Working woman cries & asks why we fought for women to get jobs in the first place. what would you tell this woman in response?

Question

Working Woman Cries & Asks Why We Fought For Women To Get Jobs In The First Place — 'I'm So Tired' -  Young women are furious they were fooled into feminism -

Exterminatore · Accepted Answer

This is hilarious.

The bottom line is women fought for all the current rights and privileges they have. Some women and most men initially opposed things like women’s suffrage, and women’s rights. Eventually the male law makers capitulated on women’s suffrage and once women began to hold office and become judges they began to influence legislation for women’s rights. It wasn’t until the 60’s and second wave feminism that things really picked up steam in that area.

Let’s take a quick look at scripture to see how this happened and why we have what we now have. Understanding this is absolutely critical to understand why we have the stench from feminism and sexism against men at current time in western culture.

“To the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply Your pain in childbirth, In pain you shall deliver children; Yet your desire will be for your husband, And he shall rule over you.””
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭3‬:‭16‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

First a little background and context for that verse. This is where God pronounced judgment on Adam and Eve, and therefore every man and woman to be born as their decedents. Prior to this verse, God pronounced judgment on Adam and all men to come after. His punishment was different from that of Eve and all women. The above verse was Eve and women’s punishment for original sin.

That verse single handedly pronounced the war of the sexes and is very revealing regarding the nature of women. Let me explain. God created both sexes and designed them with different rolls in mind. The differences between the sexes go far beyond genitals and it is clear we are very different. Adam was to care for the garden of Eden. Eve, his wife was to be his helper under his lead.

Now we get to the nitty gritty. Take notice if the word desire in the above scripture. The Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew. The Hebrew word for that word desire does not translate well into English. That word in Hebrew does not mean desire as we use it in English. The meaning of the word in Hebrew carries with it a sense of rebellion. That word desire loosely translated means to “lord over.” It means the woman will seek to usurp the husbands authority and want to lord over him, and control him, and to desire his position of authority in the home granted to him by God. In other words it means she will want to run the show in the home and be in charge.

What does this have to do with the subject? This was what was behind women’s suffrage and women’s rights. They wanted to have a say. Much more than that, they actually wanted political power to not only have power and be the authority in the home, but to ensure they would never be under the authority of a husband, and to the furthest extent all men ever again. The first step was to win the right to vote. Once this was achieved it made them eligible to hold political office from local townships and judges to the presidency and the Supreme Court.

However it was not enough to merely vote and have a say. Once they began to have positions of political power, they and the feminist movement sought for more rights. Particularly in the 60’s with 2nd wave feminism. However it wasn’t about gaining rights, but rather control.

In the 60’s, feminists were complaining how horrible it was to be homemakers. That it was oppressive to women. That they could have it all. The house, car, career, kids, and the like without men. They wanted to be big ballers and shot callers. So once they established an environment that was tolerant of women’s rights, they began to change the culture into seeing women as equal to men.

But there was trouble in paradise. Once they managed to get rid of the husbands authority in the home, and sought to be the big ballers and shot callers, they needed a handicap. They know they are not as strong mentally, emotionally and physically as men and providing for themselves would be no easy task. However not content to be under a husbands authority they sought to skew laws in their favor to give them both the monitory means and privileges to never have to depend on or need a man in order to have authority themselves. This is why we have alimony. Who in 2023 can’t get a job and pay their own way in life? Why must a man continue to financially support a woman who he’s no longer married to? Then we have child support. Which is not paid to the child, but the mother who uses it at her discretion and often to support her own lifestyle, not her child’s well being. Then we have equal pay for equal work. Ha. I cannot tell you how many times when it comes to the harder physical aspects of my job I’m told by women “a man should do that.” That’s not equality. Same hiring physical for both sexes. Same pay. Same job duties. Jobs are accepted on the premise that they can be performed equally to a man. Yet, it suddenly becomes a “man’s job” when it gets difficult which is not equality. This is not uncommon in the west. Then there’s affirmative which ALL women receive. ALL women get preferential hiring treatment over ALL men in America, despite whether or not they’re better qualified then the men who compete for the same jobs. Women are not mandated to be drafted for war. That’s not equality. Women arguably receive lighter prison sentences for the same crimes as committed by men even when prior criminal record is taken into account. That’s not equality.

So women through legislation and lobbying made it so: 1. They get equal pay as a man, but will seldom be held accountable for not being able to do equal job duties. 2. Ensured if they get pregnant (even when lying about being on birth control) they will get monitory compensation. If you don’t pay your credit card do to lack of funds you won’t be jailed. If you don’t pay child support due to lack of funds you can and will be jailed and will pay fines. 3. Ensured they could leave the provider of resources aka husband by ensuring he will have to give her money and resources through alimony. What about property? Well in most states if not all all property is considered “community property” that was acquired during the marriage, to include businesses, cash, pensions, 401K stocks, bonds and all the like. In a divorce, 50% is hers by right. Well that’s a problem. If she makes less than him, she didn’t put 50% in, yet gets 50% of all that out. What if she was a homemaker? Women complain she’s entitled to compensation for her house work. Really? Did he also do no yard work or home repairs? Also how did she eat, have a roof over her head, etc? Because in such a scenario he paid for it all. So she already got her share. She did the house work and he paid all her expenses, however it will not go down like that in court.

I could go on and on, but the bottom line is women through unfair legislation ensured they would be taken care of monetarily in the event of a divorce. Money equals power. They empowered themselves to ensure they will be taken care of, even if unjust. They ensured rights to jobs over men. They ensured they may well not even have to do the difficult aspects of a job, yet still receive the same pay as a man. All of this enabled them to have self rule at the expense of men. Ultimately they have encouraged women to be men.

Now along comes this lady in the video. She must remember this is what she wanted. Even if she is not a feminist, and does not believe women are equal to men (which is not true in her case) she is not campaigning and seeking to influence legislation or become a legislator to change things. She is not influencing others to return to the way things were before the effects of feminism. Well I hope this is happy. Now she gets to work for a living. Boo hoo.

When women speak of equality, they really mean special rights, privileges, and handicaps to get around their natural deficits to enable them to be on equal footing to or better than that that of men. If they’re equal, then they don’t have to submit to their husbands as scripture commands. After all, they’re equal and have equal say. So equality really means when used by them - enabling them no matter how unfair to get what they want without having to endure equal hardship and difficulties to men to get what they want.

abc3643 · Accepted Answer

What a bunch of manosphere horseshit!

It's not that women fought to get jobs.

It's that women fought to...

1) be treated as someone who mattered

2) be treated as someone whose opinions mattered

3) be treated as someone whose needs mattered

4) be treated as someone whose issues mattered

5) no longer be property

6) no longer feel threatened or helpless and at the mercy of others - in particular, men

7) no longer feel limited

>>>> Im short, to feel every bit as important and recognized and as useful as men. That's what "equal rights" and feminism (and civil rights, overall) are about.

Take your idiotic MAGA bullshit elsewhere, boy.

Don't bother replying; I've already muted.

Ez-Bri-Z_v2 · Accepted Answer

Feminism just fought so they had a right to work. It wasn't a mandate that they had to. They can still be a tradwife if they want and they can find someone in this economy who can support them.

Or you know, she can take her whiney ass and live on the streets. Just don't blame Feminism for her laziness.

MzAsh · Accepted Answer

She’s in the wrong occupation. I’d feel that way too if I were in some shitty dead end job. Not all careers are created equal.

disgustingweebtrash · Answer

When women wanted equality they were thinking of the top men in every field. They were never thinking about normal working class men. They decided to offer their life to the capitalist system, coincidentally women make a majority of consumer spending.

inhua · Answer

same reason why feminists never fought to get rid of the military draft

MementoMori777 · Answer

Less crying more working?

Alli39 · Answer

Get a different job? It's not feminism's fault if you ended up with a bad employer or in a job you're not suited for. Part of having the ability and responsibility to work is to find work that's right for you, that goes for any gender or sex.

OddBeMe · Answer

Umm…. literal #fakenews. And no one cries like it’s cum seeping from your eyeballs.

KostasKouvalis · Answer

I mean, let's be real. I don't there's one sane person on this planet who actually WANTS to work.

DextroShade · Answer

They fought to live like men not knowing that men's lives are far harder than theirs. Feminism is a bad deal for everyone.

gorydetails · Answer

Women were sold a bill of lies.

Working woman cries & asks why we fought for women to get jobs in the first place. what would you tell this woman in response?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Why don't feminist fight for equality and female representation in low paying or grimy jobs that are predominantly male dominated?

Working woman cries & asks why we fought for women to get jobs in the first place. what would you tell this woman in response?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Why don't feminist fight for equality and female representation in low paying or grimy jobs that are predominantly male dominated?

We're glad to see you liked this post.