Is there actually data supporting election fraud this time?

[msc545]

Read this and tell me what you think:

https://www.planetcritical.com/p/cyber-security-experts-warn-election-hacked?utm_source=multiple-personal-recommendations-email&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

[goaded]

Seems unlikely, at least in terms of hacking. There are paper ballots for a reason. There's been an audit in NC, for example, where there were only tiny and explainable differences in counts.

"Put simply, the audits confirmed that results tabulated by machine are accurate and that there is no evidence of fraud or other irregularities that could have affected the certified general election outcomes."

https://www.ncsbe.gov/news/press-releases/2024/11/26/state-board-unanimously-certifies-2024-general-election

The main source for the article doesn't seem to be all that reliable.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/21/stephen-spoonamore-letter-harris/

The good news is that the elections are valid, the bad news is that nearly half the voters were extremely gullible.

[lightbulb27]

probably. if there's no fraud, something is wrong... haha

but is it enough fraud to change the game? Thats where I let it go last time around... gotta be enough and provable. Else, that's that.

[goaded]

Exactly, there's always going to be a few (like the Trump supporter who voted for the wife he'd murdered), but they're not enough to make a difference.

[lightbulb27]

@goaded a trump supported killed his wife and vote for her... because she was gonna vote biden? that's psycho.

[goaded]

I don't know how she was going to vote, but he used the fact that "sombody" voted for her as "proof" Democrats were cheating.

"Barry Morphew told investigators he mailed the ballot on behalf of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, to help Trump win, saying “all these other guys are cheating” and that he thought his wife would have voted for Trump anyway, according to an arrest warrant affidavit signed by a judge in Chaffee county."

www.theguardian.com/.../colorado-suspect-wife-death-accused-trump-vote

[lightbulb27]

@goaded that's crazy...

[Kelley1]

There is no end to lies by the Democrats. The fact is, unlike 2020, the Democrats could not cheat enough to win in 2024.

[Anonymous]

She lost. Let it go. No point trying to reedit and reinterpret it pretending she didn't lose and double down on the very reasons she lost.

[RedInnocent69]

Amazing how all those Democrats, with the power of the Presidency and the Senate, weren’t able to fraudulently win this time… 😂

[exitseven]

This article is eerily similar to what democrats did in 2020. Nobody ever came up with the catchy name "bullet ballots" however

[goaded]

No, a few people with no power are saying what then president Trump and his co-conspiritors said in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024. They're all wrong.

[exitseven]

@goaded That is true but it will not be true after Jan 20th

[goaded]

It was never true, but a president lying about it is different from normal people thinking they've found evidence.

[exitseven]

@goaded Why is a sworn affidavit from a citizen more believable than "an unnamed source close to the investigation"?

[goaded]

Because it's given under penalty of perjury. I don't see what that has to do with this?

[exitseven]

@goaded Nobody from the FBI or the DOJ or the fake news believed any of the thousand + people who saw instances of voter fraud but they all believed many unnamed sources for anything bad about President Trump or any of his cabinet picks. They treat it like it is the gospel truth.

[msc545]

cry me a river. Trump and his cabinet picks have very bad verified histories.

[Anonymous]

The 8 ball would say... apparently yes.

[saraupstairs]

Do you care?

[msc545]

not really. I just posted it specifically for you to piss u off.

[saraupstairs]

I think that deep down you have a good heart.

[msc545]

So I have been told. Thanks for noticing.