The original meaning came from blacks that wanted people to wake up. That's now not even close to the new meaning of woke. Woke is now 100% Marxism.
And in the beginning, BLM was about police brutality towards blacks. But they became a Marxist group of thugs that caused plenty of insurrections, and the left cheered them on.
"The movement began in July 2013, with the use of the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of African American teen Trayvon Martin 17 months earlier in February 2012." "The trio started the Black Lives Matter movement in the US in 2013 after the not guilty verdict against George Zimmerman, who shot dead unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin." "Martin’s death and Zimmerman’s acquittal sparked the formation of a number of new racial justice organizations, including the Black Lives Matter network, Dream Defenders and Black Youth Project 100, and many of the groups eventually joined the Movement for Black Lives, an umbrella coalition." Maybe you should follow your own advice.
Rubin mentioned him as someone who does a good job of explaining something and you go on some tangent about him not being a doctor or whatever. What's next? You're going to tell me PragerU isn't an actually a university? Who would have fucking thought? What a stupid digression lol.
Do not understand what it means to infantilize people?
If it means libtards sometimes going overboard to protect other people’s rights…sure. But I’ll take that rather than having a racist scandal every other week.
Just look up GOP rep attends white nationalist rally.
Yes, they do. Any group that thinks you are too stupid to get an ID yourself isn't looking out for you.
Voter fraud is rampant and numerous dead people have been caught trying to vote. Our elections should be at least as secure as France's, they have some sensible restrictions in place.
Anyone who is against voter ID is looking to cheat.
That is false as even left-leaning sources say there is at least some voter fraud.
And did it not occur to you that districts inflate their population by counting criminal aliens amongst their population? The illegals don't even have to vote to affect our elections.
You've done nothing when you've bested a liberal. They do not have control of their minds. Either brainwashing, programmable sub conscience or willing idiot. 😎
All you would have to open and free your mind, think actually and stop, look and listen to the coverage going on at 5am to 545 am and watch buden gain the lead over Trump by getting over a 120,000 votes while Trump received 0. But maybe you think that is possible. Biased is a strong drug.
The reality though is that with so many voters without IDs and with voting watch dogs being kicked out of stations at critical times, it's pretty obvious.
Voter fraud is rampant. Same day voting, paper ballot only, watch dogs can never be kicked out even if pipes burst, ID required, etc.
The Democrats stole that shit 100%. You want to tell me that Biden got more black votes than Obama when he couldn't even draw a crowd? Give me a fucking break dude.
The only ones engaging in illegal election interference are the democrats. Not only did they cheat, but they are actively prosecuting their prime political opponent Banana Republic style.
"Unfortunately for Greenwald, his enemies regard him as a traitor. Which raises the question, should he be prosecuted?
The short answer is no, providing he hasn’t published anything that actually jeopardizes national security. Snowden is more problematic, but the same logic applies. Snowden’s revelations and Greenwald’s reporting have spurred significant changes both in public opinion and government policy."
Sure and I agree. But don’t take everything they say as gospel. That was the fckin point of the article. He did good work, got the Pulitzer. He’s jaded and a commentator now instead of unbiased journalist.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
2Opinion
The original meaning came from blacks that wanted people to wake up. That's now not even close to the new meaning of woke. Woke is now 100% Marxism.
And in the beginning, BLM was about police brutality towards blacks. But they became a Marxist group of thugs that caused plenty of insurrections, and the left cheered them on.
BLM had its origins in Florida when a dude defended himself from a young black guy and people got pissed.
@Jennifer604
No, but Okay. Google it.
"The movement began in July 2013, with the use of the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of African American teen Trayvon Martin 17 months earlier in February 2012."
"The trio started the Black Lives Matter movement in the US in 2013 after the not guilty verdict against George Zimmerman, who shot dead unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin."
"Martin’s death and Zimmerman’s acquittal sparked the formation of a number of new racial justice organizations, including the Black Lives Matter network, Dream Defenders and Black Youth Project 100, and many of the groups eventually joined the Movement for Black Lives, an umbrella coalition."
Maybe you should follow your own advice.
One of BLM's founders literally calls herself & co-founders: "trained Marxists."
No. Woke is just being polite.
And him referencing “Dr” Phil makes this even funnier.
Quite the opposite of being polite actually.
Well we all have different perspectives. Whats impolite about woke to you? Not Ruben or “Dr” Phil…. you
The language policing and how they try to infantilize people with disabilities.
The video doesn't even mentioned Phil either lol.
Also woke people infantilize black people and say they are too stupid to get identification.
Your video above does reference Phil dumbass. And what does infantilize black people mean?
Exactly
Rubin mentioned him as someone who does a good job of explaining something and you go on some tangent about him not being a doctor or whatever. What's next? You're going to tell me PragerU isn't an actually a university? Who would have fucking thought? What a stupid digression lol.
Do not understand what it means to infantilize people?
*an actual university
If it means libtards sometimes going overboard to protect other people’s rights…sure. But I’ll take that rather than having a racist scandal every other week.
Just look up GOP rep attends white nationalist rally.
Treating black people like retards leads them to think of you like this:
…. checking…nope we don’t do that.
Demanding voter ID when election fraud is nil.. now that’s gangster politics.
Yes, they do. Any group that thinks you are too stupid to get an ID yourself isn't looking out for you.
Voter fraud is rampant and numerous dead people have been caught trying to vote. Our elections should be at least as secure as France's, they have some sensible restrictions in place.
Anyone who is against voter ID is looking to cheat.
It’s not “too stupid”…it’s “got too much shit to do” based on no actual crimes being committed.
Like I said, anyone who is against voter ID is looking to cheat.
Yet there’s NO voter fraud. Interesting.
That is false as even left-leaning sources say there is at least some voter fraud.
And did it not occur to you that districts inflate their population by counting criminal aliens amongst their population? The illegals don't even have to vote to affect our elections.
Please provide proof of that bullshit claim. The ONLY fraud came from right wing aholes wanting to prove voter fraud occurs.
You've done nothing when you've bested a liberal. They do not have control of their minds. Either brainwashing, programmable sub conscience or willing idiot. 😎
@Dongie I’m still waiting for proof of voter fraud.
www.justice.gov/.../woman-convicted-voter-fraud-scheme
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
calmatters.org/explainers/california-voter-fraud/
Ouch…nice try tho.
www.brookings.edu/.../
You posted a single biased source. Congratulations?
There's a lot of obfuscation surrounding this and without voter id, paper ballots and same day elections? It's going to continue to be obfuscated.
Well actually you can't blame the dirty cheaters Jux, hell Trump would get 80% of the votes legally cast.
All you would have to open and free your mind, think actually and stop, look and listen to the coverage going on at 5am to 545 am and watch buden gain the lead over Trump by getting over a 120,000 votes while Trump received 0. But maybe you think that is possible. Biased is a strong drug.
There’s no voter fraud. You had an entire year of biased audits and found zilch.
You should say there is little voter fraud because saying there's absolutely no voter fraud is demonstrably false.
Sure. there's outliers caught by the justice system. Nothing nearly worth fucking voter id.
The reality though is that with so many voters without IDs and with voting watch dogs being kicked out of stations at critical times, it's pretty obvious.
Voter fraud is rampant. Same day voting, paper ballot only, watch dogs can never be kicked out even if pipes burst, ID required, etc.
But there’s not. Do you not recognize a whole political party trying to INVALIDATE the 2020 election and the COULDNT.
The Democrats stole that shit 100%. You want to tell me that Biden got more black votes than Obama when he couldn't even draw a crowd? Give me a fucking break dude.
The only ones engaging in illegal election interference are the democrats. Not only did they cheat, but they are actively prosecuting their prime political opponent Banana Republic style.
Then show the PROOF
www.cachevalleydaily.com/.../...-a75505b22dcb.html
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
https://youtu.be/BSBOEX4IMk4?si=naeGQItbxj_Kndkv
https://youtu.be/RWmLqH_78E0?si=spSVVn8jBbYrDXVA
Omg…you claim I have biased links…. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2f3aw9rk30
I don't care about a single witness 🤷
The only super biased link I posted was the heritage foundation one.
Polite to lefties. Rude, assaulting and constantly trying to force their will upon the same people who are just living peaceful lives.
@Dongie which links am I allowed to post? Snopes is biased…WaPo? NYT?
Try Glenn Greenwald or others like him.
Jesus Christ, branch out. You’re getting your news from idiot YouTubers and one debunked journalist who made a fool of himself.
Gotta read multiple sources and do your homework.
Excuse me but Glenn Greenwald is an award-winning journalist lol. Much better than your Don Lemon or Wolf Blitzer xD
It's like you hate all independent news media and you only follow media created by the establishment and what the establishment approves of.
We’ve discussed this before. He’s been shown to have gone off the deep end. But being an enemy of the state can do that.
Still…seek out different sources of news. Please.
How is he so?
What? CNN? MSNBC? CBS? NPR?
Liars. Yes, Fox too.
He’s become a commentator. And we’ve discussed commentators. All I’m saying is msnbc and fox appear to agree in something, pretty sure that’s true.
Here’s an interesting piece on him. Again he’s earned his right commentate. But he’s not a journalist anymore.
www.cjr.org/.../glenn_greenwald_against_the_wo.php
From your source:
"Unfortunately for Greenwald, his enemies regard him as a traitor. Which raises the question, should he be prosecuted?
The short answer is no, providing he hasn’t published anything that actually jeopardizes national security. Snowden is more problematic, but the same logic applies. Snowden’s revelations and Greenwald’s reporting have spurred significant changes both in public opinion and government policy."
They're heroes to me.
Sure and I agree. But don’t take everything they say as gospel. That was the fckin point of the article. He did good work, got the Pulitzer. He’s jaded and a commentator now instead of unbiased journalist.
You right wingers have a tendency to idolize. Please change that.
I ain't right wing, I fit the definition of a classical liberal.
Glenn isn't right wing either lol.
I trust them hundredt of times more than corporate media.
*hundreds
I reject the term you use to describe yourself.
You are a trans-political right winger
It's okay, you're allowed to be wrong.
And you’re allowed to call yourself whatever the hell you want.
Its one definition of the word.