What happened to the "election fraud"?

[msc545]

If Democrats cheated in the 2020 Presidential election as MAGA claims, why didn't they cheat in the 2024 one?

Or does this demonstrate that MAGA just simple lied about 2020 cheating?

Updates

1 y

The controtions of MAGA to normalize this shit are really something to behold. Is there ANYTHING you people refuse to excuse?

[goaded]

Everything proves they were simply lying. From registering http://stopthesteal.org in 2016 to not saying a word about senate elections they won in states Trump lost. It's so bloody obvious, but there's billions being spent on making sure people don't hear about it or believe it if they do.

Musk just got a massive RoI on Twitter; control of the federal government.

[exitseven]

Everyone assumed that the democrats would get illegal aliens to vote. They spent the last 3 1/2 years getting the machine set up. The RNC was very proactive and watched the action in targeted states that could be flipped with a few thousand illegal alien votes. They filed lawsuits every time an irregularity turned up. They got the Supreme Court to reverse the decision in Virginia to force the governor to put the illegal aliens he cleared from the voting rolls back on. With this precedent and all the publicity that went with it, the democrats knew that they would not be able to pull it off.

Also Trump was so far ahead, even if they were able to produce as many fake mail in ballots as they did in 2020 there is no way that they would catch up to Trump.

[DryGermanGuy]

Yet again, in four years of litigation about election fraud in 2020, the only people indicted and convicted are Republicans. Go figure.

[exitseven]

@DryGermanGuy in a crooked DOJ what would you expect Yet the FBI is still finding Jan6th protesters

[DryGermanGuy]

That’s the same „crooked“ DOJ that indicted/convicted Michael Madigan, Andrew Gillum, Henry Cuellar, John TJ Cox, Bob Menendez, Hunter Biden and Eric Adams, right? 🙄🙄🙄

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy You recognize that two things can be true at once, right?

[DryGermanGuy]

Yes! That car is yellow. No, it's green, but maybe I think it is yellow. Totally normal.

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy In this case you can have a corrupt FBI that also still prosecutes people legitimate criminals. The fact they use their powers for good sometimes wouldn't negate the fact they're also harming people.

[DryGermanGuy]

The prosecution is done in court, by independent judges, not by the FBI or police. These can be as corrupt as they want to be, if they bring a nonsense case to a judge, he or she will throw it out. Ask Giuliani, Chesebro, Powell or any of Trump's crackpot lawyers.

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy That is NOT how prosecution is done in the US, actually. Prosecution is done by Prosecutors. And judges absolutely do not have discretion to dismiss any case they please.

[DryGermanGuy]

I did not say, judges can dismiss any case as they please, I said a judge has to request certain judicial standards. And if the prosecution can't meet that standard, the judge has the power to throw it out. As history has shown us many times.

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy I would strongly encourage you to study the way the US judicial system actually works. You'll find it very instructive.

[goaded]

@ProbablyClueless Let me guess, it's flawless unless it's indicting or convicting Trump.

[DryGermanGuy]

@ProbablyClueless
I don't have the time for every detail. I am mostly interested in the end results.

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy Then actually read those end results.

@goaded no one is above the law!

[DryGermanGuy]

@ProbablyClueless
I did. The DoJ does not conduct any "lawfare", Trump and his kooks and enablers are targets of the justice system rightfully so and lost their faked 63 lawsuits rightfully so, because there was no widespread voter fraud. End of story.

[ProbablyClueless]

@DryGermanGuy Well, at least you're honest; you definitely don't bother to read details!

[goaded]

@ProbablyClueless What's the current status of Trump lawyers Guilani, Eastman, Chesebro, Powell, Clarke, Ellis, Bobb? Disgraced, disbarred, indicted, or convicted, the lot of them.

This DoJ doesn't conduct "lawfare", the next one probably will, and Trump is breaking laws before he's even sworn in.

[ProbablyClueless]

@goaded Oh shut up. You know good and well that none of those cases would have ever gone to trial if they weren't attempts to smear right wing people. The Biden DOJ was lawfare's poster child. You don't get to treat people badly and then bitch when they return the favor; not that they will anyway, because they aren't you.

[goaded]

@ProbablyClueless Give me a break. The only people pushing for delay, delay, delay were Trump's lawyers, because they knew he didn't have a leg to stand on, in any of the cases.

There's a law that sets out how presidential transitions have to go. Trump's not following that law. "Mr. Trump’s transition team was required to submit the ethics plan by Oct. 1, according to the Presidential Transition Act." Still not done.

[Anonymous]

Yep, it's just like when Hunter Biden was found guilty and their illusion about the entire legal system being fixed against Trump was destroyed. The lies Trump makes up are easily seen by people who aren't in a cult.

[Anonymous]

In 2020 they did just enough to win. In 2024 they didn't do enough and theh never imagined so many women, Hispanics, Muslims and black men would vote for Trump.

[MzAsh]

It’s only fraud when he doesn’t win 😏

[andreasderjuengere]

Most of the time the theories of those speaking reflect their own pattern of thinking and/or acting.

But agreed: in general an 'election' is a fraud of 'the System' to keep a nation's group of tax slaves amused.

''We'' all are expendables in the view of those ''in power''.

[Anonymous]

because if Democrats tried to cheat this time, it'd be too obvious

Reddit echo chambers have you believing America favors Harris when the atmosphere in real life supports Trump

tell me why are leftist online complaining about the "absent" 15 million voters who voted for Joe Biden but not Kamala Harris?

[CalmUntilAbused]

No, it simply demonstrates that in 2024, the will of the citizens was so overwhelming that no reasonable amount of cheating would change the outcome. If they flipped the elections this time, a new Civil War would likely come around, and they would face an overwhelming and capable force, since it would be comprised of patriotic Americans skilled with firearms, hellbent on preserving the Second Amendment. If the National Guard in several Southern states happened to join the insurgents, the Democrats would quickly lose the power they just got through cheating. Simply put, the election fraud was simply stopped this time.

[msc545]

That is a very complicated explanation for something that clearly didn't happen. All that occurred was nobody did in the election fraud because nobody has ever done any election fraud. The only thing that changed was that the right wing was not screaming about fraud because they won. If the left had one they would be screaming their heads off.

[msc545]

Ridiculous.

[KrakenAttackin]

Well, all the states Kamala won are the states that don't require ID to vote.

Here in Georgia we seriously tightened voting security and added 1,200 poll observers who obtained a court order to be present during vote counting. The last time, poll workers taped up windows and didn't allow anyone to be present during counting and magically thousands of Biden-only votes appeared after midnight. Afraid was alive and well here in Georgia.

[Anonymous]

more than 40 million more registered voters this time, but 15 million LESS votes than last election? hehe. While this was touted as the most important and biggest election in the history of the United States with "Trump the evil dictator needing to be stopped"? I think the fraud was kicked in the ass by those that knew what to look for this time.

[Dargil]

1. Early in person voting. They could not calculate how many ballots to print

2. The swamp didn't want Kackles and called it off.

[SolitarySolace]

Lara Trump and Trump’s election integrity team was out in full force to prevent election fraud. It was expected so it was prevented.

[Alex-Snow]

I agree... there is no fraud when the GOP won. Kind of a double standard.

[Kelley1]

The Republicans were watching and the percentage was too great for the Democrats to effectively cheat.

[msc545]

How about "nobody cheated" because nobody really ever cheats as a better explanation?

[Kelley1]

Any person that watch all the cheating in 2020, knows that is a lie.

[msc545]

Where is the evidence of any cheating in 2020 or now?

[Kelley1]

How about when the Democrats stopped the counting with Trump in a big lead until they printed enough fake ballots in the middle of the and blocked up the windows and wouldn't allow the Republicans to observe the count?

[msc545]

Where is the evidence for your story?

[DryGermanGuy]

The kooks have no evidence and they never will. It's the same with Trump employing private detectives to find Barack HUSSEIN Obama's foreign birth certificate. We are still waiting.

[Anonymous]

Joey was too dementia riddled and Kamala didn't have time to set it up

[Sevenpointfive]

there is evidence of fraud. but it doesn't really matter if they conceded the election.

[Sevenpointfive]

also, those die hard democrats are close to dying. i don't think anyone will watch cable news, reads newspapers or listens to radio propoganda. of course i did see a lot of campaigning on free streaming platforms. such a shame. and now premium streaming can't even get away with NO-ADS

[msc545]

Where is the evidence?

[Sevenpointfive]

i certainly don't have it. i'm at mar-el-lago atm. check the tabloids you love to stalk. it's there

[msc545]

uh-huh. When is the evidence going to be made public?

[Sevenpointfive]

dude, it's made headlines. if you haven't seen it then you don't want to see it.

[msc545]

Really - what headlines are those?

[Sevenpointfive]

i'm sure you've heard, all of the states that didn't require photo ID harris won. that should be your biggest red flag!!!

[msc545]

sure. More people voted without having the hassle of your deliberate attempt to limit voting.

[Sevenpointfive]

i didn't make the rules. those have been the rules since i was a kid. if you don't have a license, you must have a gov't. issued ID always on your person. why would you not want this? are you for illegal immigrants voting for a president? what's your pov?

[msc545]

I don't want this because you are deliberately trying to inconvenience people to discourage them from voting, because you believe, perhaps rightly, that the more people that vote the less like Republicans are to win.

What you fail to comprehend is that happens to some extent because more people read your racist anti-worker policies, and decide to vote for Democrats.

[Sevenpointfive]

my fren! i am hispanic so that came across a little racist to me and my cousins. latinos for trump nigritooo!!! ayayeeaye~@ow ouch get off me

[PsychicBoobs]

It's only when trumper says so.

[Anonymous]

Crazy right? (That statement fits both ways)

[OddBeMe]

Oh... there is none when their guy wins. Lol