Would you support such a law?

[seeyounexttuesday]

When the corporate media writes their usual garbage where "experts say", the experts should be named.

[purplepoppy]

No real media outlet says such a thing. They'll either name the person or the organisation they work for. The problem today however is once names become public it then opens the doors to hate and smear campaigns.

[Yabbut]

Yes. Who are these "experts"? What makes them an expert? Let us look into them and decide for ourselves.

[Astarlessnightsky]

No, it helps recognice which news source is reliable and which ones are just bs and should be avoided.

[laraWM]

It's usually done already

[seeyounexttuesday]

absolutely not the case.

[laraWM]

You should read better media 😂

[katiesmuff]

Yes that would be a beginning!

[exitseven]

Yes, and unnamed sources must be named.

[Juxtapose]

Yes, absolutely.

[Juxtapose]

Although you have to be really careful since that is technically compelled speech.