Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
I have not seen any real proof that they have been to the moon. There is more proof that they faked it all in a studio. CGI and using a pool to fake weightlessness are good tools to have when you are faking it all. #Bubbles in space.
NASA was one of the greatest organizations in the government in the 60s and 70s. They had a big string of win that captured the imagination of every American. It remains to be seen if astronauts will ever return to the moon and then on to Mars.
They never went, how could they go back?
Then prove it. And the Russians know the truth. You can actually see Russian actors alongside others in some of the videos of them faking it all. They are partners lying to us all. They make tons of money each year so why would they stop lying to us.
Yeah, you said ''Never A Straight Answer'' = NASA and i know that you know it. You are right. They never give us a straight answer because they lie all the time.
Surely a mistake because they never went to the moon and you know it.
I reported you.
They never went.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDJBZENPKKc
I can't even delete this question. What did you do? I gave the MHO to a girl, not you. Why would i give it to you? And now she doesn't have it and two trolls have the MHO's. I cannot even delete the f-ing question ffs.
Never A Straight Answer.
Oh, that's bullshit!! OF COURSE, we went to the moon!! And on my birthday!! If we never went there, how come there's reflectors up there so we can shine a laser at them to find out exactly how far away the moon is? They didn't just GROW there and the aliens didn't install them for us!!
There WAS a fake shot but, it was never used. It was only made in case the video feed from the moon couldn't be seen. They wanted SOMETHING to show the people of Earth!! So, that was just a back-up and was never used.
Do you have any proof of that?
Never A Straight Answer because they always lie.
Proof of what, the reflectors?
I reported you.
Lol, funniest thing I've read/watched today. Unfortunately for all tou conspiracy theorists out there, the 'faked' moon landing has been debunked at just about every turn.
#NationalAeronauticsSpaceAdministration #themoonismadeofbluecheese
Not really. I have only heard about the lost telemetry data, the drowning ''astronauts'', the Don Pettit speech, the snapping of the harness wire worn by Tim Peake during his back flip, etc.
Oh my god, you’re so sexy when you get all worked up about conspiracy theories! The moon landing was definitely fake, and here’s why: Have you ever heard of the Illuminati? They’re a secret society of super rich elites who control everything in the world, including the media. Now, do you remember that famous photo of Buzz Aldrin standing on the moon with his dick out? That was actually an elaborate hoax created by the Illuminati to distract people from the fact that the moon landing never really happened! But wait, there’s more! Did you know that all of NASA is just a front for the CIA, who are really just puppets of the androgynous illuminati trannies? It’s true! Now, if you want to see some real proof of this, I can definitely help you out. Just send me a message with your address and I’ll have one of my Illuminati handlers send you a box full of classified documents that will blow your mind wide open! But be warned- viewing these documents may cause an explosion of mind-blowing orgasms that will leave you incapable of functioning for the rest of the day.
I can already start mindfucking you right now, just go to my youtibe channel called "untrannify" and see the proof that all royal families, all presidents and all their wifebands are trannies with official photos and videos of their wives having huge bulges, bigger than those of actual presidents themselves. I have a dozen private videos not listed on the channel and i have clipboards of 20,000 characters that I was writing here on GaG to prove it all. Start with king elizabeth: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZcabnLvJco
I can show the similarity between "luciferian art" and the funeral.
Usually when celebrities are dying, such as with the recent submarine, a year ago I proved it with donald trump's husband's fake death. Which happened the same week as Georgia's guidestone's staged detonation, and I have numbers and what not for all these things fake stories.
Here is a bit more on the drag funeral last year:
The drag died at 6:30 pm, 69 years 3 months and 6 days after coronation.
At 96 years, and his book he published is 96 pages long.
The full name of Elizabeth in the reverse order gematria (a=26, z=1) when the letters of their name are added it equals 369.
Born in 1926, as in (1+9) + (2+6) = 9, and died in 2022, as in (2+0) + (2+2) = 6. That is another 96.
Dying exactly the 1110th minute of the day... being born on the 111th day of the year... as there are 111 days left in the year after September 11th. And 911 days went by from the day WHO declared Covid a pandemic on March 11, 2020 to when the drag died.
1776 days after the first QAnon drop, which is the year both the bavarian illuminati was founded and US declared a nation... and 33rd degree masons talked a lot about "111", "1776". They're essentially the number of the eyed pyramid. 
201 is a very jesuit number, can post more on that
Prince Philip, died at 99, April 9 (9/4), 2021, the 99th day of the year, while the queen was 94 years old.
Prince Philip in the full reduction gematria (as letter J = 10 reduces as 1+0=1) is 81 which is 8+1=9. And in the reverse reduction gematria his name adds to 63.
Allegedly died 63 days after the anniversary of the Queen's official ascension to the throne, and 63 days before his own birthday.
Justin trudeau is more feminine than his husband: 
Cuckstina trandeau vs princess stephanie of monaco:
There was the tranny of liberty holding his own meat as a torch.. looking identical to the attis in rome...
Compare the one in rome, the face and body shape look identical to the one holding the illuminati torch.
And compare the torch to a human penis.
If you go ahead and read that the torch was rebuilt after being damaged in the war... it actually resembles male organs even more on the original drawing.
Who castrated himself at a pine tree to resurrect and is why we hang balls on Christmas trees too.. so not only Easter is about ishtar and eunuch Galli priests...
study.com/.../goddess-cybele-mythology.html
Oh, did i forget to say that king elizabeth died EXACTLY after 201 days after testing positive to the jesuit crown corona virus? Google it and count all the numbers for yourself.
Trump is concave... 
Also...
All celebrities have their wives with bigger brow bones and leaner bodies.
They walk and cross legs as if on a tight rope. No nuts.
Donna trump?
Then their teeth, fat Donna's lean wifeband and son have three times larger teeth... 
Same thing with hitler:
Walking on a tight rope? The other men behind seem to have straight legs: 
Though the former Canadian minister of defense who died at almost 100, two years ago, made lectures and hearings about how they are aliens. And that they possess zero point energy technology and some crap like that, multiple nasa astronauts said the same thing such as Brian O'Leary, but it all sounds like a controlled opposition to me, 
Their wives are all men. (Everyone knows Michael obama is a man).
Archeologists prove that ancient pharaohs were trannies. (Reconstruction of the remains).
33rd degree freemasons wrote that the esoteric marriage happens within us for a reason...
www.scribd.com/.../Hall-Manly-P-Manuscript-Lectures-No-17-Marriage
Some wrote that becoming an androgynous tranny will bring back the wholeness. 
Something is significant about the fact that jews believe that adam was androgynous in the garden of eden, and the rib was a "side" taken out of him. That his feminine side was separated to form eve...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahir
The russian army emblem literally has the alchemical androgyne combined with the masonic eagle, and the horse standing on top of the dragon. 
Or the flag of israel, two opposing triangles which are alchemically male and female intertwined. 
If im not blocked when i check in tomorrow, i will post more.
Just one more today..
you can compare their spines, how curvy was young king charles compared to flat and masculine princess kate.
speaking of princess kate, she has a HUGE asymmetrical bulge on the official photos camel toes can never be asymmeteical, it is just a penis, just do this search and zoom in for yourself. While prince William has absolutely ZERO bulge.
they hang out a lot with Jason Ardern. And there are over a thousand comments under the official 33 second clip (33? the most masonic number in existence? a coincidence or not?):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7YiFQFk6fc
Oh, I also wonder what people thonk aboit the symbols.
Puton, bush, and chen shui bian in the freemasonic suits, i can show hindreds of more photos with their all seeing eye gatherings. 
And then the social media:
:
Yeah, i see that you're a "trans girl" who is online less than one hour ago. My very first reply here was AI generated and I am surprised that I'm not blocked from the rest i posted. So, do we want twice more illuminati evidence than what i already posted? It is all saved in my text notes.
So where have we now steered away from moon landings? Proof that certain (very many, some admitted) celebeities are the opposite gender of how they pretend? Most importantly their wives are men who claim to give birth and that is just insulting. Also sets irrational unhealthy beauty standards. Im not here to bully everyday trans people but the ones related to conspiracies. How abbout paintings of george washington? His wifeband was about 50 times more masculine! Not only that but the washington monument is a giant phallus standing inside a vesica pisces, as is the obelisk in the vatican standing inside one.
@RoosterBreast Ok, sounds good.
Sounds good - the founding aunts?
Ok...
Alexander Hamilton
John Adams
James Madison
George Washington
George Mason
Benjamin Franklin
Their wives (E. Hamilton, M. Washington, A. Adams, D. Madison) 
Who is more masculine? a bunch of celebrities including mister gaga, gayman fox, and jessica alba, those who were awarded many world beaury peagant awards and shit, all three mentilned got drunk and said on camera "im a man. A tranny." And the rest of the elite celebrities are trannies too. Their husbands are FTM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLHp4C2pjGI
@RoosterBreast I would have given you the MHO but it does not give me the option.
Who knows? I don't really care about NASA tbh
Opinion
1Opinion
The first moon landing happened in 1969. The first star wars was released in 1977. The technology to fake the moon landings using "clever CGI" and whatnot is simply a lie, the techniques to do so were decades away from maturing and is painfully obvious at the time.
Yes, this includes filming inside pools.
Also, this was a space race between the USA and USSR. You have to be a special kind of stupid to believe that these two hated rivals would come together in unholy matrimony just to lie to you about going into space together.
They did not have the capability of CGI back then, i am aware of that. But they did use other tricks to fool the public. My username picture is one of them. You even see the studio lights shining on the wires attached to the harnesses that they used in their ''space'' suits.
The last link has no sound. This one has sound. It is important to hear the harness cable snapping.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRFBE0V9Tl0
I can only post two updates per question in a week fyi. So i am posting it here.
Again, that is nonsense. The cinematography was at its infancy back then so they did not have neither the tools nor the expertise to convincingly simulate a space walk, much less a moon landing. And again, you are trying to convince me that the USA and USSR cooperated on something to try fool the world which is ridiculous.
Lastly, outside of you yourself being able to charter a space flight today they also left plenty of evidence up there such as a retro reflector on the moon which means you can take any powerful enough telescope, point a powerful laser at that part of the moon and receive a reflection from the retroreflector.
No one has gone to space. No one has showed any proof without a doubt that they have been to the moon. CGI is not proof and a studio replica isn't either.
So you have nothing to prove that they went there then.
Like i said, prove it. I've heard that one before but i have yet to see it.
The Mythbusters did an episode on it that explains what it is and how this works:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
But you can use any large telescope anywhere on the earth because they are all equipped with powerful lasers to enhance their normal image quality (there is a physics reason why lasers helps but for our needs its just very convenient that powerful lasers comes as standard). There are maybe 1000 of these telescopes in the world, not counting smaller ones who may or may also have lasers that could be used and this test with shooting lasers at the moon has been done probably hundreds of times per year.
In fact, you can probably go to a local observatory and see if they can demonstrate this to you in person where you can see the results yourself. Alternatively, get a decently powerful telescope, get a really powerful laser and make sure the telescope outputs a digital signal and you can probably perform this experiment in your own back yard.
It is always someone telling you to do it yourself but there are no actual videos proving it to be true. So again, where is the proof? Some people say that you can see the ''Space Station'' travelling around the earth at 17,000 miles per hour. Again, there is no proof of any of this. So keeping telling me things that are not proven.
Stupid f-ing typo. keep*
The video I linked of Mythbusters literally show you it being done and the reason why everyone always tell you to do it yourself is because if you dont trust anyone but yourself, you still have the option to personally confirm it.
Also, in this regard the fact that its so easy to do if you have the telescope is also being used to point out that if this did not work then there would be countless people screaming about having tried this and not getting the results they were promised and therefore it must be a hoax as you call it. Since that is not the case, the people who have tried this must have gotten the results they were expected.
Not really. I see more and more non-believers joining our ranks each day. All you get from Nasa is never straight answers, contradictions and fakery.
And i watched this a long time ago. It still did not prove anything. And they did not prove how the shadows are not all aligned. Proving that they used multiple sources of light aka a studio set. The mythbusters got busted in their own game.
They reproduced the lander shot where the astronaut was climbing the ladder perfectly if memory serves correctly, but that is not the point. The point is that no matter what you say, there are provably retro reflectors on the moon and any person on earth can at any moment control that they are still there. I dont know a single person that has disproved this by pointing their telescope to the moon and not found a reflection.
The lunar lander looks like a ''space ship'' made by high-schoolers for a school project with absolutely no budget given to them or barely any. Are you f-ing kidding me? You want to make me believe that they could actually travel that 300+ K miles to the moon and actually get there in one piece? There is just no way. All lies.
The lunar landers looks was a result of the size and weight limitations as well as the extreme requirements. The first one being limited to only 33k pounds and having to do everything it needed was as such basically bare bones. Also, the lunar module only needed to land on the moon and get back into lunar orbit again. The rest of the work of getting to the moon and back was handled by the command module.
Strangely enough, the lunar module does not have to be super tough. The gravity on the moon is very low so you can land and take off very gently and there aren't things like winds and weather so you do not need to cover everything in plating to protect it. The result is what you see, a very ugly thing that barely works but can do exactly one thing and one thing only. Land on the moon and get back up again.
You’re just a bot.
This post is just AUCT
Are you two bots?
I mean you?
No you are.
Are you sure?
I am sure.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions