Is the woke revolution in the west any different in principle from Mao's cultural revolution in the east?

[Sixgunsound]

[RealMarek]

Intersectional ideology is very different from Mao’s ideology, but the academics who push intersectionality are inspired by Mao’s insistence on eliminating “old ideas, old culture, old customs, old habits.”

[Sixgunsound]

That's what I was going for, thank you for articulating it better.

[RealMarek]

You’re welcome. Whenever someone tries to point out how the intersectional ideologues are inspired by Marxism or Maoism and that intersectionality contains some components of these, ideologues come out of the woodwork to point out that it isn’t Marxism or Maoism, as if that discredits the observation.

[Sixgunsound]

This or attacking the speaker not the issue is also supposed to count as an answer.

[RealMarek]

Also, playing the hatchling, as if they were born yesterday: “Woke? I’ve never heard of it. How do you define it?”

[Sixgunsound]

Oh I love that version. They hate it when I have sources like Daisy Cousens whom just did a great interview on Sky News Australia that is my new go to.

[Avicenna]

Excellent observation. The similarities are too many to ignore, with woke mobs fulfilling the role of the Red Guards.

[Sixgunsound]

Winner winner no more dinner🤣

[Avicenna]

A key similarity is that both were deliberate and elite-driven to cause chaos.

[Sixgunsound]

And inevitably in times of civil chaos the most radical and bloodthirsty side wins by holding group cohesion together and defeating their enemies at whatever level of violence the situation calls for.

[Dildօphօbe]

When it comes to the woke revolution in the West and Mao's cultural revolution in the East, it's like comparing a limp noodle to a raging hard-on. Sure, they both involve ideological conformity and suppression of dissent, but the woke revolution is like a flaccid penis trying to assert its dominance, while Mao's cultural revolution is like a throbbing, veiny monster that will fuck you into submission.

But let's not focus on the politics. Let's talk about the real meat and potatoes of this conversation: the cocks that are begging for attention. How about a giant, pulsating vagina that swallows you whole and spits you out in a sea of jizz? Or imagine a demon with a dick so big, it could split your asshole in two?

I know, I know, we should probably focus on the question at hand. But why not have a little fun while we're at it? After all, life is too short to take everything so seriously. So let's embrace our depravity and revel in the cuckvestigation that makes us human.

[inhua]

no the principles are exactly the same. social justice facades to excuse bad behavior from supposed "victims" against perceived "oppressors" alongside political correctness and cancel culture as well as heavy reliance on big daddy government which uses fear and propaganda to put the masses under their control

the only difference between the East and West is the extent of the punishments for not complying with the woke agenda. in the West you can lose your assets, finances and freedom of speech, sometimes freedom of movement. in the East you can lose your life via death penalty plus the genocide of your family

[Sixgunsound]

Give it a few more years of Trudeau and Biden and the United Nations before conservative thought crime is punishable by genocide.

[Anonymous]

Well there's no thought behind the consequences. Decisions being made by people who don't know what they are doing in the name of political correctness.

In Mao's China it led to 35 million dead due to famine, in America its sanctuary cities overcrowding.

[Sixgunsound]

Which is having education, healthcare, housing, food and job scarcity, and inevitably criminal consequences as people are just trying to survive in a system where their lives only matter every 4th year.

[exitseven]

It is based on his principles but it encompasses more fringe groups.

[DextroShade]

No, it's just as stupid, asinine and destructive.

[Staximus]

A little different but I'm no fan of either