







This succubus has not been to ALL schools.
It's perhaps correct in regions where you begin a school day with a nationalistic singsong or recite a platch (sic!) that glorifies your submission to 'the System'; or where wearing uniforms is unquestioned.
However: my own school encouraged us for critical thinking and civilized protest if that's needed.
True: schools are embedded in 'the System' - and so they as well need to obey certain "rules", which makes them a two-sided knife.
In some ways…in other ways: standardized educated statistics show the school systems are doing a pretty damn good job considering their attackers.
No, the classical left wing has always been against the establishment and they have rebelled against how schools have been teaching the youth to obey "the man." Do not remember the hippie movement? What about liberal counterculture? Really?
It's thanks to the liberals that what was previously accepted as acceptable working conditions is now not. It's thanks to them that religion was taken out of school.
Or do you think liberals are supposed to be good little boys and girls who listen to the D. A. R. E program and don't laugh about it afterwards?
I keep telling you and that other fuck nightdrop or whatever. I don’t give a shit about old labels. I just describe current politics as they are.
No current politician knows or even cares what classical Edmund Burke or Ralph Waldo Emerson liberalism or conservatism is. They go by how much of the stupid vote they can get.
It also needs to be relevant. And you learned from him that shoving stupid labels into arguments makes you look smarter. But it’s a complete DODGE.
you're actually committing a logical fallacy thinking your old labels have anything to do with today. Unless we were talking about the evolution of political parties. Which you still don’t get…lol
The great switch is a lie but I don't want to get into a tangent about that because it's off topic.
Classical liberalism is very much so relevant and it has a clear, understood meeting. You can't just keep changing the definition of a word and expect it to remain coherent and meaningful.
"Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law."
Anything that involves individualistic rights and consent of the governed is going to have a lot of grievance with an authoritarian government and culture. How is that a surprise to anyone that liberalism is going to be anti-establishment?
I thing in your definition (which I agree with) is anti establishment. Thts you saddling your own bullshit.
Today’s Republican Party are more akin to anarchy and antiestablishment. Trump is nothing but anti establishment. At least establishments he doesn’t like.
He skeletonized the govt during his tenure- either by design or laziness. Thats how Covid slipped in.
Trump is not really anti-establishment, he wants to empower the police against criminal liability when if anything they should be more open to liability. He wants to severely punish drug dealers, etc. the guy is not some anti-establishment hippie, he just doesn't like woke bullshit and is willing to cut that out of the government. Do you really think he's going to start cutting down the military?
The government is way too bloated and spends trillions on utter nonsense.
Well you once read bullshit then. Words have clear definitions and muddling those definitions attacks the fabric of human communication itself.
Bernie was as close to liberal as you could get before he was forced to bend the knee to Hillary. He's a bit more Marxist than your typical liberal should be but better than that fake ass Obama.
I’m not trying to redefine ironically. The definition you gave above I 100% agree with. It’s the shit after I have a problem with. See you’re adding your keywords or ideas. Stick to the exact definition and we’ll be fine.
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.
Huh…”before the law”. Thts pretty pro establishment.
The establishment is chaos because by it's very nature organizations become corrupt and slowly crawl towards anarcho tyranny that will lead to a dystopian hellhole. Liberals and other anti-establishment people serve an important function in that they are supposed to check that slow crawl towards dystopian destruction by giving power back to the people.
Opinion
4Opinion
in that world yes
in my scool everything was opposite from that:
not prison we walked off campus for lunch break. didn't you?
not enslaved we could play in the gym at breaks. but i was the only one in the empty gym! but others could.
not "staring" glaze eyes, nor a "superior" just another human. not a "super boring way" teachers paced the room and involved the students.
classes were about useful foundations for future options... not "nobody cared about" but i admit much was "dry" and most kids were too lazy to care.
school was NEVER about "authority" it was about remembering stuff for tests. that vast range of topics gives future options for various college courses in many possible fields.
we even learnt that the alternative to scool used to be child labor at factories! so sitting in a classroom is better.
It's a joke game, dummy.
Spot on.
Could be.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!