Should Israel nuke the gaza strip and simply just start over from scratch?

[Anonymous]

Yes it's about time

No

[jshm2]

Nuke with what, exactly?

They might as well use the Samson Option on themselves and save the Arabs and Americans from dealing with them.

It's obvious that the occupying state of Israel is the problem. Who the fuck wakes up and wants to attack someone who is going to attack back the day after? There are some serious issues going on in Israel that no one is talking about. It's a danger to itself and its Arab neighbors.

[strateguy632]

israel a danger to neighbors? who invaded whose borders in 1948, 1967, 1973. just as examples.

[Dargil]

Rent some B52's and carpet bomb the bastards. Give the Gazans the choice of a one way swim in the Med or a walk into the Sinai 12 hours in advance.

[strateguy632]

i can relate to your anger.

[Dargil]

@strateguy632 I do not want to exterminate (mostly) innocent Arabs. I want to eradicate Hamas and Hezb' Allah. They know where the weapons stashes are and so does the IDF. Even the most blood thirsty terrorist has no balls when he has no weapons.

[FreyaRed]

I don't think Israeli children will be happy about evaporation of Palestinian children if Israeli kids have eat food and drink water with fallout isotopes

[chris_987]

Someone does have to wonder how you could live in a place that's an active war zone and decide to have children though. Life ain't that bad and people are deciding not to have kids because they don't want them being taught Woke nonsense

So clearly we have different ideas of hardship

[Daniela1982]

Why shoot yourself in the foot and make everything radioactive? Then nothing would be able to live there.

[chris_987]

They can use a low yield tactical nuke. The nuclear fall out wouldn't be that Pronounced

[strateguy632]

@chris_987 still it is not "precise" too broad israel has always used surgical tactical strikes. and precision guided missiles despite expensive.

[Drewtate]

You can't use nuclear weapons especially so close to your own country. You'd be irradiating your land, crops, water supply and people with radioactive dust causing radiation sickness, cancers, tumours and birth defects for generations of Israelis.

[DollarBillcheapman]

Of the 2+mil pali's, one million of them are under 15. Half that place is children. I'm all for Israel building drones and cyber pumas to take out Hamas. But man ya gotta feel for that many confused babies in one spot with explosives going off.

[RedInnocent68]

Causing overwhelming civilian casualties, and poisoning half of Israel, as well as parts of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia? That would be no. 🙄

[Asker]

the baby nuke known as the DK900 would do the job. No need for a big one.

[RedInnocent68]

So let’s say Iran does have a successful nuclear weapons program, or perhaps Iraq, which is now well within Iran’s sphere of influence? (Thanks, USA 😒) They’ve both been close before… Nuclear detente works because no one uses them. Once someone does, the risk is the end of the world.

[strateguy632]

certainly not! that would be worse than poison gas which is a war crime. too broad. also the radiation would harm the whole area.

[abc3643]

Of course not because fallout crosses borders and will generally head east... into Israel.

[WhiteSandyBeach]

No, but I don't know what should happen next. Hamas needs to be destroyed.

[goaded]

There are a million children there, you monster.

[strateguy632]

are you implying that the palestinians who raided israel towns and killed children on oct. 7 were... monsters?

[goaded]

@strateguy632 Of course they are also monsters, without a doubt, but murdering millions of innocent people in response is worse.

[jahaims]

That isn't how it works. One nuke means all the nukes. Mutual assured destruction.

[DextroShade]

Nuclear weapons are bad idea here due to fallout, they would better off using napalm, FAE bombs, and VX gas.

[AngryCarl2]

That would be like me nuking my neighbour at No.28. We'll both die so the argument will be rendered moot.

[petera1987]

No. Of course not. Are you insane? What is wrong with people these days? Has everyone gone nuts?

[strateguy632]

just the loud ones!!

[Anonymous]

Nope if it does. It would be nuked by some other country too and world war III would be started.

[Akam93]

More like every single country there is almost.

[Starrrboy]

You're so edgy.. I wish I were as cool as you lol

[Akam93]

No. Or else world War 3 would start.

[exitseven]

No, no nukes. Gotta do it the hard way.

[Blueeyes81]

They'd be nuking themselves in the process.

[msc545]

Supid idea of the month award right here!

[Anonymous]

No, they need to nuke Iran.

[petera1987]

And why is that? Iran wasn't even involved in this.

[strateguy632]

@petera1987 that you know of... but news companies already announced the connections in training instruction and supplies etc.

[petera1987]

@strateguy632 Oh wonderful, so you'd obliterate an entire nation of some 80 million people based upon a rumour. "News companies" - don't tell me. CNN? MSNBC? The ABC? BBC? Bloody hell people are insane these days!