Why do pro choicers wrongly think that it's great to treat EVERYONE of a particular group horribly because most of that group are bad people?

This was the dumbest analogy I have ever seen: >>If you're sexually assaulted by 90 men out of a hundred at random, would you take a chance a random 10 would be ok? No<<

For example. I guess since most Germans during a specific time were fans of that mustache man, it would have been okay to wipe them ALL off the face of the earth.

IF trump wins the popular vote? (he won't, but its called a hypothetical) What then? Let Putin genocide the entire united states?
I guess we must, i mean you wouldn't want to take a chance. Also, in that example i guess it would be okay to murder those 10 random men. wouldn't want to take that chance!

Why do pro choicers wrongly think that it's great to treat EVERYONE of a particular group horribly because most of that group are bad people?
Post Opinion