Why do you think no fuss?

[strateguy632]

1, a sample study of "fatalities due to cops" total 812 deaths, in 4 years, spread over 17 states, found "Victims were majority white (52%)" surprised?

2, we never hear about those... neither if cop same race nor black cop.

3, did white ever die? yes, and many, and most, 52% over 400 FOUR HUNDRED deaths but nobody makes a fuss about these HUNDREDS killed before a fair trial.

4, it seems like white lives don't matter?

5, these deaths don't fit the agenda?

note: all fatalities were fatal... no one group "higher rate fatal" because it studied fatalities.

[SotiCoto]

Because a lot of people "default" to white. By which I mean they don't bother noting whiteness when it happens because they assume that to be the state unless otherwise specified.

It is probably the "systemic racism" the left-wing folks talk about. I just see it as perspective bias, personally.

[strateguy632]

noting whiteness? when did they ever report someone died by cops, without saying color... only report if black?

[Likes2drive]

Doesn’t surprise me , I knew it was pretty much like that, they don’t make a big deal of it when it is a white person because they just figure he was a criminal anyway but if they are black then it was a racial thing

[strateguy632]

which is a baseless assumption and accusation of unknown motives! suggested by the news companies.

[Likes2drive]

Yeah the media loves that

[Date_a_Snob]

years ago I went on a citizen ride along and 9/10 people the cops pulled over were black. They were also the ones breaking the law. Racist? No. The cops ticket and arrest those people caught breaking the law whether they are white, black or brown.

[strateguy632]

you broke the assumed "link lie". if a white cop killed a black suspect they "assume the motive" which is baselessly!
the cop action was not caused by color but caused by resisted arrest same as when whites resisted arrest.

[Yabbut]

It doesn't fit the narrative.