In your honest opinion who's worse, Reaganomics or Bidenomics and why?

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Reaganomics

Bidenomics

Both equally suck

Other

[YesterdaysChild]

I don't know what Reagan did best, being an actor or being a President? Much like how was Swartzennegger? Best as an actor or best as the California Governor? Maybe which of their roles was worse is a better question. But on this one I'll lay my money on Bidenomics as being the worst of the worst.

[Cubus]

What he did best was telling jokes about Soviet Union.

[YesterdaysChild]

@Cubus Or telling people he was one of them while in a foreign country, or he went through the same thing as everyone else has, when everyone knows he hasn't.

[katiesmuff]

Both equally suck in my opinion! What is so hard about getting a government who can walk a middle line? I really doubt I will ever live to see that day, in fact I doubt it will ever happen. I do believe we are on a direct track now to be destroyed in the near future and not with nuclear weapons but by insane GREED!

[Anonymous]

You obviously missed the booming 80s, it was like the trump years for a decade, an economic miracle that largely continued until the tech boom.

Yes cutting taxes enough so there is a point in working hard and investing does in fact result in hard work and investment which then pays off.

[RealMarek]

They are both natural consequences of defaulting on the gold-backed dollar in 1971 and running an empire via the petrodollar arrangement. This cannot and will not last forever. Probably not for ten more years.

[provokeesmokee]

Reaganomics is now we ended up with every economic disadvantage today.

Reagan paved the way.

[shortster]

How can you even compare the two? They are like night and day. Reagan did everything he could to help the economy. Biden is doing everything he can to destroy it.

[Exterminatore]

Having lived through both Bidennomics is far worse.


Trickle down economics is also stupid, just not as stupid.

[Cubus]

Reaganomics actually led USA out of recession. Bidenomics didn't.

[turnpost]

I doubt anyone knows there actual facts and will just default to there biases.

[AviatorTom]

Reaganomics actually worked.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Worked well for the very rich, not so much for the working class.

Reaganomics is why the wealth gap is extremely wide between employers and employees.

[AviatorTom]

@Hispanic-Cool-Guy I respectfully disagree with you. I and my family members are middle-class working people, and we've done okay in Reaganomics and since. Many of my friends are similar.

There is a key difference between Reaganomics and Bidenomics:

In Reaganomics, the government creates an environment where the individual can succeed, and has to work for it. That's a long-term good for society and the country.

In Bidenomics, government takes care of individuals so they don't have to work for it. It's a short-term solution that garners votes (which is its main reason for existence), but in the long-term, it creates havoc in society and the country by creating a never-ending situation where government always has to bail people out, and that creates a further social divide as the wealthy pay for the bailouts.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

How does in Bidenomics does the government take care of people so they don't have to work for it?

If you are referring to welfare recipients then it's a very tiny percentage of the U. S. population and most people actually need it like poor single moms raising kids and poor old people.

Reaganomics largely favored the ruling elites over the common man and woman.

[Exterminatore]

@aviator

You may have a point. I do not remember major economic upheaval in the 80’s. I damn sure don’t remember societal upheaval either. Everything was normal and sane back then.

[Anonymous]

Reagan loved America and Biden loves China.