- 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIf the war breaks out in Europe it could actually be a good thing, think how quick the illegal immagrants fuck right back off again..
Europe is a melting point on anger and its getting worse day by day and we are all sick of it. We should take north korea stance of immagrantion with a big sign with fk off not welcome on our borders11 Reply- +1 y
You are crazy. Europe is very calm and dealing whit the war situation very well. Nothing bad hapen for the moment. Russia become more agresive day by day because they know they can't hurt us in any way exept by nuks or using propaganda on fools who belive it
Most Helpful Opinions
11.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's just another war. Glass em both if you want to end things
00 Reply
12.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It was largly unnecessary. NATO was wrong to subvert Ukraine. It is going to leave Ukraine like it left Iraq
01 Reply- +1 y
WTF? Ukrain have all the right to join NATO + >UKRAIN DIDN'T WANT TO JOIN NATO BEFORE CRIMEA ANEXATION< THEY ANTED TO JOIN EU BUT NOT NATO.
AFTHER THE INVASION IN 2014 UKRAIN DECIDED TO JOIN NATO AND THEY ARE RIGHT TO DECIDE SUCH A MOVE.

Well it helped showcase the ever existing hypocrisy.
03 Reply
Asker+1 yDamn so true
- +1 y
DAMN SO FALS. WHO MADE THIS MEME IS AN IDIOT
- +1 y
Afganistan protected Binladen so they whas colaborating whit him.
Iraq whas a reben dictatorship who had attack many country before even Iran for 8 yares
Yugoslavia didn't respect the international laws for wars and attack civilian in the safe area claimed by UN. This kinde of behavior force NATO to take actions. (i still agree for Yugoslavia whas way to harsh considering they suren in just a couple of day afther the Belgrad bombs)
In Siria the revolt bring USA in whit the terorist grups of ISIS and AL-QUIDA + Russia and Saudit arabia (is a huge mess in Siria) but it's still for USA intervention, today Russia control moust of Siria.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
5Opinion
- 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yRussia shows its true face. That face known only to Eastern European countries, a monstrous and bloody face from the desire for expansion.
Russia cannot accept that small countries decide their own fate. Russia wants all its neighbors to be weak and completely dependent and subservient to it. What Russia has gone through in this world is only poverty, theft, corruption, ugliness. Russia has never done anything good for another nation. Today, there is no nation through which Russia has passed and it prospered in the end.
When a nation wakes up and comes to its senses, Russia will want to bring it to its knees again.
In 2014, Ukraine wanted to join the EU because of poverty and corruption. Russia was there to bring them to their knees again.
Ukraine was scared and angry, so they even asked to join NATO after Russia invaded them that year.
They are not theories, it is the cruel reality that has been happening in this part of Europe for centuries before this war.
Russia must be wiped off the face of the earth like Nazi Germany. v00 Reply - 5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yIts a total freaking mess and Putin needs to be taken out.
10 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yI support Russia and Putin and hopefully he takes all of Europe too and executes all the globalist leftists.
00 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yUS politicians invested in lockeed Martin and the rest are laughing all the way to the bank.
066 Reply- +1 y
What USA had to do whit this?
Is just Russia and Ukrain.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 money.
- +1 y
WTF? USA didn't do nothing, they even told Russia to not attak Ukrain before 24 Feb.
WTF money USA win when they are donating money to Ukrain and the same money come back for wapens. Is just lose for USA economy at this moment.
Russia is the one who try to control this war. - +1 y
Why will you refuse to accept the reality that Russia is an agresive terorist state same like Nazy Germany who neger get punishment afther the WW2?
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the US military is giving Ukraine military equipment that they intend to replace along with loans that they will likely have to pay back to the US in exchange for bases, to allow us companies good trade deals and rights to exploit Ukrainian national resources and of course rebuilding contracts.
Nothing free comrade.- +1 y
You are crazy, that not how it work, if it whas like this why is today Germany rich adther WW2 and all West Europe? Why didn't USA take over thous countrys as well?
USA invest and give money and equipment to Ukrain so they can win and join EU and NATO and become a more stronger nation, more prosper so they can have another rich partener just like Japan, S. Korea, and West Europe. Where ever USA had been is prosperity. Where ever Russia had been is poverty.
Is clear you are from USA or Russia and had no ideal od the true history of Russia.
You are acusing USA and didn't say a word about RUSSI WHO INVADE!!!
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 I will give you an example during WW1&WW2 America supplied the British empire Arms, loans and food in exchange for free trade, gold, territory and Britain was only done paying their war debt back to the US in 1999.
The US did take over axis countries and made sure occupied countries like Greece, France and Italy didn't become communist.
Why would the US want Ukraine to become part of the US Hedgemoney? Simply money. You notice that virtually all of the former warsaw pact are now part of nato and soon Georgia and central Asian countries. If they are trading favourably with the US instead of Russia its better for the US.- +1 y
I think you smoke the same thing like Putin. Nobady wanted communism in Europe and USA ocupaid the west part of Europe exept UK. USSR did the same. But USA left afther Marchel plan had succed will USSR stay will 1991. You can't ignore Russia and say is USA faul. USA had nothing to do whit this conflict. Even my country have USA army and France army and I'm very happy whit it. Better then Russian army
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 France recently rejoined Nato but I don't think the US has any bases there.
Large groups of people wanted communism espicially some of the partisans in France, Italy and Greece who fought the nazis.
Russia used Eastern Europe to rebuild their country. The US emerged the richest nation in the world after ww2 with free global trade established and the wealth of the old European empires in their banks.- +1 y
Who the hell told you that Russia rebuilt the Eastern Bloc? They partitioned us with the Nazis (Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact), they attacked some of us, others threatened us with war, some of us surrendered our countries, others died in bloody battles and others surrendered parts of their territories.
Our grandparents and great-grandparents were deported to Siberia and Kazakhstan. They wanted to wipe us off the face of the earth from the occupied territories. They stole EVERYTHING from us, our food, clothes, jewelry, watches, raped our women and shot our men. They put prisoners and people without morals in key positions of the state. They falsified our elections and forced us to be communists and they never accepted any other form of freedom and democratization. Today the Eastern Bloc is the poorest part of Europe, and the former Soviet countries are torn by inter-ethnic conflicts between Russians and natives, wars and separatism.
Russia did not rebuild anything, they also lied in 1944 that they were coming as liberators, but in no country they liberated did the population not want their liberation, but liberation by the British and Americans.
I'm from the Eastern Bloc, everything Russia has done is ugly, cheap, unartistic, stupid.
Look at what West Germany looks like and what East Germany looks like. - +1 y
What the Americans did is very good, it's called investment. Europe didn't have any money after the war, and this makes it logical to borrow money from the Americans, who knew that Europe would prosper, make you profit and pay off their war debts. Something that in the East meant millions of deaths due to hunger, unreal queues for 40 years for food such as bread and milk. The meat was something almost unreal, cold houses, cold water, terror through secret services, the loss of companies through nationalization and the destruction of their economy through sovroms (Russian debt payment programs towards Russia). The Eastern Bloc paid the war debts 50 times more than it was due to Russia, although we were victims, and RUSSIA WAS THE ONE WHO SHOULD HAVE PAYED.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact was for half of Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Finland. The Eastern block is all the countries the Soviets took from the nazis in the east. upload.wikimedia.org/.../Eastern_bloc.png
The Soviet Union was broke, the Nazis basically flattened most of its cities. The soviet union used the wealth of Eastern Europe to rebuild their country.
Britain was broke after ww2, the Americans forced them to pay back their war debts and in turn the US invested this money in west Germany, Italy and Japan. So while these countries were being rebuilt Britain was still trying to rebuild their bombed out cities. Rationing in Britain lasted until 10 years after ww2- +1 y
Ribentrop-Molotove whas olso for Romabi. Romania, Hungary, Finland decided to be friend whit Nazy Germany to get protections from USSR and some of them for new border. Ration in East Block last for more then 40😑 and most of the time whas not enought food. My parents told me how they wake up to waith in lines at 3-4 in the morning for bread and milk. This situation whas j real in West. USA did good. Now i live in UK and they have good price for food, bills, lot of activitys and turistical place. The GBP in the stronges curency from Europe stronger then Dolar
- +1 y
You have already 3 people who disagree whit your afirmations. And you share your opinions anonimusly
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Romania, Bulgaria& Hungary were part of the Axis and fought against the soviet union.
These aren't affirmations but merely facts.- +1 y
And sooo proud we did. Hungary is the only one who had no reson to invade, but they did it. Russia anex Basarabia from Romania in 1812 and 1941 AND 1944 and tare it apart afther 1945(last yare may be not corect). Russia whas PURE EAVILE IN WW2 JUST LIKE NAZY
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Hungary was beholden to Germany and Italy for awarding it part of Czechoslovakia in 1938 and approving its annexation of Northern Transylvania from Romania in September 1940. Hungary's leaders were also eager for preferential economic treatment from Nazi Germany. Hungary joined the Axis alliance on November 20, 1940.
- +1 y
Yes, but all nations needed an official reson to declare War. Do you know what whas the respn of Hungary to invade USSR?
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the Germans bombed them and said it was the soviet union or the Hungarians bombed themselves.
- +1 y
A Hungarian airplan who fly by mistake in USSR air space whas destroyd by USSR. War declaration afther.😒
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 so a Hungarian warplanes flew into a warzone and got shot down? Imagine that. If that was all it took then the Allies should have been at war with Switzerland.
- +1 y
I kno, but Hungary whas a pupet of Nazy, they just need to declare war some how. But all others had all the resons to inade USSR
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 willingly joined the axis. Accepted territory in 1938. Other countries choose to fight the nazis, even Finland.
- +1 y
Finald inade USSR in 41 as well and sign the treat for not becoming communist whit Nazy. Finland stop at Leningrad, over ther they stop fighting.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 yeah but they were at war with the soviet union, they had already been invaded. They also fought the nazis at the end. Finland also protected their Jews.
- +1 y
Same for Romania, same for Hungary, same for Bulgary, same for Poland. All of them fight on 2 sides.
But the whorst whas USSR. It what better for the East Block whit Germany then it had been whit the USSR.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 not really. The nazis once they had defeated Russia would have ethnically cleansed Poland, Bulgaria, hungry and Romania and turned all you guys into slaves as they saw you all as sub human.
- +1 y
That is not true, will had kill and jews and slavs, but the Latin people whas still a good position. Romanian are not slavs. We will had have the same status like Italy and Spain.
Germany even promise Romania personaly he will give us all the land back if we stay to the very end and win.![What do you think about Ukraine Russia war and how other countries are reacting to it?]()
You may not know but Antonescu (Romania leader 1941-1944) whas very respected by Hitler and whas the only one who whas able to stand up against Hitler in case they disagree.
Hitler make him that promise again when the war whas lost in 1944 (NOT ENDED) and he told to Hitler he will try to make some how peace whit UK and USA because we couldn't stand anymore. BUT NOT PEACE WHIT USSR. Hitler get angry to the point all the house hear him schreaming "HOW THE FUCK HE DEAR TO STAND AGAINST MY ORDERS?" in a private room whit his generals.
Hitler whasn't Stalin. The extermination of jews started around the yare of 43 more exactly and before that they whar use a cheep laber force (STILL PAYD). USSR DIDN'T PAY THE PRISONS IN THE GULAGS!!! THE SOVIETS EVEN RE-OPEN SOME CONCENTRATION CAMPS OF GERMANY IN POLAND AND BRING BACK POLISH AND JEWS WHO HAD BEEN IN THOUS PLACE BEFORE.
NO MATTER WHAT GERMANY HAD DONE, USSR IS HAD BEEN WAY MORE TERIBLE.
- +1 y
Hitler was an artist, while Stalin was a thief, drunk, terrorist who let both his boys die without a care. One in the hands of the Germans, and another drowned in alcoholism, his own daughter abandoned him and fled to the USA!!!
USA IS BLESSED LAND
www.simplestuffworks.com/.../usa-flag.jpeg
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the Nazis believed Romanians to be slavs. Romanians are not Romans they are the descendants of slavs, tracings, dacians, samartians and huns who came from the east and were amongst those who pushed the germanic tribes such as the goths, vandals, Franks, angles and saxons and lombards to invade and take over the Western Roman empire. Antonescu was a traitor and executed for war crimes.
Hitler was a junky who molested in his niece and had a deformed penis.- +1 y
Watch out how the F you talk about my country, you russian are meaningless, mixing yourself whit more then 200 nation to create this malfunction abomination you today call nation.
Romania whas the moust respected in the AXA and apreciated for its 1/3 part of resources to the aliances and military suply.
Antonescu whas never a traitors HE IS A HERO!!! ONLY MORONS CALL HIM THAT WAY people who are today 80 and sik of communist ideology but the people whit schools know he is a hero!!!
He is from my hometown. If he whasn't in power today we will had talk russian, but because Antonescu we are still fucking here and as ROMANS AS EVER!
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 apart from the oil Romania was a liability to the Nazis.
Antonescu was a coward and a nazi puppet, the traitorous war criminal got what he deserved. Romania was briefly part of the Roman empire up until it was conquered by slavs and before that it was hunnic tribes and tracians- +1 y
I swer i will had kill you if we whas in real life.
We participate whit the second largest amry from AXA arounde 800.000 people.
Germany even ask for Romania cavalery to step in the battles. You can see horses in Germany army on internet, thous are from Romania moust of them and help a lot to suport the ovensive against USSR.
Antonescu refuse many time to do Hitlers order and lead the war in his own way, witch whas better and save more romanian lifes and still bring victorys.
Hitler force Antonescu to fight to the very end and he litteraly say to Hitler in face "FUCK OFF". Antonescu had done what whas supose to be done before him in 1940. FIGHT THE USSR IN 1941 TILL 1944.
He had been back stab by the communists, people like you who don't care about humans lifes. Antonescu understand that Germany and USSR are not his friends but he need to use Germany against USSR. Germany even want to anex use in the fisrt part of Barbarosa plan till Carol II start to make good relationship whit them.
GLORY TO ANTONESCU, THE SOVIET KILLER!!!
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Roman cavalry to pull wagons to the front. The German army used millions of horses during ww2.
Antonescu did what he was told by Hitler , he came to power as a traitor and its how he lost power. He was already betraying his master Hitler in 1944 seeking a peaceful surrender. The king of Romania and the Romanian army hot rid of him.
https://youtu.be/LyZK8k4gzyg- +1 y
Antonescu whas alwase put under presure to make prace. But that whasn't a good option till 1942 afther Stalingrad.
He come in to power as the only person who can do the dirty job, fight USSR. We never want to fight to the very end whit Germany, we wanted to be able to do the same like Finland, fight for what is our. Antonescu whas the only one who did that.
And whit Mihai, that a complicate situation, nobady can't tell what will had happen if the king will not take him down.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 well Antonescu died like a cowardly war criminal should.
- +1 y
Antonescu died with military honor, executed by the platoon under his own command, no high-ranking military man has ever had this honor in an execution, and he was also tried by a communist tribunal composed of the group from the Kremlin, damn
His last words were "AHA! YOU MISSED!"
He refused any pardon from the king and he himself asked to be executed at that court, saying that they (Romanian communists) do not even deserve his ashes.
Who did he betray?
Which way did you want him to take us? RUSSIA WAS AND WILL BE ROMANIA'S MAIN ENEMY. This has been a fact since 1812 when they stole our land as "liberators". - +1 y
King Mihai asked him to make peace with the allies.
Antonescu accepted and said that he is starting discussions with the UK and the USA.
The king asked him about the USSR, Antonescu said that a dialogue with them was excluded and would not be tolerated (something that even the USA and the UK requested).
Antonescu is arrested as a result of his refusal and inflexibility, but King Mihai also did not hold any dialogue with Stalin when he joined the Alliance camp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dY1SdA9fYW8&t=37s - +1 y
Carol II can be called a traitor, for the responsibility he assumed, by subverting royal dictatorships. He was responsible for the decision not to fight against the USSR in 1940, blaming the crown council for the negative vote on the war.
The first round of consultations:
11 against the defensive war
10 for the defensive war
4 for negotiations with the USSR
1 abstention
Round 2 of consultations:
19 against the defensive war
6 for defensive war
1 abstention
FINAL AND EXECUTIVE DECISION OF THE KING, against defense (If this King Carol II decided to fight against the result of the consultation, it was a completely different story).
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Antonescu was arrested and executed as a war criminal and his role in holocaust, this was the agreed fate of all axis war criminals at the yalta conference.
- +1 y
Antonescu for 4 years washed Romania's shame for ceding the territory following the Ribentrop-Molotov Pact
![What do you think about Ukraine Russia war and how other countries are reacting to it?]()
Explain to me why the Russians sit with the Nazis and sign documents and complain if it is said that they were enemies? The Russians were allies of the Nazis from 1939 to 1941. - +1 y
The Yalta conference, another mess. Allied countries and victims, uninvited and unconsulted, of Nazi and Soviet aggression. The USSR executed anyone who was against them.
Following the annexation of Bessarabia in 1940, the USSR carried out a series of deportations of Romanians to the Siberian tundra and their replacement with Russian-speaking population as well as Ukrainian and Belarusian ethnic groups, not only Russians, many of these Russian-speaking people with Soviet citizenship were and Jews, those who could not justify their domicile in the period 1940-1941 were executed and deported to Transnistria, they being Soviet occupiers.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 why should Romania get a say at thd Yaltz concurrence when they were the enemy. Only the big 3 who were doing the fighting and had not surrendered got a say.
- +1 y
Because is our suzeran teritory! Same for Poland, Czech-Republic, Baltic States, Bulgary!!!
- +1 y
Teoreticly for us whas the War!!! UK AND FRANCE whas supose to protect our borders by the treetes they accepted before the War. Witch they didn't even for Poland who whas the entire war started.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 you want a say after surrendering? Czechoslovakia surrendered without firing a shot despite having a well trained and equipped military with tanks and planes and preperared fortifications. Half of all German military equipment came from the Czechoslovakia military in 1939. Poland was a threat to Russia and had invaded Russian territory during the Russian civil war.
France was defeated in 1940 and the British empire was too weak to help Poland. It was ultimately up to Poland to defend themselves.- +1 y
The war started on 1September by Germany and Poland had fight and waited for France to invade Geany.
At 17 September USSR invade Poland as well in the east SOOOOO that mean USSR should had been in war whit UK.
Same like todat, UK should be OFFICIALY in WAR whut RUSSIA and USA should be in WAR as well.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 France wasn't ready for war in 1939, Poland should have prepared better and fought harder.
The US &UK don't owe Ukraine anything. Maybe Poland should attack Russia instead of cowering behind the US Military's Johnson- +1 y
France whasn't ready even in the revolution time, still in 1939 France had way bigger army the Germany.
Poland whas havin only 20 yares of independence.
Poland even fight whit horses the german tanks. They fight with all they had.
UK, had trup in France land, the reson they whasn't prepare is stupid.
They simply decide to underestimate Germany and they use that one.
UK and USA own all the Ukrain teritort from the memorandum of Budapenst 1994. Ukraine had been requested to give up the nuks to be recognise independent. Russia whas part of that agreement and all 3 nation brake that treety
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Poland had a comparable sized army to Germany. Czechoslovakia had tanks why didn't poland? Germany was basically a horse drawn military.
It was recognised and promised by Western leaders that Ukraine and the other former Soviet and warsaw pact countries would not join NATO & the EU, which was broken.- +1 y
Poland had shit army in 1919. They win the war whit Lenin Rusia because
1. The army whas devided in red and whit.
2. Moust of the red army whas fighting in the Siberia.
3. Moust of them whas unequipt and starving
4. Ukrain whas pushing for independentcy as well
5. Russia economy aftger WW1 whas death.
About Ukrain joyning NATO, in the NATO aliance there is not such specification or internationals agreememts on that.
Austria is not part of NATO because internationals agreements.
If Putler keep claiming that why not he had at last a copy of that agreement and photos from singing that agreement with NATO or at last USA?
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08
1. Russia had a shit army in 1919 so did Germany. So what's Poland's excuse?
2. The red army was fighting everywhere.
3. Everyone was starving.
4. Ukraine lost their war of independence because they were Anarchists.
5. Russia economy was always crap b4 ww1. Stalon modernised in within 20 years.
Guarantees were made about the expansion of NATO but were not kept.- +1 y
Germany army in WW1 and WW2 whas one of the stronger in 1941 Germany whas having the grates army in the world.
About NATO witch are thous guarantees?
In NATO can joine who even want and who keep up whit the minimum standards. Is not any other nation devision what other should do
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 in 1919 the German army was practically non existent. Poland was defeated in 1939 not 1941.
NATO the US didn't keep their word and aggressively built the largest most powerful military presence on Russia's boarders and threatened the Russian economy.- +1 y
The German army was extremely modern, there was no cavalry in the German army until the invasion of the USSR.
The tanks were the most modern in Europe after the T-34, the only one that scared the Germans. The German tanks were equipped with radio stations compared to those of the allies who had no means of communication between the tanks.
Poland fought until its final conquest due to the 2 declarations of war by France and the UK.
How big was the Polish military in 1939?
Each army consisted of 2–5 infantry divisions, 1–2 cavalry brigades, 3–5 artillery divisions, 2–4 tank companies, 2–5 air squadrons, and others. The armies had a total of ca. 60,000–100,000 soldiers.
How big was the German military in 1939?
On September 1, 1939, Germany, employing 85% of her forces (1.5 million) attacked Poland from three sides. During the 36-day campaign, the Poles inflicted heavy losses on the Germans [i] who suffered a total of 16,000 [ii] officers and men killed; 27,278 wounded; and 5,029 missing.
Germany could take over all of Poland and without the USSR, together with the USSR it secured a small friendship so as not to be attacked on two fronts (around the back) - +1 y
Any country in this world, apart from Germany and Japan, is allowed to create as many armies as they want and can support. Whether they are Russia's neighbors or not.
It is not the problem of Russia's neighbors that they are not able to recover their economy despite the size and resources they possess.
Russia wanted communism, then these are the results, a shitty future and sick economy.
NATO is a defensive alliance, it has absolutely never been activated except in the case of Afghanistan.
Instead, Russia attacked Rep. Moldova (die for this), Georgia, even Ukraine, which did not intend to join NATO until the annexation in 2014.
Ukraine only wanted to join the EU (an ECONOMIC alliance), this did not put Russia in any danger because the EU has no military obligations. ONLY NATO (AND THESE ARE DEFENSIVE ONLY!!!)
Russia also commented in 2004 that "Why did you join NATO". It's about Romania, where I'm from. And our answer for Russia was "BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE WANTED!!! WE ARE A SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE!!!"
Suzerain - clearly defined borders and masters over them
Independent - state that represents itself on the stage of international politics, that can make its own decisions
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the German army had a mechanised Corp that spearheaded the advance backed by ground attack bombers and the rest was infantry that marched into battle, rode bikes, travelled by train and canal boat and logistics done by horses as they lacked trucks and lorries
The german tanks in 1939-40 were inferior to tanks like the British matilda and French char B heavy tanks. French tanks were the best in the world in 1940. The size of the polish army in 1939 is the number of men they could conscript ages 16-60, just like France or Britain and they knew war was coming.
Stalin saw an opportunity for more territory.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 Japan is building its military up, aircraft carriers as well. Germany is under pressure from NATO to build up their military but don't want to spend the money.
Russia is filthy rich but due to capitalism the wealth is tied up in the hands of oliarchs
NATO bombed Serbia and intervened in Kosovo. NATO bombed Syria both ISIS and Assad.
The EU sets tariffs on non EU members thus undermining the Russian economy.
NATO is not a defensive alliance, its about giving the US bases in Europe to project power ie bombing nations outside the US Hedgemoney and deploying troops from like in the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan, bombing Libya, Syria etc for the last 80 years.- +1 y
Female tiger tanks were the most feared. There is no better model than the T-34.
In 1940, the German tanks were clearly superior and were already preparing the Barbarossa operation. A German tank always destroyed several enemy tanks both in the East and in the West.
The strength of an army is not in the number of people, Russia proves this to you in the winter of 1939 and in the Barbarossa invasion of 1941.
The strength of an army depends on the level of training of the soldiers and their equipping with war tools and vehicles. Something that was offered to the USSR by the AMERICANS.
NATO bombed Serbia because Milosevic intervened militarily in UN civilian protection zones (extremely small bases for sheltering families affected by the war). NATO recognizes that the bombing of Belgrade was a wrong and exaggerated decision, something that Romania constantly affirmed until it joined NATO (Romania was in the process of joining).
- +1 y
Romano-Serbian friendship is strong and we helped the Serbs without even upsetting the NATO members. Today, Serbia has no resentment towards us because we are part of NATO and they are not.
ISIS was a terrorist organization that expanded on the territory of Syria and Iraq.
Against ISIS, even Russia agreed that it must be intervened and accepted small collaborations with the USA/NATO in Syria and Iraq. Today, Iraq is freed from ISIS and it is the USA that has blood-stained hands in the local intervention, not NATO.
NATO intervened in Syria as a result of the numerous terrorist attacks that took place in France, UK, Spain, Germany, Austria, etc. and even so it was a limited intervention because it does not include all members of this organization, there was no need for an official declaration of war because it was not a war to remove the regime (This is what the USA wants to do) - +1 y
The EU has imposed sanctions and traffic restrictions on Russia and Belarus. My friend from China also enters the EU board through Turkey.
All ex-Yugoslav countries I want to cross the EU space and if they are not member countries (Bosnia, Albania, Serbia) as well as Rep. Moldova, Georgia, Turkey, etc.
The Eastern Bloc supported these restrictions for years, even before the outbreak of a conflict in 2014.
Russia attracts their antipathy by their own actions.
There is no developed and rich country where people emigrate and which was dominated or influenced by Russia. THERE IS NO SINGLE ONE!!
But where the USA set foot, there was always prosperity and development where it was left to work, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Western Europe.
EVEN IN AFGHANISTAN, THE AFGHANS GAVE THEIR LIVES SO THAT THE AMERICANS WOULD NOT LEAVE, THEY HOLD ON TO THE American AIRCRAFT UNTIL THE LAST SECOND OF THEIR LIVES.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 tiger tanks were most feared by the Allies but the US had the Pershing heavy tank & Russian Iosif Stalin heavy tank bith were superior to the Tiger. Best tank of the war was the Panther. The British had the superb comet.
The Sherman was superior to the T34 as shown in the Korean war.
Doesn't change the fact that NATO is just an extension of the US war machine that allows the US to deploy and attack anywhere.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 the terrorist attacks in Europe by isis was because the US was bombing ISIS after arming, training and funding them.
NATO didn't intervene in Syria because they thought the rebels they had armed would overthrow Assad but they turned into ISIS and Russia intervened to support their Syrian allies. The US started a revolution in Syria because Assad refused to let America build an oil/gas pipeline through Syria linking Qatar to Europe which would undermine the Russian economy which sells oil/gas to Germany- +1 y
Personally, I'm very happy with the American troops in my country, it's a shame that they don't want to annex us to that USA, yes the country with a strong economy.
No one from Europe is bothered that the Americans are here, except for Russia, and if Russia is upset, THEN MORE SHOULD COME.
Russia is like a bully who gets angry that his victim grows taller and builds more muscles.
Opinion Owner+1 y@Alexandrubaschet08 any country with an American bsse is ruled by America. The EU is the strongest economy in the world
- +1 y
So? Where is the problem?
Economy growing, better politicians the the previos onces.
Better army.
How many country had and are prospering under USA and how many under Russia?
Under Russia i tell you, zero, evrybody HATE THEM, even theyr own brothers like Polish, Czech and UKRAIN!!!
3.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Is it still a thing? Or are we between seasons 1 and 2?
03 Reply- +1 y
That's is your problem. But the war keep going and lots and lot of events are happening.
- 2.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
+1 yHope it ends soon. Terrible the deaths
20 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 


Most Helpful Opinions