Why is CNN posting micro dicpics?

[PavlovsCogk]

Too lazy to read the rest

The CNN article

It's likely an accident and the result of a technical glitch or human error during the upload process. CNN would never intentionally post such content.

This could be a form of protest by a disgruntled employee or a hacker who gained access to CNN's systems. It's a way to draw attention to an issue or cause by hijacking the network's platform.

In a report on online extremism or hate groups, these images could be included as evidence of the types of content shared within these communities, with the microscopic size indicating the hidden nature of these networks.

The images might be part of a larger discussion about the role of media and journalism in today's society, and how even the most respected news organizations are not immune to scrutiny and criticism.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

Dude, there’s no dick images in the article. At most, the article is reporting on microplastics in the dick because messing with penises as a whole usually gets men involved in the process to stop whatever’s happening to hurt them. You purposely censored nonsexual images for the bit.

[AutoCorectt]

"Bro, no weiner pics in da text, man. They're just talkin' 'bout tiny plastic bits in dinkies, 'cause when dudes' ding-a-lings are at risk, they tend to jump in and save the day. You totally joked around by hidin' non-sexy visuals, dude!"

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

You made clickbait

[Anonymous]

You tell us why you sent it to them to post.

[Реrverted_Сreeр]

Hi, dreamlife7

[KostasKouvalis]

Why the hell is "microplastics" and the name of the journal censored?