Do you want America to be led by Christian nationalists?

[Agape93]

And yes, as they have expressed, that means forcing Christian ideals onto the populace, which is unconstitutional.

[letuswaltzforthedead]

Yes, of course, within moderation. It seems like a proper path for the country to go through, especially if the American government begins protecting it's own citizens over foreign interests once again. Historically, the group that cared for itself and protected it's people was the most likely to survive but it seems that the US is currently on a path to sell itself out to its enemies.

With the Christian part, it would depend. I would need to look further into Christianity to make a solid decision here but I'm assuming you brought it up because of the recent overturning of Roe v wade. That would certainly lead to an rapid population growth depending on the people (all 3 abrahamic religions promote larger families). If the population expands quicker than it can sustain itself, it'll be a repeat of 19th century immigration, what the mid eastern states experienced at the time.

[MzAsh]

No. If they can’t separate their religious views from policy then they have no business leading anything.

[sturdysoldier]

You'd have to define what exactly you mean by Christian nationalists. I don't know that I have a strong opinion on the topic. Though you would do well to remember that America was founded under God (and no, I'm not a Christain).

I can't help but laugh at notions like taking the "under God" part out of the pledge of allegiance. In a very real respect, this nation only exists because of Christianity. Perhaps more specifically: the values and morals that accompany Christianity.

Your query seems a bit provocative. I hope you're not just looking for a rise out of people.

[Anonymous]

Its unconstitutional for the Federal Government to interfere in the establishment of religion, or really do most thing domestically.

Its not unconstitutional for States to do it, which is why most of them did do precisely that before, during, and after ratifying the 1st amendment and would continue to do so in varying degrees for 100+ years.

[FriendlyDrugDealer]

I mean if they want me to toy with them on unethical and immoral values of their god in a debate then sure.


Honestly people have the right to worship whatever they want but keep it to your fucking self. If I worship a frozen bag of peas in my freezer then that’s my business. I’m not gonna go outside and yell at people for not having the same religious beliefs I do.

[SiberFox]

It should be, every thing that made america a leading nation was it's christian values, morals and beliefs. Most of which have been diluted to the current values and beliefs you hold, though twisted for your own benefit rather than the collectives.
If america had retained its christian faith, many socials issues would not be. In fact most issues would be seen for what they really are, lies.

[goaded]

The country's morals and beliefs include the freedom of religion. The third unanimous vote in the Senate's history was to confirm that "the Government of the United States…is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion".

[SiberFox]

And look at what america is now, a cesspit of destructive values and foreign beliefs

[goaded]

What, like in the 18th century?

[SocialEngineering]

I am of mixed feelings. I do not believe any form of theocratic policy should have prominence, nor should public office be politicized such as "the bench" of any court.

I do believe there are aspects of "morality" in terms of Christian values that do have a positive aspect on society. However morality is subjective and cannot be contrived as a static interpretation.

This is why there is supposed to be separation of chruch and state.

[CAPTAIN-OBVIOUS]

No but they should have their own place in America because this is a large percentage of the population so they should be able to practice their religion in their own states or safe places. I’m not talking about just giving them a state or two but a few where they can practice their religion and have the state reflect their beliefs. Anybody who disagrees can move to a state like California.

[goaded]

Or... They could stop trying to impose their religious beliefs on others in opposition to the desires of the people who founded the country.

[jshm2]

When has it not been?

You're not a shit for brains idiot who thinks Obama was "Muslim" are you?

American leaders have always been Christian nationalists, just not Christian elitists

[Agape93]

Nope, I'm not one. I actually educate myself, unlike the piss drinkers

[Agent_Elflord]

No thank you I support the idea of freedom of religion which also means the freedom to not follow religion or follow a different one, as well as the separation of church and state.

[Googlemyahoo]

Isn’t that the case and has been since its inception?

[goaded]

These are the words of the people who literally created the United States:

"As the Government of the United States…is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion–as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity of Musselmen–and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
Treaty of Tripoli, 1797

"This document was endorsed by Secretary of State Timothy Pickering and President John Adams. It was then sent to the Senate for ratification; the vote was unanimous. It is worth pointing out that although this was the 339th time a recorded vote had been required by the Senate, it was only the third unanimous vote in the Senate’s history."
thereitis.org/.../

[maximumpower]

No.
And bc more words are required, "no" again.

[WhiteBoyChill]

I dont give a shit about what’s constitutional or not. Our society is in shambles

[20yearsolder]

I want religion out of the government.

[Anpu23]

No, not at all.

[RealDaveThomas]

As a jew, of course not

[SmokinAces2000]

No but that might be where we are headed

[bigpauly]

No I don’t want that at all

[CloudMassacre]

Nooooooo thank you