Should staring at a woman for more than five seconds be a criminal offense?

[KrakenAttackin]

This is the "Netflix corporate rule", which states that looking at another person for more than five seconds is inappropriate and subject to discipline. Should this be a law?

YES. Staring for more than five seconds is creepy and hostile. Men should not be free to stare at women for more than five seconds.

NO. Looking at someone should not be a crime. Staring is rude but should not be criminalized.

See poll.

Updates

2 mo

At present 38% of females say "yes".

[purplepoppy]

The problem with that rule is creepy guys will aggressively stare for 4 seconds and boast it's within their rights.

Otherwise, I think anti-starting rules are a good idea. This isn't guys just looking this is perverts standing very close to girls and starting hard at them. It's deliberate sexual harassment.

[Fuentes]

You really are a SJW lol

[purplepoppy]

As a man what would you do if a guy on a train stood right up to you and stared constantly at you? Then ask what a woman's supposed to do.

[Fuentes]

That's a distance issue, not a staring issue, if someone stares at a good distance, nothing I can do about that but if you Walk up on me staring we gotta run that and he getting Parked.

[007kingifrit]

staring is a personal act and within anyone's rights, how you respond is your problem, your emotions are always your fault, good or bad.

[KrakenAttackin]

@purplepoppy. So you want a proximity and "creepy face" law as well?

[purplepoppy]

Good idea

[BoopBoopBeep]

I've had men and women do that to me on the subway. Why is it only an issue if a man does it to a woman? I've had men do that in open showers as well.

[007kingifrit]

@purplepoppy you understand if you oppress men too much they will become angry enough where they will legalize rape and conquer your body right? history is filled with examples of groups of lonely men coming together and doing this. you better learn some humanity for men

[Fuentes]

@007kingifrit I understand oppression but I don't know any men who would legalize "rape" and if they tried theirs men like me and many others who would kill any man who wanted that whether it's in prison ( which happens all the time ) or through a civil war, that will never get approved. Just like staring at someone as a rule won't, over my dead body buddy.

[007kingifrit]

@Fuentes history is filled with it it. rape is often legalized. for example in 1994 when the taliban seized control of afghanastan their big innovation was making rape illegal. in 2018 turkey narrowly failed to pass a "marry your rapist" law, the west frequently goes through phases of this and china even has a periodic event of called "revolts of the eunichs" where the men rise up.

as more and more men become isolated and depressed you won't be able to fend them off, the misfits will gather. and in the end sex is the only motivation in life.

[Fuentes]

@007kingifrit the same way liberals will be handled and the same way the North Handled the south, Bullets and more Bullets will take out and destroy the vast majority of weak men, they will be sent back to to the spirit Roulm, because they were worthless and should have never left there daddies ball sack,

in every war may have been out numbered in many battles yet, Bullets and weapons have always and always leveled the playing field. Acouple of men with pent up aggression, depression and bitch assness and can't think straight can't go agaisnt real men. They will. only fail. Western countries lead the way because of this and always have. The day any man proposes "rape" to be legal will be the day me and my buddies, lock and load we been ready to get rid of liberals and weak men and I think that'll finally be the day.

[DarkLegacy]

No it is not, we will stare where we fucking want, snowflake young women trying to dictate

[DarkLegacy]

@Fuentes She is fucking pathetic

[007kingifrit]

@Fuentes they outnumber you, they have more bullets than you, and nothing to lose

[Fuentes]

@007kingifrit lol incels don't got good aim or even know about center mass nothing. We go to a range it's all Birm with them lol I'm not worried about no life weirdos in the slightest in a any type of combat engagement. If a civil war broke out just like the weak liberals they would lose. Should have just kept there dicks in there hand.

[007kingifrit]

@Fuentes the arrogance of a man who doesn't understand the world he's entering into and tries to reason with ego based anecdotes

[purplepoppy]

People as angry as you can't be trusted with guns.

[Fuentes]

@007kingifrit theirs nothing yo be understood the minute "rape" becomes something that can be legal or looked at as ok all hell will break lose, maybe you don't have a daughter or a sister and maybe that's why something like that doesn't upset you. But those of us that do and those of that understand it will not stand for it. All incels with that mindset will lose and be sent to the tombstone or cremation factory and will be forgotten.

[007kingifrit]

@Fuentes you can't fight them, they outnumber you and have nothing to lose

[Fuentes]

@007kingifrit lol bro u don't get out much do you?

[Fuentes]

@purplepoppy thank God 2A exist

[Apple1996]

It should be. It's creepy to stare at anyone for that long unless they give you consent to. Where I'm from a person would get knocked out or shot for even daring to look in someone's direction. Looking for 5 seconds they might come after your whole damn family. I learned to keep my eyes to myself real fast

[Fuentes]

Don't move to Cali then everyone here got a staring problem haha u never know when it's fonk hahahahaa they either mad dogging or staring its weird hahaha

[Apple1996]

@Fuentes I would not handle that well. If someone is obviously staring at me then I will usually ask if they got a staring problem lol

[Apple1996]

@Fuentes I'm fine with someone looking at my body but if they look at my face too long it's fucking weird

[Fuentes]

@Apple1996 lol nah in Cali they really do that I don't know why or the stigma. U ever played GTA5 and u bump a NPC OR walk to close to one? Lol they stop and stare? At you they got that right in Cali u just walk by and people stop and state like a NPC, honestly I wonder if it's just a thing potheads do and smoked their brain cells out and don't realize they stare to long or everyone in California Is damn NPC and only the few are real lol cause sometimes it's Wild, I even mutter out "faggot" when I see people staring to long and it's a dude hahaha like wtf do I look eccentric to you or majestic like what the hell u looking at? Hahahahaha it's so weird. I even had a old neighbor who was a weirdo sit on his steps and stare at me and sometimes even smile. I think he was truly gay but he was weird and had abuncha DV issues with his wife.

[gorydetails]

That is an insane take.

[DarkLegacy]

That is dictatorship, i will stare where i fucking want. And people who shoot people for this should be put down

[Apple1996]

@DarkLegacy I recommend you don't unless you want to be labeled a creep 😂

[Apple1996]

@DarkLegacy no idea why you feel entitled to stare at people. Unless your like a cop or something there really isn't any reason to

[DarkLegacy]

I am entitled top, typical female mentality right here and it is not creepy and i do it all the time never get called a creep.

[Apple1996]

@DarkLegacy I'd be scared to call out a creep. Who knows what he would do. And nah men think this way as well

[DarkLegacy]

Just as well you would not.

[Anonymous]

uh, no. this argument is brought to you by the same people who say "my body my choice". Apparently, those people are too dumb af to understand that eyes are also part of the body. Therefore, using their own "logic", it should be our choice what we be doing with our eyes. Game over. I win. Thanks for playing.

[Lliam]

How absurd.
What if she's been gazed at and isn't even aware of it? Are there video cameras watching everyone all the time to detect what they are looking at?

If she does catch a guy staring at her, how does she prove it?

This is some dystopian shit.

[inhua]

no proof is needed. we should believe all women

[strateguy632]

@inhua yikes... that IS a problem.

[MzAsh]

No. Staring is annoying, but it’s not a crime.

[Juxtapose]

People do not have a right to have others not look at them. That is absolutely absurd.

[KrakenAttackin]

@Juxtapose. And yet you can be formally disciplined at Netflix and other major companies if you are reported for a five second+ stare. Unreal.

[Juxtapose]

That's why people need to stand up for themselves and stop taking these jobs and demand better. Society had standards at one point and red lines.

[normalice]

Obviously not a criminal offense but if a municipality considers it a civil offense then that's up to them.

[KrakenAttackin]

@normalice. So a woman should be able to sue for damages for a six second stare?

[Juxtapose]

lol the fact that you would even consider entertaining that as a legitimate civil offense is preposterous. And you call yourself a liberal?

[normalice]

I have no idea. That's up to the municipality. Suffice it to say I probably wouldn't live in such a city, if given the option.

[Juxtapose]

You should be willing to take a stand against things like this because if you don't it will spread.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I'd happily vote against it if it were on the ballot. But it's not. And it won't be. And I don't get mad at fake problems, because I am not a rage addict 🤷

[Juxtapose]

The fact that such a thing can even exist in this country is not a fake problem.

[normalice]

Although, I would like to hear about your long history of taking a stand in advocating for justice for Emmett Till. I'm sure it would fill whole novels 😅

[Juxtapose]

That's an old criminal case that there's nothing I can do about now. He's dead and whoever kills him is probably dead too long before I was born.

[Juxtapose]

*killed

[Juxtapose]

I am much more concerned about Julian Assange and other whistle blowers because that's you know.. actually relevant to the modern era.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose the lady who lied about it admitted she lied like two years ago, lol.
And there is nothing I can do about people 7 states away being fined for staring, either. Yet it's reasonable to expect me to go to the mattresses over it while I've seen nothing from you trying to stop what happened to Emmet Till from happing again.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose it is relevant to the ragetards who can't put down far right fake news, sure.

[Juxtapose]

You can't stop murder unless you have everyone live in padded cells or you mind control them.

[Juxtapose]

You argue in bad faith with all your name calling.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose that's not an excuse to let people off the hook when they do it.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose that's not what bad faith means. I'm just slightly irritated the only notifications I get on this site is ragetards wanting me to join their rage orgy.

[Juxtapose]

I am not letting anyone off the hook. I have no power over the judicial system.

Nah, you're wrong.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose you have power over everything in a democracy. But you prefer to get mad at made up stuff instead of our real history, because that would be woke or whatever.

[Juxtapose]

We live in a Democratic Republic, not a democracy.

I prefer to focus on things that are relevant to my future such as Julian Assange being prosecuted for telling the truth. I wanna get money out of politics, like how the progressive Cenk Uygur is organizing WOLF-PAC for that purpose.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose the two are not mutually exclusive.
Julian Assange being prosecuted for espionage is not relevant to your future unless you are also a Russian asset with your own disinformation action distribution business. You are, once again, imagining grievances to get mad at instead of paying attention to the ones in real life.

[Juxtapose]

So you think Julian Assange is a Russian asset?

[normalice]

@Juxtapose wait, you did t know he was?

[Juxtapose]

He never was you delusional loon

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I know I can never penetrate that thick multi trillion dollar far right rage bubble so I'll just float a question. You don't have to come up with a lie to answer me with - just think about it: if he was, how would you know?

[Juxtapose]

If the mainstream media was desperately saying he was not guilty.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I said you don't have to co e up with a lie. You're on a rage buzz so I know you can't be honest with me. But there's the slight chance you could be honest with yourself.

[Juxtapose]

I know you're just trying to go to reaction out of me and it's pretty pitiful.

I gave you the real answer. If he establishment is against somebody chances are there one of the good guys. If the establishment pimps out somebody then they are one of the bad guys.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I'd prefer you stop reacting, actually. You have no idea how meaningless this is, to me. I get that you're excited that someone is paying attention to your rage narrative on the internet, but all I'm doing is correcting you. I guess it is true that there isn't much point if you aren't going to process any of these corrections. But perhaps it would be beneficial to onlookers for them to know they aren't nuts when they consider that maybe you are are brainwashed if not intentionally gaslighting.

[Juxtapose]

This is just more of your meaningless arrogance. You are no more true than a flat earther proclaiming they are true.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I'm sorry you feel that way but it's just not my problem. You have to deal with this on your own.

[Juxtapose]

Blow it out your ass retard.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose you ragetards really are the same, eh 🤷

[Juxtapose]

Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you shitlibs.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose yes, ragetard. I was already aware of your brainwashing as I've heard it for decades. Sadly, I can't get you to understand that addiction isn't a new way to control people. You're just going to have to be useless and mad all your life, like every addict before you.

[Juxtapose]

You are more disappointing than an unsalted pretzel.

[normalice]

@Juxtapose I'm sorry if I gave you the impression that I was trying to entertain you. Sadly, I think that presumption that all information must be entertaining in order for you to process it is a huge factor in what made you a ragetard.

[Juxtapose]

May both sides of your pillow be uncomfortably warm.

[Drewtate]

Yes. A woman should also being able to not consent to sex years even decades after.

[Anonymous]

This is so dumb lol it's human instinct to look at someone when they walk into a room to make sure they don't have a gun or something. It takes me more than 5 seconds to process exactly what I'm looking at. There are a bunch of reasons someone could be looking at you for more than 5 seconds.

How am I supposed to take women seriously when THIS is all it takes for them lose their shit. I can't respect a woman as my equal if I have to treat her as if she's a child.

[DarkLegacy]

This would in fact be criminalizing medical conditions, such as Autism, Epilepsy, Dementia, Narcolepsy. This is what the feminazis want. As well as control over men. Anyone agreeing to this should be jailed

[DarkLegacy]

Does not surprise me that so many women say yes, they just want to dictate to men. I will stare all i fucking want

[AviatorTom]

If that was law, everyone would be in jail. Nothing wrong with looking at something beautiful... or unique... or odd.

[chrissykerdock]

wear a miniskirt in public most people not just guys will look so i don't see how that's even possible.

[strateguy632]

so harmless even real rude the management should say "harmless stop complaining unless a real problem".

[ShesRad80]

no, it is rude or weird sometimes but not a criminal act.

[inhua]

lmao the amount MeToo accusations will be through the roof

[Andres77]

rule of threes for me:

1 look less that 3 seconds, fine.

2nd look: double takes are ok because some people are WOW. Still less than 3 seconds.

3rd look: now ur just being creepy. knock it off and accept reality and move on.

[Tstrbrainer]

It's alright, you can do more than staring at their social media posts

[Unit1]

We're getting there slowly. Hence I plan to do it in Thailand. I heard the ladies there don't mind it. They appear to have a shortage of boys. That's where to find love.

[AngryCarl2]

Absolute bs. What if there's nothing else to look at?

[strateguy632]

bad reason. i can look at my shoes

[AngryCarl2]

@strateguy632 You can do that at home.

[Avicenna]

Leftist totalitarians would love to make that a criminal offense.

[Exterminatore]

Absolutely not. It’s frigging ludicrous for such a thing to be a crime.

[gorydetails]

Netflix is full of clowns.

[gorydetails]

Your update makes me question whether giving women the right to vote was a good idea.

[KrakenAttackin]

@gorydetails. When women lead bad things happen. Right now women are the majority of voters and look where we are. Women are easily manipulated by social media and the MSM, as a result every woke group is led by woke women.

[gorydetails]

A MAN HAS HIS EYES OPEN, LOCK HIM UP!

[Anonymous]

No. But I've told women women that have stared at me for too long before, if they keep staring at me, she better be buying me flowers at some point. That generally makes her stop.😆

[msc545]

Sure. Also, let's make trying to talk to a woman who doesn't find you attractive should be a Capital OffenseCrime.