Should vaccine manufacturers be indemnified from lawsuits?

[Anonymous]

Vaccines were invented in 1796 but because they killed people companies would not make them. Then in 1986 governments around the world decided to indemnify them from lawsuits. So if they killed people it would not matter because then we would all be vaccinated. If they were not indemnified they would not be on the market. Should the companies be held accountable. They pay out 200 million a yeah in the USA alone. Tax payers money as companies are indemnified. In the USA it's $5,232,724,081.27 at the time of writing this.

Compensation in the USA to date

Irish Narcolepsy lawsuits at the taxpayer expense

[Anonymous]

You have to understand how this system works and how many people have money in it.


The health care system basically runs the country in the USA. They don't answer to anyone, and when they do it's a stage show wrist slapping act. It's why everything negative about medications disappears and or its never made public.


People who post their stories online about a drugs serious side effects literally get paid to remove them by the companies that produce the drugs. If you don't they go to the site hosts and have them removed.


When a drugs name is too tarnished they change the name. Same drug different package. Same results. Nobody stops a system like that. A system with that much money.

[Asker]

yes but vaccines are protected. They should not be.

[Opinion Owner]

Nothing should be.

[Asker]

EU politicians are and so are US troops.

[Opinion Owner]

You'll never have full disclosure.

[gorydetails]

They should not.