Are you for 9/11 Mastermind to be tried in open court?

Question

I could care less about his rights or living arrangements. But I care what the US does in my name. And Gitmo ain't a good thing to me. Its a sanctioned concentration camp.

ObscuredBeyond · Accepted Answer

It'll be messy; but both sides need to be able to present their case.

To argue that emotional outrage over his offenses all by its lonesome warrants total dismissal of due process is a very slippery slope.

We're already seeing it; with the continued brazen disregard for the rights of US citizens accused (many falsely!) of ambiguous "offenses" related to January 6th, in a since-disproven narrative that desperately persecutes the innocent anyway, in order to gaslight its way into being accepted as truth by a public expected not to have a memory of evidence to the contrary.

We're also seeing it with regard to lawyers who came forward with hard evidence that the vote was rigged in many states in 2020. With hard proof of criminality. Lawyers who see the cases they offer to present being thrown out without a single review of evidence. Who then get put on trial in an effort to have them disbarred, simply for wanting to present a case that the corrupt sitting in bad behavior on the bench (and therefore, illegitimate!) simply refuse to even look at.

In which, if retired judges who do respect law and order make a point that the accused has a right to present evidence to their defense, the presiding judge now tells the retired judge: "That defendant has no right to present evidence in this court!"

Largely the ENTIRE POINT of a trial, is for the accused to have a chance to present evidence in said accused's defense!

So what the presiding judge is saying, is that no evidence of election tampering in 2020 is ever to be allowed to see the light of day in a courtroom. And that the lawyer who tried to present it should be disbarred...without the right to a fair hearing! Because the presiding judge said so! And that, just because the judge's bribe money is coming from those butthurt at the thought that they might have gotten caught stealing elections, that therefore, the soon-to-be-disbarred lawyer can never be allowed anything more than a show trial!

It began with Bush convincing us that being mad at the 9/11 hijackers was decent grounds not to give them due process. But now, the NWO types are tightening the noose. Now, that power they've usurped is being used to argue that what they want, they get, and you have no rights at all! Especially not the right to disagree with their narratives!

Investigator · Accepted Answer

If the 9/11 mastermind is to be given a fair trial in open court, he would have to be afforded due process and a defense attorney. Furthermore, the events of the 9/11 fall under the Intelligence Community via the PATRIOT act, because it is a matter of National Security. It is simply not in the interest of our representatives to try the 9/11 mastermind in open court, because A) it would potentially have to reveal state secrets and B) could effectively and unintentionally implicate itself in instigating the 9/11, if its hands aren't absolutely squeaky clean... and what are the odds of that?

It's practically common knowledge, at this point, that the United States' conduct over the last 100 years hasn't exactly been stellar, but I strongly doubt the populace is prepared to be made aware of the full magnitude of even a scant number of the potentially numerous atrocities and related war crimes committed by the greatest nation on Earth. Trying the 9/11 mastermind in open court, like any other criminal, could potentially open up Pandora's Box.

provokeesmokee · Accepted Answer

Bruh you'd need to jail so many American politicians and CIA folk if you really want justice for 9/11.

Americans, man. Y'all so eager to be manipulated by your gov't about your own history, you don't even know.

Should the "mastermind" be tried? Yeah of course. Is it going to be a fair and true trial? Nah. Does that really matter? Not to Americans.

Keep on with your terrorism and military complex fueled America World Police vibe, buddy. Good look.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

It's not about what people deserve... It's about what you believe in. I believe in love.  He should be treated like a human being and rehabilitated.

lightbulb27 · Answer

im on the side of yes, because what if they got the wrong guy? But if they know they got a dangerous guy with insufficient evidence, that explain why they aern't releasing...

my bigger concern is when is the new bumper crop of jihadi's going to mature and will we wake up rather than being woke, so we can possibly stop the next attempt.

jshm2 · Answer

He's probably innocent. Which is why they have illegally held him for so long without charge. Even the raid on Osama didn't give them enough evidence to link him to 9/11 or anything illegal.

In fact, Even Osama isn't linked to 9/11 and neither are the alleged "hijackers" - most of which have been proven not to be the men who they were alleged to be!

They were sort of hoping he would Epstein himself. but he's a tough bastard.

Anonymous · Answer

Gitmo can't be closed because there are too many dead bodies there. The US government can now hold anyone without charge and try them in secret courts without trial. They stopped looking terror suspects up because its more efficient, less risky to troops and more cost effective just to drop 1000llb bomb on their location.

Has anyone seem this guy lately? Probably die in his cell epstein style to stop him talking

AmeerX · Answer

We say in our country or rather culture, "if he is guilty then why is he not tried, and if he is innocent then why is he not freed". In plain words, if someone is in jail without trial, then he is probably innocent because if he were guilty they would have shown evidence and put him behind bars anyway. The judge is not his aunt.

AngryCarl2 · Answer

That would mean respecting the rule of law. Very Un-American.

Anonymous · Answer

No offence but the man in the picture dowsnt look like a man that is a threat to the U. S Government. He looks like a homeless man from a third world country.

At best, I can see him in minimum wage jobs driving a truck, farming or whatever.

BoopBoopBeep · Answer

Summary execution. He's no declared enemy combatant. Don't like the laws, update Geneva. End of the day it's the same that I'd get if captured.

ScisorsAndRaisins · Answer

Remember when Barry tried to close Gitmo and move the killers to Illinois? How did that work out? Did the hug-a-thug work out?

Jerre · Answer

I would love to see him tried in an open court. But I’m sure the Federal Government would never do that as he would surely be a target and would be killed.

exitseven · Answer

Let them stay where they are. If it goes to court some liberal judge will let them go. They really should get the death penalty.

Peter_Penetrator · Answer

Let him sit on death row. Then execute him, “Death by a Thousand Cuts”.

loveslongnails · Answer

When you're basically a financial Imperialist country feigning Democracy, on the verge of becoming Gilead, and you're run by elitist money, don't you need a sanctioned concentration camp?

SexyBrunetteNY · Answer

Let these animals face the music and the death penalty FINALLY. Long overdue.

Surely · Answer

Only if found guilty. He or they get the death sentence! Doesn’t need to be quick and painless either.

msc545 · Answer

open court means he gets a defense attorney who brings up all the torture he has gotten at Gitmo...

Anonymous · Answer

A, that isn't the guy and B, the courts are owned by the one responsible. So what would be the point in doing either?

Massageman · Answer

22 years- yeah- due process and timely delivery thereof. It will never happen.

Anonymous · Answer

We should also try Bush in open court, or throw him in gitmo as well.

zagor · Answer

I think the real originator died hitting the WTC.

CaptainSmartass · Answer

Yeah, sure. I'm just upset that the 5 million dollar prize money isn't in my bank account... Simples...

Staximus · Answer

You're dumber than I thought if you think that guy masterminded 9\11

Anonymous · Answer

Fcking stab him till be die for God's sake Why is he still alive?

Anonymous · Answer

That guy's not dead yet?

Kingofkings1992 · Answer

Put him to death.

Are you for 9/11 Mastermind to be tried in open court?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Are you for 9/11 Mastermind to be tried in open court?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.