Eh... I think it's more like he is just recognizing that you have to be really careful when you're talking about women in today's society. Tate is a remarkably well-spoken and polished man (he wouldn't have the phenomenal interactions with women he does, if he weren't genuinely a good and respectful guy), but none of that eloquence would come through when he was making horrible jokes and phrasing things aggressively. That stuff scares people, whether they actually have reason to be scared, or not.
I personally felt that the world's reaction to Tate was inappropriate, but I did understand why it was happening.
The reality is that men need to step up their game and be the kind of people women can respect, but women have got to understand that they need to get out of the way to make that happen. There are great men out there, like Jordan Peterson, who have garnered a lot of respect from men and women alike, who get absolutely shat on by the internet because the feminist culture of today has a reflexive freak out everytime something involving men doesn't make appeasing women the central focus.
No I he is doing the best possible thing to do in that situation which is to ignore it most of the content that people see about him is clipped most of the people who don’t like him don’t even listen to his streams notice how everyone who says they don’t like him says the exact same thing “Misogynist” that’s the first thing that pops up on google when you google Andrew tate you don’t see clips of when he says women are the most precious people and should be protected and it’s so hypocritical because women make misandrist content all the time and it’s widely accepted all of Drew Afualo content and post are just her talking shit about men and putting men down does she get banned no all Andrew tate is trying to do is help young men because apparently nobody else cares
I never heard of him till he got banned.
So i know he really was goin hard on women.
But i also heard his video he made and i think jake paul posted it.
He admitted it was an act, and was feeding off the angry bitter women hating men because they were paying the bills. He got rich off of lying to them by telling them what they wanted to hear.
He said he has a plenty of women in his family who he loved and respected. But since he can't capitalize off them anymore he had no reason to pretend anymore.
I think after that video it's kinda hard to go back to bashing women, when you just admitted it was an act to sucker the women haters
What you're describing sounds like he's been rejected a lot. He must not be very good in bed. Narcissists usually aren't.
Opinion
15Opinion
I don't see any damage control anywhere in his speech, nor change of his narrative -- it rather depends on what he's asked and what's the topic of the discussion. He was consistent that a woman has an effect on a man, but it depends on what kind of woman that is beside a man.
Thing is that lately plenty of folk cut some small speech out of his 1h-2h-3h interview/debate/podcast that's focused on relations where he legitimately criticizes the delusion, lack of accountability, double-standards and mistakes of plenty of modern women, and then some people get triggered by it (typically those who actually fall under the criticism; if you youtube reactions and carefully *listen* to what those who criticize him have to say, you'll realize they pretty much make his words true, without even realizing it. It's often highlighted in comments to such videos, unless comments are closed or are heavily moderated).
You seem to enjoy hating and frankly your language and tone supports some of his conclusion. Do you think people remain stationary? you may. but most do not. He's a sneaky old bastard up to dethrone whatever Feminist thing that you protect, through Dislike, in your head...
How about embracing Change without an assumption of it being overly calculated. Frankly, you strike more a a cancel culture and no free speech proponent unless it fits your agenda.
Just a thought...
The only time I have ever heard Tate speak was on Piers Morgan's show. I don't necessarily agree with what he said but I think if he worded it a little differently, I would be more in favor.
For example, he says that men have "authority" over the women. Now, Piers took that to mean that men must be tyrants which isn't what Tate meant once he explained further, but I think that misunderstanding could have been avoided if he used "responsibility" instead.
He also said that depression isn't real or something like that, which is as oversimplified of a solution to depression as it gets. After explaining his reasoning, he really means that, when you are depressed, you are not as helpless and hopeless as you think you are. Depression is a solution that you can solve yourself, no therapy or drugs are necessary. I agree with this to an extent, the problem is the solution to depression heavily depends on the person.
it's not really damage control. he's always had content that focus on general success, business, economic and relationship advice.
his content on modern women is only a small proportion of what he puts out but due to it being so controversial, people want to blow it out of proportion. even then he's technically not wrong in his assessment on modern women even if you disagree with his solutions and outcomes.
The guy is a business man, what do you want from him?
The guy decided to be a muslim because its good for business being friendly with gulf states.
I’m a muslim and let me tell you, nothing about what he does is allowed in islam.
The guy owns clubs for fks sake, thats like putting everything that is forbidden and mixing it in a mixture.
i think on past he intentionally try draw people attention by being as controversial as possible ,
he is famous now , so he didn't really need to push so hard anymore,
like many popular influencers , i would say he is good "actor"
i believe he had only one intention from beginning , to make money
Of course. He already came out and said he realises he could have formulated his options better and given better advice. So he's moving on and changing up some of his ideas, that's expected.
u isn't that a tactic...
build through controversy... then slowly lose the audience, when you actually try to do something, lol
So what’s the point of this question when it’s biased?
It’s so funny how triggered y’all got with him. He must have really been dropping some truth bombs to get you so riled up.
Too late and meaningless anyway. Every sane and decent person already knows what an absolute psychopath that guy is.
No. He's got his fame, and is now branching out into something more profitable.
All them MGTOW boys are moderating themselves. It's necessary for the industry to survive. MGTOW is industry. Soon to be federally subsidized.
I don't know, I don't pay attention to him.
lolㅤ
You can also add your opinion below!
