Is it acceptable that candidates scrub their website/biography if circumstances change political calculations? Is it dishonest? Fraud? Good politics?

[DrPepper12]

GOP VP candidate JD Vance just eliminated this page on his website. What do you think about it?

Both parties are calculating scum so yeah

The FEC should monitor & approve proposed changes

Its the GOP so of course they did

[bobby_bush_eater]

He's a politician it doesn't matter how he once viewed things. He has a shot at VP so she'll stfu and do as he's told just like the current useless VP. It's a guaranteed way to have a shot at President if you're the VP of a popular one.

Didn't Obama oppose gay marriage in 2008? Where's your outage there?

Didn't Biden say mixing white and black kids in school would create a racial jungle? Where's the outage?

Everyone just picks and chooses what they think is wrong politically when in reality they're almost all corrupt. The fact that Trump was already rich is a reason why a lot of Americans originally trusted him

[Juxtapose]

^^ this.

[DrPepper12]

Now do it again without whataboutism.

I'd happily discuss your questions when you post them

[exitseven]

The way to see what kind of man JD Vance is , is to ask him what his standing on abortion is. If he waffles on the question he lacks integrity.

[DrPepper12]

I support this!!! 👊🏻

[exitseven]

Ask a democrat if they support abortion up to the dare of birth and see what they say. I bet they change the subject.

[DrPepper12]

I do for the.1% of cases that require it for life of mother or palliative care for dying fetus.

[exitseven]

Okay. There are always exceptions but they want to br able to do it as a form of birth control.

[DrPepper12]

Where do you get this malarkey from? NO ONE wants to use abortion as a form of birth control! Not one single woman! Think about what you're saying!! They would rather have a D&C then use some form of protection? JFC i like you and respect your opinions but this is BATSHIT crazy.

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[MzAsh]

It depends. They should have it called out and asked for what their reasoning for removing it is. If really love to hear his answer.

[DrPepper12]

I think their reply will resemble something that Charlie Brown's teacher would say...

[Caroline91]

It isn't okay but that doesn't mean they aren't going to do it. People need to do their own due diligence.

[Alli112]

It definitely becomes frustrating when you're trying to understand where a candidate actually stands, but also I see why they do it. I don't like it. But I see why. (I'm sure you can always find the info through other sources if need be, it's just more work)

[dustybiker2]

Must have burned him up to have to delete something he seems so ignorantly adamantly about. Fits the mold though. He has a lot in his past to hide from Trumpet too..

[hahahmm]

Oh, wait, you think there is a contest with the election? Democrats fiddled around for years with a President they should have removed from office. They F'd around & now they're about to find out. It's a done deal.

[DrPepper12]

Great cogent pounts about the question i asked!

Can you MAGAs have ANY discussion without resorting to whataboutism?

[hahahmm]

Whenever I see a poor question I give a response that adds some useful information/context. it's how I achieved 45% MHO despite never caring at all about the feelings of the person asking the question. Sure there are people with higher MHO tho.