotion over Logic.
The powers that be have sold women a massive lie and they bought it because it felt good.
Women are more masculine and femininity is being shamed by women.
I think predatory men knew exactly what they where doing when they brought feminism into it.
I'm conflicted on 1 thing. This is America and we should all be equal and free.
No class of people should be denied the right any other group has.
And there are women who's emotions do not rule them. And they're demonized for it ask any anti feminism woman how she's treated.
Not all women vote for domestic issues, I'm a woman and find it annoying when women get obsessed with domestic and they don't care about world events
I think you should be iq tested and allowed to vote only if your IQ is over 105.
Damn, why that high, average isn't enough?
Lol, the average IQ is between 85 and 115. 105 is a good median number for well rounded intelligence and people who would more likely than not think through their decisions carefully.
Opinion
15Opinion
I think there should be a cognition test to vote.
I worked the polls a few years back. The was a levy on the ballot to fund social services like those needed by mental/physically handicapped.
At one point in the day a bus pulled in with a load of people from a live in facility for mentally handicapped people.
They all were registered voters.
They all needed some to go into the booth "to assist them in voting".
I always wondered. How many of those people actually comprehended what they were doing?
No. I don't see any good reason why that would happen. Maybe (maybe) more polls would swing the way I liked if women couldn't vote, but that's not a good reason to ban them from voting. To do that there would have to be some reason like women can't understand things, or they can't make informed decisions. And if that's true, not only voting but a lot of important things would need to change—like family and jobs and sex. It would be like they're all children or have some sort of brain disability.
Ridiculous question that shouldn't even be up for debate. Women have as much right to vote as men. No more, no less!
men and women are not equal. saying otherwise is nice, but not true
@TommyMountainFigure: Not a ridiculous question. You see people like this guy who will take a woman's right to voice politically.
Hell yes, because it's a step in the right direction towards proper autocracy. Also because women have spent the last century demonstrating their poor discernment in statecraft and their complete lack of regard for civilization and how it actually functions.
No because I don't see the benefit in that like what's the point of doing that. If men and women are equal before the constitution they have to have the same rights otherwise they are not equal.
I have no problem with striped women voting; if the Blashko theory is correct, that's most all of them, anyway. But since we made the transitiot from "one vote yer household" ho "one vote per person", I see no reason to exclude women.
No I wouldn’t they already get treated not so well on the cemetery gravesites they build the husband up then all the woman gets is two words beloved wife i’ve seen it at military grave sites
If they take away women voting rights it become a whole different country I don't think 90% of people are ready for.
That means laws don't matter anymore. If you can't take-away rights.
They’ve already started taking choices about her own body away, what’s voting in comparison?
Totally circumstances. One is aborting a life in progress an another is the right as citizens to choose your representatives and leaders.
*different
No. One small percent is what that ban is to prevent, people act like it’s the only reason. People who use it for birth control.
The bans are harming more woman then doing good. Not everyone who has to have a medically necessary abortion actually wants to lose their planned child. The hatred is making people blind to the facts.
It’s all rights.
The body inside your body is not your body. #AbolishHumanAbortion
Educate yourself on the entire topic. Not just what you want to know. Then you might have an argument.
Unborn children are more valuable than adult women
@RandomGuy1030 Do you tell woman that before or after you have sex with them?
Who can still be molded into whatever the future of society needs? The baby, or the thot? Think, Dusty, think!
@ObscuredBeyond All I see are burnt men hiding behind technology, spewing toxic opinions they don’t agree with themselves irl.
You think I wouldn't have gladly made certain sacrifices if I got the privilege to have children?
@ObscuredBeyond All of you entirely miss my points.
The right to vote for women was literally the beginning of the disaster we experience today. They always vote for whatever is more popular and socially acceptable. All you have to do to win is promise them more right and benefits and they will
female voting is not conducive to a sustainable society. They will all collapse after the age of peace ends.
at the very least men and women should not have the same voting age
That's oppression in nature though thus an injustice.
their nature is not conducive to voting. we aren't oppressing their nature. we are allowing it to bloom
democracy oppresses the female nature by asking them to use skills they don't have
C'mon man don't be stupid. You are really sounding stupid right now.
that's not an answer. their votes are always bad for us, and them.
Yes, reason why? Show me a matriarchy that's lasted in history.
What does having a right to vote like every other citizen to do with matriarchy?
I’ll never know why they were allowed to anyways
I think most people have no business voting.
Lol true.
I absolutely would support this. Because without women, no Democrat could have ever been elected President
Man, y'all showing y'all stupidity. 🙄
Most white women voted for Trump in 2016 but that still isn’t most women overall
yes, after they got rights the world turned into mess.
Men are literally in neary all positions of power and yet you blame women? Lol
?
Don't see why they should be, lol.
No, I see no reason for that.
No, because women aren't second class citizens
No way
You can also add your opinion below!