







It depends on if you believe a soul is needed to be sentient. If you do, there's still more philosophical and scientific progress required.
If there is no soul, then sentience is the coalition of our senses being processed in such a way that two nural nural networks build exactly the same way but trained in slightly different ways should develop two different "personalities" similar to how twins work
If there is such a thing as a soul, and if it is like a sim-card in a massively complex neural network of biological mainframe infrastructure, than who is the master programmer? What is the purpose of the source code used by this source💽, or God🙏 entity. Are we organic constructs of biomechanical design in a progressive self-motivated- learning compatible search engine of carbon - based motivational programming, for a specific intended purpose? Am I overthinking this question about source code dynamics and program-operated- intent (user) as a reference guide (👍-Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy) to that esoteric abstraction😇 known as a soul? Am I full of 💩? Your guess is prabably as good as mine🙄. What I do know, is that if we are to become the designers of our own self - aware lifeform operating construct's🧬🛗, than it would be in everyone's best interest that we not inundate them with☣️ programming🤬!
Alright, but we don't really know what the nature of reality is for sure. It could be a simulation and the beings who "built" this world see our whole existence as a novelty, it could be that God is actually a collective of all conscious and non conscious energy that makes up reality and we are all one and creates of our own reality. It could be that time is just an illusion and free will is just an illusion and just like how an ai or computer will come to the same mathematic calculation every time, down to our DNA everything was always destine to play out like this and it's a miracle we even exist.
There's a lot of evidence to support all of these theories but for now it's very uncertain.
Current AI can only do what we programmed it to do. It seems like AI is never going to exist because what we call AI today is machine learning, and not an intelligence. In other words, I think not because we are teaching AI, AI teaches us nothing we didn't already know.
But AI learns more effectively than we do.
Does it, because I would question the ability for Tru comprehension and understanding an AI has of the subject matter it processes. Can an A. I. determine a course of action without a pre-programmed set of protocols or list of options selected in by a user or programmer? Can an a A. I. relate to a value system that quantifies a decision meaking process based on right or wrong printcipal ideologies? Does a computer intelligence know why it should do the right thing, or even what is good or bad, necessary or uneccessary, good or evil? Can such an advanced computing system know why it should act on the data it recieved and processes, to interpret that information in meaningful motivation based action? The ability to make a decision, rather than just run a program because of some automated imperatives dictating it's actions, rather than being utilized to enable independent thought and action?
There's no reason an AI couldn't be programmed with a working knowledge of morals and ethics.
Opinion
6Opinion
"Can Synthetic Life ever attain true sentience?"
As a developer and database designer for over a decade, no. This is moronic to even consider. Its understandable a lay person might think so but its true science fiction. Nothing we have right now would even lead anyone to logically believe this is possible. Maybe with completely unforeseeable technology that does not exist but that would be like a caveman predicting airplanes before even discovering fire. So sure its possible in that regard but its not likely from anything we have even developed. It would not be like a computer as we understand computers.
As a person that likes to ask questions, no question is moronic, unless someone thinks they already know the answers. Synthetic Life does not yet exist, so who is too know what is possible in future R@D or not. To be able to become sentient, that entails a broad range of possibilities based on how one's enterpretations of that definition play out with the increasingly diverse applications of organic and inorganic technologies.
My point, nothing is impossible and no question is moronic except for those deliberately asked to undermine participation in discussion threads.
@Citizenkirk could we make an airplane that flies out of only human feces? that seems like a pretty moronic or even dare i say shitty question but feel free to leave a long detailed answer.
The concept of AI reaching the level of sentience is like asking Ford if we should be concerned about faster than light travel... like that's realistically a concern with the 2023 models. SMH. And that is why its a moronic question because clearly its not even going to be a concern even for 2050 vehicles or any vehicles Ford is likely to manufacture, ever.
I don't have a honest answer to the question
But I do believe, that humans that are building robots with AI Intelligence. They are building machines that one day attack humans and try to wipe out humans off the planet
They sold out their kind, human
I've never seen a publicly available AI application that even appears to be intelligent. The conclusions the applications arrive at show that their collective authors are mentally retarded.
According to Ray Kurtzweil the human brain has already been mapped and a computer will be designed to mimic the human brain. It will work like a human brain with the speed and accuracy of a digital computer.
That's scary! Imagine a powerful computer with the brain of Boris Johnson.
@EnglishEuropean Imagine a powerful computer with the brain of Joe Biden
www.123rf.com/...ut-overheat-chip-on-the-pcb-.html
haha exactly!
After learning about the Terminators... I'm gonna have to say "yes" they're no different than human children. As childern--we adopt what we see and hear in our environment.
yeah... sorry... but, I don't buy Cameron's bullshit... I fail to see how her caring for animals and learning to dace aids her in protecting Johns... girl lied to everyone... including herself.
''dance''
Potentially AI could be more alive and aware than Boris Johnson.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions