
In North Dakota, HB 1406 proposes preventing state agencies from requiring vaccines “unless the manufacturer of the medical product is liable for any death or serious injury caused by the medical product.”

In North Dakota, HB 1406 proposes preventing state agencies from requiring vaccines “unless the manufacturer of the medical product is liable for any death or serious injury caused by the medical product.”
No, that would be a violation of a shitload of Constitutional rights.
Here's an example:
As a kid, you were likely required to get vaccinated for several diseases before you could attend public school. Your parents could refuse to get you vaccinated, but the school is within its rights not to admit you until you are vaccinated. No one is going to drag you out of your home to get vaccinated.
In other words, you have the right to refuse, but they have the right to deny.
And that's as it should be.
@laserlip Not exactly.
You get a vaccine to mitigate the effects of getting the disease. You still have the pathogen that causes the disease and can transmit it to others.
Here's an example.
Do you know what AIDS is? Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
It's a highly lethal disease caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) which is sexually transmitted. Someone who has this virus is "HIV-positive"
Now, suppose there's an AIDS vaccine.
You see a really hot girl and want to have sex with her.
She's infected with HIV, but she's taken the AIDS vaccine so she'll be OK and won't die from AIDS.
You're unvaccinated because you refused to take the AIDS vaccine.
Do you have sex with her?
Should she have sex with anyone who is unvaccinated with the AIDS vaccine?
Do you have sex with her?
So, do you get it now?
What happens to you does not depend on whether or not she is vaccinated.
It depends on who she has sex with and whether or not that person is unvaccinated.
Back to the real world, there is no AIDS vaccine (yet), so if you have sex with someone who is HIV-positive, you are taking your life into your hands because, if you get infected, there is a good chance you will die. Let's ask my aunt about that... oh... we can't... She died in April 2000 from AIDS after having had sex with my uncle who was HIV-positive and also died from AIDS a few years earlier.
Anyway, do you understand? Those who are unvaccinated are at risk from those who are infected - whether or not the infected person is vaccinated. The pathogen may not harm the vaccinated person, but the vaccinated person still has the pathogen and can give it to someone who is unvaccinated.
I did a lousy job of explaining this.
In short, when a child who is unvaccinated is prevented from attending school, it is primarily not for the sake of the vaccinated children who are attending. It is for the sake of the unvaccinated child. This is because the vaccinated children, while safe, may still be pathogen carriers and thus could transmit the pathogen to the unvaccinated child.
Many places where people congregate, like schools or churches, are places where infectious diseases are often transmitted between people. A good example is chicken pox which kids usually get earlier in life from their infected siblings or from the other kids at school. For example, I got chicken pox in the 1st grade in 1970 (as did a lot of my classmates) and my sister, who was 3, got it from me.
The jabs aren't vaccines. Have you been living under a rock, abc3643? They don't cure anything! They mask the symptoms of you getting it, and make you insensitive to the infection. They destroy your immune system, and fill your blood with unnatural chains that your DNA is altered to make!
Thousands of children have fallen face first onto the ground, twitching in pain , dying right in front of horrified classmates! Several new cancers have been found to be caused by this mRNA gene "therapy", with the jab heart and center of the cancer!
It's currently killing my grandpa as we speak, so your "Typhoid Mary" ballyhoo is dead to rights! Your smug self righteousness is lynchpinned on damned lies of the hottest pits of the Lake of Fire!
And if you don't turn from that attitude, all the screams of all those horrified children will be added to the list of your transgressions, for which you will stand defenseless in the court of the eternal, before a judge that will have no pity on you whatsoever!
COVID is a fine vaccine. It works which is why we are not under mask mandates anymore.
I had the Pfizer vaccine which is the one I'd want because it is a messenger RNA vaccine. mRNA vaccines are common now with many vaccines for all types of diseases and illnesses being mRNA vaccines.
Per the CDC:
www.cdc.gov/.../how-they-work.html
mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna)
To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. This immune response, which produces antibodies, is what helps protect us from getting sick from that germ in the future.
(more)
And, from the journal Signaled Transduction and Targeted Therapy...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940982/#
TITLE: Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7: 94.
Published online 2022 Mar 23.
Abstract
To date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has determined 399,600,607 cases and 5,757,562 deaths worldwide. COVID-19 is a serious threat to human health globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared COVID-19 pandemic a major public health emergency. Vaccination is the most effective and economical intervention for controlling the spread of epidemics, and consequently saving lives and protecting the health of the population. Various techniques have been employed in the development of COVID-19 vaccines. Among these, the COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine has been drawing increasing attention owing to its great application prospects and advantages, which include short development cycle, easy industrialization, simple production process, flexibility to respond to new variants, and the capacity to induce better immune response. This review summarizes current knowledge on the structural characteristics, antigen design strategies, delivery systems, industrialization potential, quality control, latest clinical trials and real-world data of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as well as mRNA technology. Current challenges and future directions in the development of preventive mRNA vaccines for major infectious diseases are also discussed.
The idea of the Founding Fathers was to have a government as small as possible, to accomplish those goals which could only be handled by a centralized government. They did NOT want a government as large as possible, intruding in our personal lives and depriving us of our liberties.
They were right!
Nope. I recognize nobodies authority over my body. Especially not the government.
I 100% agree. My payment of taxes is a bribe to the government to leave me the fuck alone. 😂
The government is going to be sued into oblivion over the vaccine mandates.
Yes they can. A government hospital had to pay out a pretty penny for firing employees who refused the experimental jab. Just wait until the tens of thousands of military people that Jo Jo the clown fired, because they refused the experimental jab.
Watch this video and tell me if you think Biden got the jab.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuSoigCk5QQ
Opinion
8Opinion
That's the way it usually works... the supplier is liable for any damage its product may cause. For COVID, to encourage rapid vaccine development, the US Federal Government granted unqualified immunity to the drug manufacturers, which sets a very dangerous precedent. North Dakota's bill tries to change that, and I'm all for it.
No, any product’s manufacturer should be always be legally liable for the effects of there products, irrespective of what that product is it would be like motor manufacturers being immune from any liability due to the failure of their products.
I think people should be able to choose. The reason their not liable is because everyone of the companies threatened to quit making vaccines if they were held liable.
It will still be ok to force people to take an ineffective vaccine with side effects more serious than the malady then?
Nope, no one's immune to propaganda but sometimes they make it too obvious
If it isn't in the Constitution, no. And it isn't.
Nope, it is a violation of the Nuremberg Codes.
Absolutely not.
Damn are you really 14 years of age!
Nope
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions